 |
|
imacowmoo 3-:-o
|
|
Im sure it feels good for the 8 month child who has a steel rod jammed in its skull and brains sucked out.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
I don't know what it is like to kill someone
I still feel find legistlating it
JM
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
for some?
yes
JM
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zulu Elephant
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Patroklos
Enjoy being a bigot?
|
I dont think Im a bigot. I believe that serious issues deserve serious discussion. AND I am willing to respect (although in some cases passionately disagree with) everyone's views, providing they are based on REASON, LOGIC and EVIDENCE and not a personal leap of faith.
If I had said that anyone citing the divine right of kings in a serious discussion of the pros and cons of democracy deserved to be laughed at - would that make me a bigot? If so, so be it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zulu Elephant
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Patroklos
As long as your okay with that. Bigot. |
I love people who talk like that!
Like on South Park when a gnome calls Cartman a ***** and Cartman replies "Your the *****. *****"
translation: "Medical evidence"
quote: All points chosen are arbitrary based on your belief, and your belief in psuedo science is nothing more than..... wait for it.....
FAITH. |
FANTASTIC! - I love religious people who use postmodernism too! - All points of view are equally true regardless of overwhelming evidence or no evidence whatsoever.
Go on...do the thing where you use the same logic to say that creationism is equally true as evolution. I love that!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:19
|
|
quote:
We're talking economics here. You have a dwindling population, that is going to hurt you in the long run.
|
So the decision for or against abortion should be taken on the ground of economics? Well in economic terms, maintaining an immigrant until they can work and pay taxes is cheaper than a child. A weak argument, after the usual crap has fallen.
quote:
Everyone here who thinks it is up to woman to decide can not auto-ban themselves from all Iraq debates if they are not a service memeber who has been there.
|
Bull, we can debate because we have a position of wildcarded-subjectivity to this. On the abortion issue, we men are merely outsiders.
quote:
abortion is murder.
no other way to look at it. How anyone can claim it is not murder is beyond me.
|
The pro-choice argument rests on the assumption that the embryo is not a being, and is in terms of existence and essense nothing more than any other group of cells. If you hold that assumption, then it is not murder to abort that embryo.
quote:
I dont think Im a bigot. I believe that serious issues deserve serious discussion. AND I am willing to respect (although in some cases passionately disagree with) everyone's views, providing they are based on REASON, LOGIC and EVIDENCE and not a personal leap of faith.
If I had said that anyone citing the divine right of kings in a serious discussion of the pros and cons of democracy deserved to be laughed at - would that make me a bigot? If so, so be it.
|
Well said! I'm impressed! And no, I do not think you are a bigot on the issue. A bigot would merely reject religion out of hand, whereas it is perfectly legitimate to say with reason that it is irelevant to this debate.
quote:
But since this is an abortion debate you have neither either. Sure your side uses alot of Techno/Med babble (and the other to a lesser degree) but none of it has proven when the abstract of "human" life begins.
|
And you think religion can provide an answer to that? You don't need to resort to subjective, individual faith, 3000 year old pseudo-science and profitable dogma in order to answer that question, it simply requires a logical argument. I would direct you to Husserl, Heidegger and David Chalmers for examples of such existential discussions, who's impact upon medical ethics is self-explanatory. But the enquires are equally scientific, however philosophy has now replaced quantity.
quote:
All points chosen are arbitrary based on your belief, and your belief in psuedo science is nothing more than..... wait for it.....
FAITH.
|
Not at all, we experience the world through empirical means, science is merely the extension of that. Remember, you have little or no faith in something where there is reason to concur with it. Science, accordingly, requires no belief in science, indeed to do so would be inconsistent and dogmatic, which is against the principle of scientific proof. That principle is that we cannot ever be certain of anything. That the Earth goes roung the sun, that oppose poles of a magnet attract, that electrons exist to power your computer, the speed of light, that humanity evolves.... are all still "theories". There can be no such thing as a scientific "absolute" fact, so we assign science the same value we do our sight, and since there is reason to concur with our sight (and again Cartesian doubt kicks in too) there is no faith required in it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|