Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > The Triumph of Christianity
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (11): [ <<   6   7   8   9   10   11   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:19
  Old Post 27-11-2004 18:34 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#241 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
That's why I think it's shortsighted for countries with declining populations to encourage their further decline.


Less people is good. It means there's more stuff for the rest of us.

MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:19
  Old Post 27-11-2004 23:19 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#242 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Not necessarily true. For instance, the total world food production is always in excess of total minimum consumption among people, needed to sustain a healthy life.

But maldistribution of food is what causes starvation and malnutrition -- not an excess in human population.

BlackCat is offline BlackCat
Warlord

Jul 2004
time: 05:19
  Old Post 27-11-2004 23:38
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#243 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

You are rigth - if we turn each squareinch into farmland and every sea, lake and pond into a fishfarm billions and billions of people can be fed, but is that a good idea ? Isn't there a limit ?

One thing is feeding people, but what about other resources ? Unless, of course, you want the main part kept in materialistic poverty. An argument could of course be that materialism should be reduced, but with my knowledge to human beings you would have to run a dictatorship that would make stalin look like a soft whimpish child.

MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:19
  Old Post 28-11-2004 00:21 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#244 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

What I am SAYING is that it does not matter how much increase in agricultural productivity we achieve -- there will always be poverty and starvation as long as the surplus is maldistributed.

BlackCat is offline BlackCat
Warlord

Jul 2004
time: 05:19
  Old Post 28-11-2004 00:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#245 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I don't think that you are right. I can't remember a case of starvation/malnutrition witch was not initiated by war (including insane politcal systems as that stalin did in the 30´es) or some freak of nature. Of course i think of the last max 50 years.

The first are hard to handle because food often is used as a wapon where the last is easier and often are solved through international aid.

MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:19
  Old Post 28-11-2004 01:07 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#246 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

I tried Googling for general information about food distribution and starvation, but to no avail.

All I got were news pieces on specific, local humanitarian crises rather than more general information on how food distribution works, or fails to work.

Urban Ranger is offline Urban Ranger
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic

Donate to the Red Cross
The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
May 1999
time: 13:19
  Old Post 28-11-2004 11:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#247 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

We are producing enough food to feed everybody in the world. It's just that many people aren't getting any, thus it's a problem with distribution, not production.

MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:19
  Old Post 28-11-2004 13:11 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#248 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger
We are producing enough food to feed everybody in the world. It's just that many people aren't getting any, thus it's a problem with distribution, not production.



Thanks for reiterating what I already said.



But I couldn't find any sources of information from Google about food distribution.

CharlesBHoff is offline CharlesBHoff
Prince
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:19
  Old Post 29-11-2004 03:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#249 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

Have any of you ever read the Hateful stuff in Daniel Pipes far right Christian Newletter you get in your E-mail.
He even call Yusuf Islam (former Cat Steven) than terrorist which proof he is than far right wing Christian.

I sign than online petision to ask bookstore tonot carry than book attacking Islam.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:19
  Old Post 29-11-2004 16:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#250 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

We have prosperity and population coexisting. Some would say that prosperity enables population density. Others, even in this thread, have said that population density enables prosperity.

Obviously only one side is right in this argument. Guess which one?

Bosh is offline Bosh
Emperor
Taehan Mingook
Jan 1970
time: 00:19
  Old Post 29-11-2004 16:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#251 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by CharlesBHoff
Have any of you ever read the Hateful stuff in Daniel Pipes far right Christian Newletter you get in your E-mail.
He even call Yusuf Islam (former Cat Steven) than terrorist which proof he is than far right wing Christian.

I sign than online petision to ask bookstore tonot carry than book attacking Islam.

Shame that such a smart man can be such a psycho. His historical work on the Russian Civil War that I've read was very intelligently-written and meticulously research and really good stuff as long as you ignore the more ideologically-charged bits.

Ben Kenobi is offline Ben Kenobi
Emperor
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002
time: 21:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#252 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Ned:

Look at Britain. It was only after they passed laws regulating the countryside, that the population started to accumulate in the larger towns.

Once they got this accumulation, they could specialise to a much greater level, and improve productivity, like the way Adam Smith shows in the Wealth of nations. Once this productivity increases, you get the resultant increase in prosperity, drawing more people into the towns.

Whaleboy is offline Whaleboy
Prince
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003
time: 05:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:18 Visit Whaleboy's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#253 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:

Look at Britain. It was only after they passed laws regulating the countryside, that the population started to accumulate in the larger towns.


Wrong. The population began to shift to the cities by the early fourteenth century, accelerated by the increased economic power of the peasants after the first plague and revolt, then the turmoil after the wars of the roses. A steady drain from country to city occured with a reduction during the Commonwealth (Cromwell, you'd have liked him ), then increased exponentially with the industrial revolution. There is no discernable correlataion between laws regulating the countryside and population balance between countryside and city, the laws were relatively minor in any case.

Ben Kenobi is offline Ben Kenobi
Emperor
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002
time: 21:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#254 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Some shifts, but you have to consider the reboud in the 14th century from the black death.

After all, even then, you only had 70K people living in London before the black death. Not nearly enough to produce the dramatic change seen in the beginning of the industrial revolution.

Ben Kenobi is offline Ben Kenobi
Emperor
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002
time: 21:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#255 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:

then increased exponentially with the industrial revolution. There is no discernable correlataion between laws regulating the countryside and population balance between countryside and city, the laws were relatively minor in any case.


Why this exponential increase? I can't see this coming about without the policies in the Agricultural revolution regarding the enclosure act, and the desire to consolidate holdings in Britain. This forced many people off the land, and into the cities.

Whaleboy is offline Whaleboy
Prince
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003
time: 05:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:34 Visit Whaleboy's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#256 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

Population figures for the shires surrounding London, mostly Hertfordshire and as far south as the Downs went through the floor. After the black death, London's population rose to between a third and half a million in the following century. Consider Hertfordshire, a shire to the North of London.

Year Pop
1300 81,696
1377 30636
1664 65505

http://www.smr.herefordshire.gov.uk.../Population.htm

(Also there consider pop. relative to London)

The post-Tudor rise is of course attributable to the rise of urban centres in that county such as Watford and Hitchen. Was a pretty similar story for all the counties, particularly those near major cities. Hence, in the North of England, you only see a migration to the cities during the late 18th and 19th centuries, whereas the South at that time was very urbanised.

Whaleboy is offline Whaleboy
Prince
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003
time: 05:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:38 Visit Whaleboy's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#257 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:

Why this exponential increase? I can't see this coming about without the policies in the Agricultural revolution regarding the enclosure act, and the desire to consolidate holdings in Britain. This forced many people off the land, and into the cities.


Most people "on the land" as you put it, as a fraction of the population were forced off when after the peasants revolt the lords were no longer obliged to support the peasants, so replaced them all with more profitable sheep. The acts did force people off the land but the countryside was a dead duck by then already, particularly relative to the 12th century. It merely hastened the inevitable, and by the industrial revolution, economic factors (more employment in cities, less in countryside due to decline of cottage industry thanks to production).

Ben Kenobi is offline Ben Kenobi
Emperor
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002
time: 21:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:40
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#258 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:

Herefordshire is a county of 2180 square kilometres on the borders of Wales with a current population of about 170,000 people. The City of Hereford is about 65,000 people, none of the five market towns are larger than 10,000.


From your linky.

Not sure what you are trying to do here. One would anticipate a similar recovery in London proper, as we see in Hereford.

Whaleboy is offline Whaleboy
Prince
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003
time: 05:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:48 Visit Whaleboy's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#259 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Oopsie... clever Whaleboy meant Hertfordshire .. let's try again...

http://www.hertsdirect.org/libsleis...archer/medieval

http://popindex.princeton.edu/browse/v62/n4/i.html (these look fun )

Though Hereford at the time was considered a major population centre, let's have a look at London itself...

http://migration.ucc.ie/population/eupop.htm (a good reference)

http://www.visitlondon.com/city_gui...london/history/ (find details for corresponding population falls in surrounding counties)

Ben Kenobi is offline Ben Kenobi
Emperor
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002
time: 21:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#260 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:

Most people "on the land" as you put it, as a fraction of the population were forced off when after the peasants revolt the lords were no longer obliged to support the peasants, so replaced them all with more profitable sheep.


True, it was more valuable for them to keep sheep than tenents.

quote:

The acts did force people off the land but the countryside was a dead duck by then already, particularly relative to the 12th century.


Were the countrysides totally dead? Not so. While they tended to send off their population, the problem is that the cities of the time killed off more than were born there. So you need a constant immigration from the country to the city just to keep the cities up.

So long as people could have a place to stay, and to farm off the land, or to work for another person nearby, they could afford to stay. Even if they were less prosperous, it would not justify breaking the ties with family, to leave to the city.

It was only once they had to leave, that they left, and even then, many people tried to return to the countryside, if they could from the city. The only attraction to the city was the ability to work.

quote:

It merely hastened the inevitable, and by the industrial revolution, economic factors (more employment in cities, less in countryside due to decline of cottage industry thanks to production).


Also true, but you need the development in the cities, for them to supplant the cottage industry in terms of total production. And this doesn't happen until well after the enclosure act. Perhaps if we saw this before enclosure, and the subsequent migrations to the city, your point would work, but the fact that we only see this after, lends credence to my thesis that this increase in population density helped to fuel the industrial revolution in Britian.

Ben Kenobi is offline Ben Kenobi
Emperor
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002
time: 21:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 07:52
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#261 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:

Hertfordshire




I have to go soon, but when I get back, I'll continue the discussion.

Wish I got to do more of this stuff, I loved this subject in my classes.

molly bloom is offline molly bloom
Prince
Lundenwic
Oct 2001
time: 15:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 15:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#262 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Ben Kenobi

Look at Britain. It was only after they passed laws regulating the countryside, that the population started to accumulate in the larger towns.

Once they got this accumulation, they could specialise to a much greater level, and improve productivity, like the way Adam Smith shows in the Wealth of nations. Once this productivity increases, you get the resultant increase in prosperity, drawing more people into the towns.



Population was increasing up until the Black Death. It declined drastically and was recovering slowly by the time of the Tudors. There was a bizarre anomalous blip when for some unknown reason life expectancy increased in the Tudor period (although it declined afterwards).

Urbanized areas were always prey to outbreaks of disease- in Tudor times an illness known as the 'English sweats' which may have been some kind of malarial fever. Along with this were outbreaks of the new strain of syphilis which appeared in Europe after the Spanish (re)discovery of the Americas, the Great Plague in 1665, cholera, dysentery, smallpox (most famously suffered by Elizabeth I), measles and other diseases associated with large populations and cramped conditions.

The 'increased production' seen in the Industrial Revolution hardly benefited the urban poor- at one point the staple diet of the urban poor was white bread and tea, rather than the far healthier ale and brown bread which was spurned because the better sort preferred refined flour and the luxury drink of tea.
Vitamin deficiency diseases such as pellagra and rickets were common.

One element which ensured a ready supply of cheap labour from rural areas (other than enclosures of previously common land by rapacious landowners) was 'lax' morals:

' The life of the farm labourer was very different in the 19th Century to what is now. For instance, among the Dorset peasants, conception before marriage was perfectly normal, and the marriage did not take place until the pregnancy was obvious.... The reason was the low wages paid to the workers and the need to ensure extra hands in the family to earn.'

The woman whose testimony this is was born in 1883- she was the daughter of Thomas Hardy's doctor.
The rural working class were obviously discontented- and it's no surprise that the Tolpuddle Martyrs were from Hardy's county of Dorset, which achieved some notoriety for being the area of England where labourers of both sexes were exploited to the most shameful degree.

A similar 'laxity' with regard to morals could be observed in the overcrowded unsanitary hovels of the city's poor:

''Modesty must be an unknown virtue, decency an unimaginable thing, where in one small chamber, with the beds lying as thickly as they can be packed, father, mother, young men, lads, grown and growing up girls- two and sometimes three generations- are herded promiscuously; where every operation of the toilette and of nature, dressings, undressings, births, deaths,- is performed by each within the sight and hearing of all- where the whole atmosphere is sensual and where human nature is degraded below the level of the swine... Cases of incest are anythibng but uncommon.

We complain of the ante-nuptial unchastity of our women....here in cottage herding, is the sufficient account and history of it all....'

Reverend James Fraser, 1867

and:

'At the infirmary many girls of 14 years of age, and even girls of 13, up to 17 years of age, have been brought in pregnany to be confined here. The girls have acknowledged that their 'ruin' has taken place... in going or returning from their (agricultural) work.

I have myself witnessed gross indecencies between boys and girls of 14 to 16 years of age....'

Children's Employment Commission Report, 1867


Various factors enabled the population both urban and rural to grow- one humble but staggeringly obvious factor, was the potato, which enabled the non-industrialized Irish population to explode. So much for specialization and improved productivity.... in 1894, in the greatest city in the world, in the greatest empire the world had ever seen, in Bethnal Green 83 per cent of children had no solid food other than bread at seventeen out of twenty one meals in any week.

The Industrial Revolution meant that for the first time since the dispossession of Roman peasantry by the explosive growth of the latifundia, mass urban poverty could be observed by anyone with a mind to view it.
A worker in Great Britain might earn in the 'booming' 1830s and 1840s a wage between 25 pence and 2 pounds a week. In 1840-41, 25 pence purchased six four lb loaves, not of a very good quality. This would have been enough to just feed two adults and three children, at a time when childcare, nurseries and contraception were outside the reach of the majority of the urban workforce.

This 25 pence spent on bread meant nothing left over for rent, tea, sugar, meat, vegetables and certainly not fruit.

There were however improvements in crops through crossbreeding and agricultural experimentation, crop rotation, better ploughs, the replacement of oxen by horses, an increase in glass production which facilitated market gardening (unseen in Europe since Roman times, Venice led the way in the return of this technique), the colonization and subsequent opening up of arable land in parts of Eastern Europe by Brandenburg-Prussia, the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Russia, and with the advent of the steam railway and steamships, the shipment of grain from Canada, the United States and Australia.

Scientific agriculture not specialization and improved industrial production fed the growing populations of the industrializing world.

Advances in food science meant that canned food became a viable prospect, adulteration of food was banned and prosecuted, and in the early 20th Century, the role of vitamins came to be understood.

Rickets disappeared in urban areas of Great Britain, only to make its reappearance when Margaret Thatcher was prime minister- presumably not what she meant by a return to 'Victorian values', but then irony was never her strong point.

The triumph of medicine over disease and the understanding of disease also meant fewer city dwellers died from the diseases of the city- cholera, typhoid, tuberculosis, dysentery, scurvy, and so on.

Heresson is offline Heresson
King
of frogs
Jun 2000
time: 06:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 22:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#263 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

I've lost control over this thread

OzzyKP is offline OzzyKP
King
Rockville, MD
Oct 1999
time: 00:19
  Old Post 30-11-2004 23:22 Visit OzzyKP's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#264 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

That tends to happen.

CharlesBHoff is offline CharlesBHoff
Prince
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:19
  Old Post 03-12-2004 00:58
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#265 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
Originally posted by molly bloom



Population was increasing up until the Black Death. It declined drastically and was recovering slowly by the time of the Tudors. There was a bizarre anomalous blip when for some unknown reason life expectancy increased in the Tudor period (although it declined afterwards).

Urbanized areas were always prey to outbreaks of disease- in Tudor times an illness known as the 'English sweats' which may have been some kind of malarial fever. Along with this were outbreaks of the new strain of syphilis which appeared in Europe after the Spanish (re)discovery of the Americas, the Great Plague in 1665, cholera, dysentery, smallpox (most famously suffered by Elizabeth I), measles and other diseases associated with large populations and cramped conditions.

The 'increased production' seen in the Industrial Revolution hardly benefited the urban poor- at one point the staple diet of the urban poor was white bread and tea, rather than the far healthier ale and brown bread which was spurned because the better sort preferred refined flour and the luxury drink of tea.
Vitamin deficiency diseases such as pellagra and rickets were common.

One element which ensured a ready supply of cheap labour from rural areas (other than enclosures of previously common land by rapacious landowners) was 'lax' morals:

' The life of the farm labourer was very different in the 19th Century to what is now. For instance, among the Dorset peasants, conception before marriage was perfectly normal, and the marriage did not take place until the pregnancy was obvious.... The reason was the low wages paid to the workers and the need to ensure extra hands in the family to earn.'

The woman whose testimony this is was born in 1883- she was the daughter of Thomas Hardy's doctor.
The rural working class were obviously discontented- and it's no surprise that the Tolpuddle Martyrs were from Hardy's county of Dorset, which achieved some notoriety for being the area of England where labourers of both sexes were exploited to the most shameful degree.

A similar 'laxity' with regard to morals could be observed in the overcrowded unsanitary hovels of the city's poor:

''Modesty must be an unknown virtue, decency an unimaginable thing, where in one small chamber, with the beds lying as thickly as they can be packed, father, mother, young men, lads, grown and growing up girls- two and sometimes three generations- are herded promiscuously; where every operation of the toilette and of nature, dressings, undressings, births, deaths,- is performed by each within the sight and hearing of all- where the whole atmosphere is sensual and where human nature is degraded below the level of the swine... Cases of incest are anythibng but uncommon.

We complain of the ante-nuptial unchastity of our women....here in cottage herding, is the sufficient account and history of it all....'

Reverend James Fraser, 1867

and:

'At the infirmary many girls of 14 years of age, and even girls of 13, up to 17 years of age, have been brought in pregnany to be confined here. The girls have acknowledged that their 'ruin' has taken place... in going or returning from their (agricultural) work.

I have myself witnessed gross indecencies between boys and girls of 14 to 16 years of age....'

Children's Employment Commission Report, 1867


Various factors enabled the population both urban and rural to grow- one humble but staggeringly obvious factor, was the potato, which enabled the non-industrialized Irish population to explode. So much for specialization and improved productivity.... in 1894, in the greatest city in the world, in the greatest empire the world had ever seen, in Bethnal Green 83 per cent of children had no solid food other than bread at seventeen out of twenty one meals in any week.

The Industrial Revolution meant that for the first time since the dispossession of Roman peasantry by the explosive growth of the latifundia, mass urban poverty could be observed by anyone with a mind to view it.
A worker in Great Britain might earn in the 'booming' 1830s and 1840s a wage between 25 pence and 2 pounds a week. In 1840-41, 25 pence purchased six four lb loaves, not of a very good quality. This would have been enough to just feed two adults and three children, at a time when childcare, nurseries and contraception were outside the reach of the majority of the urban workforce.

This 25 pence spent on bread meant nothing left over for rent, tea, sugar, meat, vegetables and certainly not fruit.

There were however improvements in crops through crossbreeding and agricultural experimentation, crop rotation, better ploughs, the replacement of oxen by horses, an increase in glass production which facilitated market gardening (unseen in Europe since Roman times, Venice led the way in the return of this technique), the colonization and subsequent opening up of arable land in parts of Eastern Europe by Brandenburg-Prussia, the Austro-Hungarian Empire and Russia, and with the advent of the steam railway and steamships, the shipment of grain from Canada, the United States and Australia.

Scientific agriculture not specialization and improved industrial production fed the growing populations of the industrializing world.

Advances in food science meant that canned food became a viable prospect, adulteration of food was banned and prosecuted, and in the early 20th Century, the role of vitamins came to be understood.

Rickets disappeared in urban areas of Great Britain, only to make its reappearance when Margaret Thatcher was prime minister- presumably not what she meant by a return to 'Victorian values', but then irony was never her strong point.

The triumph of medicine over disease and the understanding of disease also meant fewer city dwellers died from the diseases of the city- cholera, typhoid, tuberculosis, dysentery, scurvy, and so on.


Syphilis didnot come from the new world from the Indian.
The History channel ran than show that show than richman bury in England have advange stage of syphilis the body date from late 13th century to early 14th century. Then they undercover than ancient Greek city dataing back to around 1200 BCE in which 1/3 of the people bury bones show sign of then haveing syphilis. Syphilis damage bones in a certain way in the advange stage.

molly bloom is offline molly bloom
Prince
Lundenwic
Oct 2001
time: 15:19
  Old Post 03-12-2004 15:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#266 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by CharlesBHoff


Syphilis didnot come from the new world from the Indian.
The History channel ran than show that show than richman bury in England have advange stage of syphilis the body date from late 13th century to early 14th century. Then they undercover than ancient Greek city dataing back to around 1200 BCE in which 1/3 of the people bury bones show sign of then haveing syphilis. Syphilis damage bones in a certain way in the advange stage.


It'd be nice if you bothered to read my post correctly. I said it was a new strain of syphilis, not that it was wholly introduced from the Americas.

'New' strain implies the existence of an old strain, geddit?

In any case, I knew a forensic archaeologist at Manchester University in the 1980s who had studied bones from Mediterranean classical inhumations and had observed the characteristic pitting signs of syphilis in them. I was also aware of the research which had revealed signs of syphilis in human remains in the northern English port city of Hull.

" Syphilitic osteomyelitis

Caused by Treponema pallidum and T. pertenue (yaws)

Bone involvement more common in congenital syphilis; appears at 5th month of gestation in areas of active enchondral ossification (osteochondritis) and periosteum

Acquired syphilis involves bone in tertiary phase, usually nose, palate, skull, tibia, vertebrae, hands/feet

Xray: reactive periosteal bone deposition (“saber shin” of tibia)

Gross: bone destruction and production; necrotic, well-defined bone defects of cortex and periosteum surrounded by sclerotic bone

Micro: edematous granulation tissue, plasma cells, granulomas, necrotic bone and new bone production

Positive stains: silver stains "

http://www.pathologyoutlines.com/bonepf.html


Good try Charley Farley, but no cigar.

CharlesBHoff is offline CharlesBHoff
Prince
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:19
  Old Post 04-12-2004 23:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#267 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

quote:
Originally posted by molly bloom


It'd be nice if you bothered to read my post correctly. I said it was a new strain of syphilis, not that it was wholly introduced from the Americas.

'New' strain implies the existence of an old strain, geddit?

In any case, I knew a forensic archaeologist at Manchester University in the 1980s who had studied bones from Mediterranean classical inhumations and had observed the characteristic pitting signs of syphilis in them. I was also aware of the research which had revealed signs of syphilis in human remains in the northern English port city of Hull.

" Syphilitic osteomyelitis

Caused by Treponema pallidum and T. pertenue (yaws)

Bone involvement more common in congenital syphilis; appears at 5th month of gestation in areas of active enchondral ossification (osteochondritis) and periosteum

Acquired syphilis involves bone in tertiary phase, usually nose, palate, skull, tibia, vertebrae, hands/feet

Xray: reactive periosteal bone deposition (“saber shin” of tibia)

Gross: bone destruction and production; necrotic, well-defined bone defects of cortex and periosteum surrounded by sclerotic bone

Micro: edematous granulation tissue, plasma cells, granulomas, necrotic bone and new bone production

Positive stains: silver stains "

http://www.pathologyoutlines.com/bonepf.html


Good try Charley Farley, but no cigar.


Molly the The anti-islamist. There was no new strain it was than lies spead by than incompiant doctor who dislike the local native in the new world and to hide the spainish use of germ warfare in the new world on the native by speading smallpox by giving smallpox inflect blanket to the native on purpose something which your blias mind would approve of.

Lazarus and the Gimp is offline Lazarus and the Gimp
King
Whale-raping abomination
Aug 2000
time: 05:19
  Old Post 04-12-2004 23:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#268 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

I don't think there was much subterfuge associated with the Spanish use of smallpox. They were quite open about cleansing the world of the heathens. After all, the Indians didn't get CNN or decent newspapers to warn them.

BeBro is offline BeBro
King
of the Krauts
Mar 2000
time: 06:19
  Old Post 04-12-2004 23:27 Visit BeBro's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#269 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

CBH: Well argued. You actually make me wish to convert over to Islam.

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:19
  Old Post 04-12-2004 23:30 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#270 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote:
Originally posted by CharlesBHoff


Molly the The anti-islamist. There was no new strain it was than lies spead by than incompiant doctor who dislike the local native in the new world and to hide the spainish use of germ warfare in the new world on the native by speading smallpox by giving smallpox inflect blanket to the native on purpose something which your blias mind would approve of.


Anti-Islam!

It was the Brits, not the Spanish or Americans, who spread smallpox delilberately through the distribution of infected blankets, and that was only once.

As for syph, it reappeared with a vengence in 1495 in Naples. Given the havok it wrecked among the French army, I find it difficult to believe it had only been in Europe for two years. I find it more likely to have been a mutation of pre-existing sysph.

 
Pages (11): [ <<   6   7   8   9   10   11   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19.
Apolyton Time is 00:19.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0828 seconds (92.34% PHP - 7.66% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net