Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Republicans: We Will NOT Tolerate blocking Bush's Nominees, The End of Fillibusters?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (7): [ 1   2   3   4     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Republicans: We Will NOT Tolerate blocking Bush's Nominees, The End of Fillibusters? Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
SENATE LEADERSHIP
Frist To Go 'Nuclear' On Nominations
By John Stanton
Senate Majority Leader Frist today is expected to give his blessing to a GOP plan to dramatically change the Senate's voting rules -- effectively eliminating Democrats' ability to filibuster President Bush's judicial nominees, aides said Tuesday.
Democratic leadership sources warned that a move to reduce from 60 to 51 the number of votes needed to end a filibuster of judicial nominees would be considered a declaration of war by most Democrats, could further weaken the position of the chamber's shrinking population of moderates and almost certainly would create new obstacles for the GOP's agenda.
During a closed-door meeting of the GOP Conference today, Frist will inform his colleagues that while the so-called "nuclear option" of changing Senate rules will be reserved as a last resort, Republicans will no longer tolerate Democratic efforts to block Bush's nominees to the federal bench, an aide to Frist confirmed.
According to this source, no immediate action on changing the rules is planned. Frist will wait for the next floor debate on a contested Bush appointee.
During that process, he will attempt to negotiate with Democrats and pursue any and all options to break the deadlock. Assuming those overtures fail, Frist would then ask the presiding officer of the Senate to rule on the 60-vote requirement.
The presiding officer would then find that only a 51-vote majority is needed to end a filibuster in the case of judicial nominees -- a finding to which Democrats would almost certainly object, forcing a vote on whether to overturn the ruling of the chair.
But because Frist would only need 51 votes from his new 55 vote-majority to protect the decision, the majority leader believes he would have enough support within his Conference to impose the change.
Although Frist came to his decision in an effort to speed the approval process of Bush's nominees, Democratic sources warned pursuing a rule change would almost certainly poison the already bitter atmosphere in the Senate and undermine the efforts of moderates in both parties to reduce tensions in the chamber.
A bipartisan group of moderate lawmakers Tuesday held the first post-election meeting of the "Centrist Coalition" headed up by Sens. Joseph Lieberman, D-Conn., and Olympia Snowe, R-Maine. The group announced that Sens. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, and Ben Nelson, D-Neb., will serve as co-chairmen.
The group's aim, according to Snowe, is to "help break the impasse on issues" moderates in both parties can agree are important to the nation as a whole. Lieberman told reporters, "What drives us together is the feeling that Congress has become too partisan."
But use of the nuclear option on judges could kill those efforts before they ever begin. One source close to Democratic moderates warned, "If Frist starts playing games like this, you're going to see more and more of us say, 'Well, [forget] him.'"
A Democratic leadership source agreed, predicting a change to the rules might galvanize Senate Democrats of all stripes while emboldening progressive elements within the party to become more aggressive in their opposition to the GOP.
"Can you imagine what a guy like [Sen. Tom] Harkin will do?" the leadership source asked of the populist Democrat from Iowa.


The far-right Republicans continue to show their hatred of democracy and their love of one-party rule.

Odin is offline Odin
Prince
Biology Nerd at Minnesota State University Moorhead
Sep 2000
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

GePap is offline GePap
King
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

Well, can't the democrats fillibuser that proposal?

Odin is offline Odin
Prince
Biology Nerd at Minnesota State University Moorhead
Sep 2000
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:07
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote:
Originally posted by GePap
Well, can't the democrats fillibuser that proposal?


I hope so.

Albert Speer is offline Albert Speer
Emperor
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:09
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

What will Mr. Smith do now?

DRoseDARs is offline DRoseDARs

Prince
"My god, it's full of peas..."
Jul 2002
time: 21:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:10
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Republicans: We Will NOT Tolerate blocking Bush's Nominees, The End of Fillibusters? Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by monkspider


The far-right Republicans continue to show their hatred of democracy and their love of one-party rule.


Not to mention their love of their own hipocrasy. Who here remembers the Republicans filibustering Clinton many, many times?

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

So let me get this straight. Bush sends up 211 nominations and the Senate signs off on 201 of them but decides they don't like 10 out of 211 and Republicans are claiming that is a mass blocking? They need to stop listening to Rush Limbaugh and start doing some indendent thinking.

BTW it would also help for them to reread the Constitution especially the part about how the President's judicial nominees are to be "selected with the advice and consent of the Senate".

monkspider is offline monkspider
King
banned
Aug 2001
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by Albert Speer
What will Mr. Smith do now?


Word.

Repugs

alva is offline alva
Emperor
Republic of Flanders
Sep 2001
time: 06:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:12
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by Albert Speer
What will Mr. Smith do now?

Go to Canada...

Whoha is offline Whoha
King
The TOC is supposed to be classified guys...
Dec 2001
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:13
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

So wait, when the democrats throw every rule and technicality they can at preventing a vote, thats Democracy in action, but when the republicans force the senate to vote on nominees, thats totalitarian communism in action?

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:14
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Whoha: That appears to be the Republican position.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
The far-right Republicans continue to show their hatred of democracy and their love of one-party rule.


How is being the majority party and trying to pass laws hatred of democracy?

Odin is offline Odin
Prince
Biology Nerd at Minnesota State University Moorhead
Sep 2000
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Whoha
So wait, when the democrats throw every rule and technicality they can at preventing a vote, thats Democracy in action, but when the republicans force the senate to vote on nominees, thats totalitarian communism in action?


Fillibustering keeps the majority from steamrolling the minority and so forces comprimise.

Whoha is offline Whoha
King
The TOC is supposed to be classified guys...
Dec 2001
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

It does indeed, however, I don't give a rats ass about Gay Marriage and abortion, so the apointment of Bush's Nominees matters very little to me. Unless of course we can get some neat footage of people immolating themselves over it.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by Odin
Fillibustering keeps the majority from steamrolling the minority and so forces comprimise.




Filibustering is an abuse of parliamentary procedure to give the minority effective veto power over all legislation.

Odin is offline Odin
Prince
Biology Nerd at Minnesota State University Moorhead
Sep 2000
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by Kuciwalker




Filibustering is an abuse of parliamentary procedure to give the minority effective veto power over all legislation.


It prevents Tyranny by Majority

Whoha is offline Whoha
King
The TOC is supposed to be classified guys...
Dec 2001
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#17 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Odin


Fillibustering keeps the majority from steamrolling the minority and so forces comprimise.


However, we moved senator elections from the state legislature to direct, so we aren't in as credible a position to say that we don't have the Tyranny of the majority right now. Did the Democrats gain some state legislatures?

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#18 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Alpha Centauri

It is attempting to change 225 year old laws which guard fairness and balance in judicial nominees. The 2/3 rule is so that any nominee must be supported by the vast majority of senators but the Republicans want to change that so they can ram through any body they want no matter how extreme.

The Constitution says the senate is to advice the President on nominees and that all of the nominees must be approved by the senate. The 2/3 rule is a centuries old law which is designed to create more cooporation between parties and to assist in creating a group consensus.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#19 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Odin
It prevents Tyranny by Majority




That's what the constitution is for. It's absolutely worthless to have Congress otherwise; we might as well have each party nominate a representative and when they agree on something, it happens. It's retarded to give anyone an effective veto.

Albert Speer is offline Albert Speer
Emperor
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#20 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

and that is a very legitimate position... the majority should be able to legislate their ideology.

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#21 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
It is attempting to change 225 year old laws which guard fairness and balance in judicial nominees. The 2/3 rule is so that any nominee must be supported by the vast majority of senators but the Republicans want to change that so they can ram through any body they want no matter how extreme.

The Constitution says the senate is to advice the President on nominees and that all of the nominees must be approved by the senate. The 2/3 rule is a centuries old law which is designed to create more cooporation between parties and to assist in creating a group consensus.


It is, however, a law, and it is the Senate prerogative to set its own rules. It even says so in the Constitution.

The Republicans are not acting out of bounds at all. In fact, the Constitutionality of the 2/3 rule itself could be challenged.

Odin is offline Odin
Prince
Biology Nerd at Minnesota State University Moorhead
Sep 2000
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#22 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

quote:
Originally posted by Kuciwalker


It is, however, a law, and it is the Senate prerogative to set its own rules. It even says so in the Constitution.

The Republicans are not acting out of bounds at all. In fact, the Constitutionality of the 2/3 rule itself could be challenged.


The problem is that they are changing it out of petty politics, not for a legitimate reason.

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#23 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by Kuciwalker
That's what the constitution is for. It's absolutely worthless to have Congress otherwise; we might as well have each party nominate a representative and when they agree on something, it happens. It's retarded to give anyone an effective veto.


It's not a veto in any way in any shape or in any form. You have to have 40% of the Senate all agree that something isn't good before you can have a filibuster. Do you know how hard it would be to maintain 40% of the senate on an issue? Do you realize how rare filibusters are because of this?

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#24 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Odin
The problem is that they are changing it out of petty politics, not for a legitimate reason.


Does it matter, if there are legitimate reasons? (No)

Albert Speer is offline Albert Speer
Emperor
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:30
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#25 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

when was the last time the GOP was pushing so many amendments (gay marriage, abortion, natural citizen presidents, etc.)? 1865?

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#26 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
It's not a veto in any way in any shape or in any form. You have to have 40% of the Senate all agree that something isn't good before you can have a filibuster. Do you know how hard it would be to maintain 40% of the senate on an issue? Do you realize how rare filibusters are because of this?


If it's difficult to get 40%, it's much more difficult to get 60%.

KrazyHorse is offline KrazyHorse
King
Macedonia
May 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:31 Visit KrazyHorse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#27 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

nm

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#28 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

I'm not defending Republicans. I think the rule never should've been there.

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:32 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#29 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by GePap
Well, can't the democrats fillibuser that proposal?


No. It only takes a simple majority to change house rules and the President of the Senate (Dick Cheney) can change the rules at a whim. The reason they don't want to do this is that it will allow the Democrats to do it once they return to a majority within the Senate, and payback could be a *****.

Odin is offline Odin
Prince
Biology Nerd at Minnesota State University Moorhead
Sep 2000
time: 23:18
  Old Post 18-11-2004 04:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#30 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by chegitz guevara

payback could be a *****.


 
Pages (7): [ 1   2   3   4     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18.
Apolyton Time is 00:18.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0671 seconds (91.10% PHP - 8.90% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net