 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:18
|
|
My sex ed classes in public school covered the bases of contraception and disease prevention, but always made clear that no method except abstinence was 100% effective. And this was almost 20 years ago. I fail to see the benefit of abstinence only eduction over this.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
No, you are wrong there.
Condoms only have a 95% chance of stopping STDs when used properly.
Of course, that is a lot higher than is being claimed.
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arrian
Surely you're not under the mistaken impression that I'm supporting abstinence-only "sex ed" are you? I thought you could read.
-Arrian |
Arrian, do you need smilies inserted somewhere sensitive?
I thought you had a senzayuma fercrissakes.
The point is, someone like Obi Gyn gets a fit of the vapours, because, oh criminy, lawks-a-mucky, some people might get taught that condoms can protect you from H.I.V. and other sexually transmitted diseases.
But hey, he's disovered that condoms aren't 110% effective- who knew? So this means there's a slight risk involved- condoms come off, people don't use them correctly, et cetera.
Well, that's called life. There are no cast iron guarantees, but there are steps people can take to reduce their risk of exposure. And a condom is one of those steps.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
That's a rather glib way of putting it. If condoms are only 98% or 99% effective each go when used properly, then over time you have a cumulative chance of failure that is much higher. Better than nothing, of course. But it is much more than a "slight risk." |
Sarcastic not glib. Unlike Obi Gyn and the Vatican I can quote unbiblical chapter and verse on safer sex and condom usage.
" The church's claims are revealed in a BBC1 Panorama programme, Sex and the Holy City, to be broadcast on Sunday. The president of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for the Family, Cardinal Alfonso Lopez Trujillo, told the programme: "The Aids virus is roughly 450 times smaller than the spermatozoon. The spermatozoon can easily pass through the 'net' that is formed by the condom.
"These margins of uncertainty... should represent an obligation on the part of the health ministries and all these campaigns to act in the same way as they do with regard to cigarettes, which they state to be a danger."
The WHO has condemned the Vatican's views, saying: "These incorrect statements about condoms and HIV are dangerous when we are facing a global pandemic which has already killed more than 20 million people, and currently affects at least 42 million."
The organisation says "consistent and correct" condom use reduces the risk of HIV infection by 90%. There may be breakage or slippage of condoms - but not, the WHO says, holes through which the virus can pass .
Scientific research by a group including the US National Institutes of Health and the WHO found "intact condoms... are essentially impermeable to particles the size of STD pathogens including the smallest sexually transmitted virus... condoms provide a highly effective barrier to transmission of particles of similar size to those of the smallest STD viruses".
The Vatican's Cardinal Trujillo said: "They are wrong about that... this is an easily recognisable fact."
The programme includes a Catholic nun advising her HIV-infected choir master not to use condoms with his wife because "the virus can pass through".
http://www.guardian.co.uk/aids/stor...59068%2C00.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/3176982.stm
Last edited by molly bloom on 02-12-2004 at 20:58
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|