 |
|
cubbyphan1138
|
|
Score 670 reporting Cubs may actually have a good shot at making a deal for Kolb. If you are a Cubs fan this is a great board to hang out at for the latest info:
http://mb3.scout.com/fchicagocubsfrm1
While its not a major signing, I was also happy the Cubs picked up Blanco. One of the best defensive catchers in baseball and he has a good rapport with Maddux. Big improvement over Bako.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lawrence of Arabia
|
 |
of the Gulag Archipelago
Apr 2001 time: 06:17
|
|
sox need to sign pedro, cabrera for sure, varitek and pavano would be second tier for me, and trade one of the first basemen for a utility outfielder, and sign a 5th starter/long relief. so we'd have
curt
pedro
pavano
arroyo
wakefield/long reliever
at SS we'd have cabrera (this guy is something special)
1B i'd take mientkievcidawcz over millar because millar tends to get bad cases of foot in mouth disease.
2B is bellhorn
3B is mueller/youkilis
i dont care how good hanley ramirez is, he didnt make the top 50 minor league players last year, we need to keep cabrera at SS. give him a 4 year deal. he will average over .300 over those years with about 50 doubles. + speed, + defense, not bad 2 hole hitter.
yankees should trade everything they have + money for big unit. that would be the third time in the last 4 years that the Dbacks are personally screwed over the yanks (first time in 01 when they beat the yanks, then in 04 when they gave away schilling to the sox for an empty bag of peanuts, and then in 05 when they gave away a 40+ year old pitcher who will be good for at most 2 years)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Oh, DanS, is there still that BS movement to try to deny the Nationals a baseball only stadium? |
Mostly, the movement is for having the new team help finance the new baseball-only stadium. Of course, this would kill the deal to get baseball to the city of Washington for another 3 or 4 decades. I got an automated voice-mail message today urging me to call the head of the DC City Council to urge her to vote against the stadium. The question is then begged of who is funding the anti-stadium drive...
In any event, while I am sympathetic to that approach as a taxpayer ($500 million for 600,000 residents is almost $1,000 apiece), and friends in the construction business tell me that the price may go way up, that wasn't the deal the mayor signed with baseball. We have to decide whether we want baseball or not. The mayor has some strong arguments for why baseball is good for DC, the chief of which is that he is doing his best to extend stays of tourists by a day or two. If they stay in town another day, they get a hotel room, go to restaurants, etc. This would be all good for DC business and the city treasury. The multiplier is much higher for DC than for other cities. And he sees the buy-in is baseball.
Some people say that they should just play in RFK, but that deal's not on the table. We are building a soccer-only stadium as well (I think this makes sense) financed on the public dime, so that sort of takes the wind out of the sails of the opponents to public financing.
Last edited by DanS on 10-12-2004 at 05:47
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|