 |
|
Chemical Ollie
|
 |
Bored of this board
Jan 2002 time: 06:13
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Giancarlo
Stop being so critical. |
I'm mostly critical to those who lean back in their armchairs and say "enough is being done". That is simply arrogant. While we can all agree that every effort is highly appreciated, there is not enough capacity to do enough.
Why do you expect me to ignore things like this?
quote: biblical proportions my ass. |
You are right, as the world population was much smaller back then, the biblical disasters were not even close to this in absolute numbers.
I think this needs no further comment
quote: US Navy saved the day |
Locally
Last edited by Chemical Ollie on 31-12-2004 at 01:33
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
I agree that certain parts of UN either are fck'ed up in politics, others seems deeply involved in regular swindle, but i think that the catastrophe aid sections usually works (maybe not fast, but they are reliable).
But i must admit I felt rather sick reading this :
quote:
“Only really the UN can do that job,” she told BBC Radio Four’s PM programme.
“It is the only body that has the moral authority. But it can only do it well if it is backed up by the authority of the great powers.”
|
Since when has UN achieved moral superiority ? I know that it isn't what she says, but is it possible to interpret it in other ways ?
quote:
She said the US was “very bad at coordinating with anyone” and India had its own problems to deal with.
|
I read this as "not good coordinating with UN", and that is sometimes good. Currently Iraq.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sprayber
Is there not going to be any coordianation at all? I saw on CNN where Thailand was actually concerned that aid was coming too swiftly for it to handle. Someone mentioned at good idea that some of the things they really need are helicopters and engineers to get in there and start fixing runways for planes to land on. Anyone sending in combat engineers and such to get emergency infrastructure in the areas where everything has been washed away. All the money in the world isnt going to do much good while no one can actually put supplies on the ground. |
I think that they are trying to coordinate as hard as they can, but the task is immense. More than four countries are involved (four major and a couple minor), thousands and thousands of square kilometres are involved and infrastructure is in several areas nonexistent.
Helicopters are good in such a situation, but they have one big flaw. If i'm not wrong, they need 4-5 (man)hours maintenace for each hour they are in the air, so you can't just say "lets send a couple of hundreds helicopters", they need massive backup.
The same goes for "combat engineers", they need supplies, equipment etc, so you can't just send thousands of those to the area in short notice. Secondly, soldiers can give political headeggs (sounds as simple ) - just take the Israeli group that was supposed to go to Sri lanka, theyt weren't allowed because they was military (if i'm not wrong, the real reason was that some muslim groups didn't like israelis in Sri lanka  )
Another thing is the timeframe. It's six days since it happend, it took a couple of days for everybody to realize the size of the catastrophe, and the place is quite far away in terms of travel.
You are right about the money. At the moment money isn't the issue, although some people thinks that if you just spend a lot of money, then all problems are solved.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|