Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Who's the worst U.S. president ever?
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (8): [ 1   2   3   4   5     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
St Leo is offline St Leo
King of Scenario League
Member of the Apolyton Social Democratic Party
Jul 2005
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 10:37 Visit St Leo<br><img src=/forums/images/staff-icon.gif>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#31 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Agathon
How can anyone say that FDR is the worst? He's the best president the US ever had, as Churchill is the best Prime Minister the UK ever had.


Personally, I dislike Churchill.

Is he really better than Gladstone, Pitt the Younger, Pitt the Elder, or Disraeli?

PLATO is offline PLATO

King
Of the occupied South
Dec 2002
time: 23:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 10:45
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#32 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

Lincoln
Grant
Hayes

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 11:56
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#33 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

U.S. Grant.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 12:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#34 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote:
you must admit that he still has four years to vindicate himself somehow, although I personally don't see a way. He's about sixty years too late to defeat Hitler...




I'll nominate Wilson, whose stubborness ruined his dream of the League of Nations and was an utterly racist idiot. Harding, for running a den of corruption and didn't care a whit.

quote:
Rutherford B. Hayes who, like he-who-shall-not-be-named-in-this-thread, stole his election to the presidency, and paid back his South Carolinian supporters by ending Reconstruction, a move that cost black Americans their life, liberty, and property well into the 20th century.


Frankly, I wouldn't not put him on a list. His inclusion is a result of NOT seeing the alternative! Tilden's VP choice was a KLAN member. You think ending Reconstruction was bad? I'm sure Tilden would have tried to repeal the 13th Amendment.

Rufus T. Firefly is offline Rufus T. Firefly
Prince
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000
time: 07:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 12:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#35 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui Frankly, I wouldn't not put him on a list. His inclusion is a result of NOT seeing the alternative! Tilden's VP choice was a KLAN member. You think ending Reconstruction was bad? I'm sure Tilden would have tried to repeal the 13th Amendment.


That has nothing to do with what a completely crap prez Hayes was; his "accomplishments" still stand. Moreover, if you can point to a single instance of any 19th-century vice president doing anything with his position, good or bad, I'll be mightily impressed; until then, it's hard to see what anybody's choice for veep has to do with anything.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 12:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#36 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Moreover, if you can point to a single instance of any 19th-century vice president doing anything with his position, good or bad, I'll be mightily impressed; until then, it's hard to see what anybody's choice for veep has to do with anything.


Indicates Tilden's real beliefs on the issue. You don't nominate a Veep that you find abhorrant.

quote:
That has nothing to do with what a completely crap prez Hayes was; his "accomplishments" still stand.


Of course it does. The alternatives were much worse. Gotta look at it in context. Otherwise, Lincoln's near-dictatorial policies during the Civil War 'stand' and he's considered one of the worst Presidents instead of one of the best.

Rufus T. Firefly is offline Rufus T. Firefly
Prince
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000
time: 07:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 13:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#37 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
quote:
Moreover, if you can point to a single instance of any 19th-century vice president doing anything with his position, good or bad, I'll be mightily impressed; until then, it's hard to see what anybody's choice for veep has to do with anything.


Indicates Tilden's real beliefs on the issue. You don't nominate a Veep that you find abhorrant.


Read up on 19th century presidential politics. Candidates didn't pick their own veeps. The party picked them to balance the ticket. Sounds like they picked a crap veep, but its got nothing to do with how Tilden would have governed, and nothing to do with how Hayes did govern.

quote:
quote:
That has nothing to do with what a completely crap prez Hayes was; his "accomplishments" still stand.


Of course it does. The alternatives were much worse. Gotta look at it in context. Otherwise, Lincoln's near-dictatorial policies during the Civil War 'stand' and he's considered one of the worst Presidents instead of one of the best.


Oh, come on. Do you evaluate Nixon based on your opinions of Ed Muskie and Sargant Shriver? Do you evaluate Bush based on your opinions of Edwards and Lieberman? That's a very...strange...way of looking at it.

Jack_www is offline Jack_www
King

Donate to the Red Cross
Southern California
Jul 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 13:21
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#38 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

I would have to say Jimmy Carter.

Ted Striker is offline Ted Striker
Emperor
United States of America
Jan 1970
time: 21:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 13:30 Visit Ted Striker's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#39 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

I don't think any of the pre Civil War Presidents can be blamed for contributing to the Civil War.

It was an inevitable event that was going to happen since the birth of our nation as an independent nation.

But I think alot of the post Civil war Presidents did a horrible, horrible job.

Oh yeah, my vote is for George W. Bush.

DanS is offline DanS
Emperor
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 13:30 Visit DanS's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#40 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Luckily, the institution of US President is so weak that it is damn near impossible for him to ruin the country in 4 or 8 years (minus the "football" briefcase, of course).

It's tough to pick a worst president. I think Nixon was pretty bad in hindsight, but he wasn't uniformly bad. Carter wasn't uniformly bad either, but he was close. Hoover was in office at the wrong time -- I think he would have done splendidly at any other time.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 13:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#41 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
Read up on 19th century presidential politics. Candidates didn't pick their own veeps. The party picked them to balance the ticket. Sounds like they picked a crap veep, but its got nothing to do with how Tilden would have governed, and nothing to do with how Hayes did govern.


You don't think a major player in the Democratic party, like Governor Tilden, had any say over his own Veep? Furthermore, Tilden was against emancipation when it came up during the Civil War. The Democratic Party platform was against Reconstruction as well.

So whether Hayes or Tilden won, Reconstruction was going to end.

quote:
Oh, come on. Do you evaluate Nixon based on your opinions of Ed Muskie and Sargant Shriver? Do you evaluate Bush based on your opinions of Edwards and Lieberman? That's a very...strange...way of looking at it.


Well.. yes. It's a very strange way of analyzing Presidents without looking at the context of their time and the possible opponents.

And Bush would be analyzed by comparing him to Gore/Lieberman and Kerry/Edwards and whether they would have done a better job. Both Lieberman and Edwards were fairly similar to their President-nominees in main beliefs.


Btw, some other things about Hayes:

http://elections.harpweek.com/09Ver...eID=1&Year=1876

quote:
Hayes took office with many Americans believing he had been elected by fraud, with a Democratic majority in the House (and also in the Senate after 1878), and with his own party divided into rival and often hostile factions. With diligence and integrity the new president was able to overcome some of those impediments. He was assisted by talented cabinet members, especially Secretary of State William Evarts, Treasury Secretary John Sherman, and Interior Secretary Carl Schurz. Hayes formally ended Reconstruction by removing the remaining federal troops from political duty in the South; he advanced the cause of civil service reform, laying the foundation for the latter passage of the Pendleton Act (1883); and he saw to the enforcement of the Resumption of Specie Act, which placed the United States back on the gold standard. His pragmatic, measured response to the Great Railroad Strike of 1877—remaining neutral between strikers and management, and only allowing the limited use of federal troops to keep the peace when state or local officials requested assistance—probably saved lives and property. By the end of his term, economic prosperity had returned. A supporter of a single-term presidency, he declined to run for reelection.

In retirement, Hayes continued to speak out on public issues, supporting veterans’ pensions and the federal regulation of business (e.g., the Interstate Commerce Act). Committed to the diffusion and progress of education, he served as trustee of the Peabody Fund, a charity aimed at educating poor Southern blacks and whites, and as first president of the Slater Fund, established to aid the education of blacks. He urged Congress to allocate monies to supplement educational funding in poor states and territories. He was on the board of trustees of The Ohio State University, Ohio Wesleyan University, and Western Reserve University. He also served as president of the National Prison Association, and opposed the death penalty.

Last edited by Imran Siddiqui on 15-01-2005 at 13:53

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 13:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#42 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Carter had notable successes including anti-corruption legislation, the signing of the first middle east peace agreement, strengthing consumer protection laws, and improving relations/pushing for democracy in Latin America. He wasn't one of the best but he sure wasn't won of the worst either.

Grant had to be the most corrupt man to ever be President; he got kick backs on his kick backs and he spent most of his time drunk.

Imran Siddiqui is offline Imran Siddiqui

Deity
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 13:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#43 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

Grant's drunkeness is highly exaggerated.

Oh, and there is little to no proof that Grant profited from any corruption in the White House, but he did do nothing when he found out about it.

molly bloom is offline molly bloom
Prince
Lundenwic
Oct 2001
time: 15:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 15:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#44 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Reagan, for not knowing his ethics from his elbow, and helping to prolong the life of the apartheid regime in South Africa, whilst also propping up a horde of tyrants, despots and dictators, from the Americas, through Africa to Asia, and giving aid to fanatics, war criminals and terrorists, all the time bleating about the Soviet Evil Empire.


Nixon- for doing his very level crooked, potty-mouthed, best, to demean an office which had once been filled by people of the calibre of Thomas Jefferson, who for all his faults, seems like St. Francis of Assisi in comparison.

Dauphin is offline Dauphin
Emperor
Caught in a tuna net
Jan 1970
time: 05:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 15:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#45 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by Agathon
How can anyone say that FDR is the worst? He's the best president the US ever had, as Churchill is the best Prime Minister the UK ever had.


Best wartime PM probably, but Churchill was an awful peacetime leader .

molly bloom is offline molly bloom
Prince
Lundenwic
Oct 2001
time: 15:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 15:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#46 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Dauphin


Best wartime PM probably, but Churchill was an awful peacetime leader .


Well, he had an excuse. He was ill, having suffered a stroke.

Giancarlo is offline Giancarlo
King
Los Angeles
Apr 2000
time: 02:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 16:00 Visit Giancarlo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#47 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

Who was the US president in 1881 and only served a month or something?

But anyways, Grant, not for his supposed drunkedness, but his tendency of appointing inexperienced friends to positions of high government office, and his inability to consoldiate the federal government.

Carter was a terrible president, presiding over a collapse of American confidence internationally and economically.

Dauphin is offline Dauphin
Emperor
Caught in a tuna net
Jan 1970
time: 05:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 17:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#48 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by molly bloom


Well, he had an excuse. He was ill, having suffered a stroke.


I don't think he would have been a particular notable peacetime leader if he had been in power in the 20s or 30s either.

VJ is offline VJ
Prince
Helsinki
Dec 2001
time: 07:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 19:19
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#49 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

JFK was the worst one in the 20th century... I haven't read enough to properly comment on the 19th century ones, and there aren't any really bad ones among the 18th century ones.

quote:
Winston, talking about Carter:
people, at least here, laughed at him just about everywhere he went.

You did? Hey, the whole nation of Egypt prayed just because of his hemorrhoids ... I wouldn't call that lack of respect.

quote:
All this on the backdrop of a scandalized Republican party, which should have given him an easy time

How was it scandalized? I'm not really sure what are you talking about...

quote:
pursuing his agenda, if he'd only had one...

You can blame Carter for many things, but not for lack of agenda. On the contrary, he was way too idealistic when it came to foreign policy.

quote:
Nixon- for doing his very level crooked, potty-mouthed, best, to demean an office which had once been filled by people of the calibre of Thomas Jefferson, who for all his faults, seems like St. Francis of Assisi in comparison.

Nixon kept the hippies in check and managed to end Vietnam... he should've surrendered sooner, though. Many useless casualties, same pathetic outcome.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 19:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#50 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

I'd have to nominate Warren Harding, who drank himself to death while still in office, and was once actually seen ******** his secretary in his office window. He was without a doubt America's Caligula.

Where the heck did you guys pull up the idea that that Wilson was a pedophile?

Regarding his failure to secure America's entry into the League of Nations, bear in mind that Willson fell ill even before returning to the US. There is good evidence that he may have suffered a small stroke while in Europe. His failure to enlist the co-operation of the US Congress can be attributed to a medical decline in his faculties. The rampant bigotry and chauvinism prevalent within the two American legislative bodies also has to be taken into account.

Finally, considering Wilson's support for "Seperate but Equal" remember that at the time when Wilson supported this doctrine, the 1880s, it was revolutionary and very controversial. Prior to "Seperate but Equal" the norm was "Seperate and Nothing". It was an uphill battle to convince the white male voting public to give black people anything, even the right to appear in public in proximity to white folks. When the NAACP appeared on the American scene at the turn of the century and began to demand true equality many of these white voters blamed liberals like Wilson.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 19:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#51 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by Giancarlo
.

Carter was a terrible president, presiding over a collapse of American confidence internationally and economically.


American confidence had already been decimated by Nixon, Ford, and Vietnam. Our alliance system was nearly in shambles, the armed forces were struggling to adjust to the end of the draft. Communist insurgencies were gaining throughout Africa and Latin America. Carter was at least a notably moral man and began to regain the trust of our allies. Of course the fact that the Commies stupidly applied terror tactics against our allies in Europe also helped. People forget that he also began the reversal of the tide of the Cold War by engaging Communist insurgents on the covert level. They also forget that the US economy was already in disarray after Ford's "WIN" fiasco and the oil embargos.

Heresson is offline Heresson
King
of frogs
Jun 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 19:48
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#52 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I don't know enough USA presidents to chose

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 20:04
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#53 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Originally posted by VJ
JFK was the worst one in the 20th century... I haven't read enough to properly comment on the 19th century ones, and there aren't any really bad ones among the 18th century ones.


You think JFK was worse then Hoover?

quote:

How was it scandalized? I'm not really sure what are you talking about...


Don't you remember about Nixon & Watergate?

quote:

Nixon kept the hippies in check and managed to end Vietnam... he should've surrendered sooner, though. Many useless casualties, same pathetic outcome.


I actually came to a totally different conclusion about Vietnam then surrendering earlier. The public was actually very supportive of the war for until about 1969 so Johnson should have really taken the gloves off and invaded North Vietnam in 1964-65 and threatened the Communist Chinese with war in Korea & Vietnam plus unlimited air and navel bombing unless they stopped supplying the NVA. The end of the Korean war showed the PRC would respect American demands if they were backed up with sufficent force. Notice how the PRC totally caved in when Eisenhower threatened total war with the PRC.

Heresson is offline Heresson
King
of frogs
Jun 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 20:07
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#54 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Could somebody make a list with short descriptions of qualifications?

VJ is offline VJ
Prince
Helsinki
Dec 2001
time: 07:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 20:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#55 Report this post to a moderator
Answers to Oerdin. Remove this text

quote:
You think JFK was worse then Hoover?

Hoover didn't really solve any problems but it's not like he was actively creating 'em either. Kennedy thought with his balls instead of his brains.

quote:
Don't you remember about Nixon & Watergate?

That was "scandalizing" republican party in 1980? Can't americans get over scandals quicker or something? I mean, Watergate was eight years before that. Are some people still obsessed with Clinton's penis eight years after Monica?

quote:
so Johnson should have really taken the gloves off and invaded North Vietnam in 1964-65 and threatened the Communist Chinese with war in Korea & Vietnam plus unlimited air and navel bombing unless they stopped supplying the NVA

Yes, I agree. But Nixon entered the White House in January 1969. With the hippies at the home front and civilians (EDIT: Vietnamese civilians, co-operating with the commies instead of US army) which had turned against US because of the use of draftees at the main front, there was little what Nixon could do anymore. Goldwater would've been an ideal president to solve US' problems in Vietnam.

Heresson, http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/

Last edited by VJ on 15-01-2005 at 20:22

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 20:23 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#56 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin
I actually came to a totally different conclusion about Vietnam then surrendering earlier. The public was actually very supportive of the war for until about 1969 so Johnson should have really taken the gloves off and invaded North Vietnam in 1964-65 and threatened the Communist Chinese with war in Korea & Vietnam plus unlimited air and navel bombing unless they stopped supplying the NVA.


So you're saying we should have started WWIII? China recently confirmed that they would have joined the war on behalf of the North had we invaded. I, personally, am glad the planet is still here, and not blown up to support a murderous dictatorship at the end of the Mekong Delta.

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 20:24 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#57 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Answers to Oerdin. Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by VJ
That was "scandalizing" republican party in 1980?


In the late 70s.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 21:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#58 Report this post to a moderator
Re: Answers to Oerdin. Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
Originally posted by VJ

Hoover didn't really solve any problems but it's not like he was actively creating 'em either. Kennedy thought with his balls instead of his brains.
Hoover was a major supporter of the Taft-Smoot-Hawley Act, a xenophobic bit of legislation which restricted foreign investment in the US. At that time foreigners held about 15% of US stock holdings. Black Friday occurred shortly after the introduction of this bill as foreign investors stampeded to get out of the US stock market, fearing that their holdings were going to be liquidated. So yes, Hoover did indeed create a problem. OTOH the legislation was bipartisan, so the whole US government had a part in creating the Great Depression. Unfortunately the act was so popular that it could not be rescinded until WW2.
quote:

That was "scandalizing" republican party in 1980? Can't americans get over scandals quicker or something? I mean, Watergate was eight years before that. Are some people still obsessed with Clinton's penis eight years after Monica?
I heard another Clinton joke just the other day, so yes, they are. You don't know us very well.
quote:


Yes, I agree. But Nixon entered the White House in January 1969. With the hippies at the home front and civilians (EDIT: Vietnamese civilians, co-operating with the commies instead of US army) which had turned against US because of the use of draftees at the main front, there was little what Nixon could do anymore. Goldwater would've been an ideal president to solve US' problems in Vietnam.

Heresson, http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/presidents/

Unless Goldwater were planning on keeping us out of Vietnam entirely I doubt he would have done better. The problem is that "containment" was very popular at the time so he would have had a great deal of difficulty keeping us out of Vietnam. In fact, Goldwater had close ties with the John Birch society, so he would have been greatly pressured to commit troops to Vietnam.

Heresson is offline Heresson
King
of frogs
Jun 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 21:15
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#59 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Thanks for the link

Heresson is offline Heresson
King
of frogs
Jun 2000
time: 06:30
  Old Post 15-01-2005 21:16
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#60 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

... but it does not work

 
Pages (8): [ 1   2   3   4   5     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30.
Apolyton Time is 00:30.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0675 seconds (92.09% PHP - 7.91% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net