 |
|
ahenobarb
|
|
Interesting thread... until Captain Binary Logic showed up.
Just want to add that I think it's a great day for Iraq and the world. I wish them luck and success with their new nation. " A Republic, if you can keep it" to paraphrase Ben Franklin.
5 down, 1 to go for the democracy six pack:
Australia - John Howard
U.S. - Bush
Ukraine - Yushenko
Palestine - Mahmoud Abbas
Iraq - TDB
and...
Britain - Blair
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:28
|
|
quote: What's that got to do with anything? |
You said, and I quote:
quote: I've said it before and I'll say it again, the success of Iraqis will be despite the US. |
So, what success did they have under Saddam? Tis such a simple question 
quote: Is the Bush admin's complicity in the whole Iraq mess wiped clean by the fact that Saddam was removed? |
Why are you dodging my question and changing the subject?
quote: "At least we're better than Saddam" does not an excuse make. |
We're a lot better, but should the US have stayed out of WWII because we were better than Hitler? Kinda bizarre statement, dontchya think?
quote: Edit: to make an example, if I can run the Iraq reconstruction funds and lose only 8 billion dollars of American taxpayer money in a black hole instead of 9, does it mean I get a free pass for losing those 8 billion dollars? |
So because Bush et al did bad or dumb things in the process of removing Saddam, the Iraqis will succeed inspite of the US? You aren't even trying to defend what you said...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jaakko
|
 |
in Yellow
Jan 2000 time: 07:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
You said, and I quote:
So, what success did they have under Saddam? Tis such a simple question 
Why are you dodging my question and changing the subject?
We're a lot better, but should the US have stayed out of WWII because we were better than Hitler? Kinda bizarre statement, dontchya think?
So because Bush et al did bad or dumb things in the process of removing Saddam, the Iraqis will succeed inspite of the US? You aren't even trying to defend what you said... |
Dear mr. Dissect-o-man, I'll reply to your post as a whole because it'll get disjointed and loses context otherwise. I would be much obliged if you could do the same.
Now, the Iraqis not having success under Saddam (which is obviously true) doesn't mean that the US is not an impediment to success. That happens on the merits of US' actions. For sure, they're a far lesser impediment than SH ever was, but I stand by my assertion that an impediment is what the US has been, and from the looks of it continues to be. As evidence, I give the deterioriation of the situation in Iraq, consistently contrary to the claims of pro-US boosters.
Rebuilding was a sham, even the elections had to be pushed for by Sistani et al. The sunnis continue to be alienated, civil war edging ever closer. A US administration that speculates on the use of death squads to scare them into submission must surely be inadequate in the task of stabilising the situation.
The bottom line is, "we're better than Saddam" does not a success make. Just saying that and patting oneself in the back is to ignore the still ongoing plight of many, many Iraqis.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:28
|
|
I have always felt humbled by the sight of people who either get to vote for the first time (the long, long queues of first time black voters in South Africa) or those who will risk their lives to exercise a right that most of us in the West take for granted: the franchise.
I do not see any discernible difference between the 'insurgents', or as I like to call them, undemocractic murdering fascists, and the likes of UNITA, Renamo, the Contras or El Salvador's and Guatemala's paramilitaries.
Their targets?
Schools, hospitals, civilians.
Their weapons?
Not education, or persuasion, but bullets, explosives and suicide bombings.
Their purpose?
Not 'liberation' but disruption, intimidation and domination.
This is the right election, entirely possibly for the wrong reasons, and not under the best circumstances, but it is people deciding their own futures, and not being told by a secret police force, or theocratic militants, who to vote for.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
WRT Cole, and some other points
1. I followed the prewar debate. I certainly recall Cole as a determined opponent of US intervention. NEVER a proponent. There ARE several proponents who have become highly critical of the admin, including Andrew Sullivan Daniel Drezner, and a whole batch of folks at the New Republic. I dont think Cole is among them.
2. Why the f*** does Bush wavering on elections have anything to do with US media boosterism? The celebration in the headlines was for the people of Iraq, for democracy, and for the success of what US troops and the American people (and our allies in the coalition of the willing) have done, NOT for Bush et al. NOT everything is about Bush.
3. In any case, is wavering automatically bad? Its said the Bushies are stubborn and never change course when what they do is mistaken - in fact the history of the Iraq situation shows that they DO change course in response to facts on the ground - they just dont admit it.
4. The election happened under attack - so did the first election East Timor - the Timorese went on to build democracy - what was STRIKING was the courage of the Iraqis wrt the violence - also who little there was on election day compared to what was expected.
5. PR - well i agree single member districts would have been better - but there were reasons for PR, advanced by the UN rep. Its hardly a fatal flaw.
6. My impression, from media interviews, is that they were voting to take control of their country, to keep the past from coming back. Some may have voted to get the US out - and even those were right, this IS the best way to get US troops out - but it will take time, and I think they have patience.
7. Clerical govt - ive seen numerous reports that UIA has said precisely that there will be NO clerics at the top of the govt.
8. Sharia as personal (family and inheritance) law - that will be a controversial issue for sure, and i understand why feminists dont care for it. However it would hardly make Iraq at all like Iran - almost every muslim country in the middle east has sharia as personal law, and even Israel has a modified form of Sharia as personal law for muslims.
9. Turnout numbers - The 72% seems to have been an error, 60% looks good, we'll know more, but in any case it was substantial.
10. does anyone remember back when Allawi was first chosen, when SOME people said he was a new dictator, and elections would never take place, theyd be endlessly deferred based on some declaration of emergency?
Congratulations to the Iraqi people on their courage and determination.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|