 |
|
Wycoff
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Immortal Wombat
Perhaps the one who know why they're rebellious are, but there are plenty of disruptive or destructive students who either can't or won't do the work because it's beyond them, or doesn't suit them. |
... or because they're just a ssholes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
aneeshm
|
 |
Indore , Madhya Pradesh
Jul 2001 time: 10:47
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Well, my concern is this thread, so far, has only to do with discipline. I didn't adress the question of gifted vs slow students, but only between those who behave and those who don't.
What I call the "few bad apples" are few. They are naturally rebellious against the rules of the school, and they make a mess that hurts the schooling's quality. They are also natural leaders, who convince weaker-willed kids (the great bunch of "followers") to follow their example and make a mess.
I consider the "followers" (= the bulk) not to be bad apples. I consider those few rebellious leaders to be the ones that should be isolated. The "followers", once they're in an environment where no charismatic leader opposes school work, will behave acceptably well as to not make serious problems for the class.
When I'm speaking about discipline, I'm not speaking about the usual chit-chat that happens in a classroom, or to the occasional prank, because those are normal in all sane schools. I'm speaking about the systematic undermining of a teacher's ability to teach. When indiscipline is a serious problem, you bet there's a bad apple somewhere that's spoiling many fellows. |
Do you not think that if the followers see the fesults of following , they will improve ?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
You discount the ability of a teacher to control the room. Consider substitutes . . we had one that ended up leaving in tears pretty much every time she subbed. Obviously we were an undisciplined rabble right ??? Yet other substitutes had control of the room within 1 minute of the first time they encountered us.
My dad ( a teacher for 30 years) claimed that his education was almost irrelevant to his ability to control the room. he thought we would be much better served if prospective teachers were given a short 6 week training program and then tossed in the classroom ( WITHOUT the regular teacher there)-- He believed that those that could not control the room in that situation were unlikely to ever be in control of their classroom. Those that could convey or teach something would make the good teachers and should be the ones that would learn all the proper methods. |
Good point. In my life I've been to public schools, religious schools, poor schools, rich schools, community colleges, huge state universities, and numerous military schools. The best quality day in and day out was in the military. They had a simple system that taught everyone from the Ivy league grad in my basic training company to the dude with severe learning disabilities.
The base for their system was that they simply did not allow discipline problems. Ever. They'd present the material, give the students a chance to work with the concepts, and then test them at a minimum once a week, but typically more often. Those that passed the test the first time became tutors for those who didn't. The process was repeated until everyone passed or the allotted time ran out. Those who still couldn't master the skills or material being taught were held back while everyone else went on to the next lesson. I swear that many people learned more in the 8 weeks of basic training than they did in their last year of high school.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|