 |
| |
|
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:28
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Boshko
Her brain is jelly. |
Not all of it. Read the judges opinion. She retains some of her cerebral cortex.
Last edited by Ned on 28-03-2005 at 10:25
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Ned
|
|
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:28
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by GePap
Oh, of course, 40 judges including the supreme court 3 times have all ignored the devine messages you got that there is no evidence
Give it up, its now getting obnoxious and boring. |
She is not in a coma, can talk, can laugh, can cry and is aware of her surroundings. She has some of her cerebral cortex left. Whether she can improve from THIS state to be what she once was is hopeless because most of her brain is gone. The judge made his final conclusion in the original case with these words:
"Those statements above noted contain no limitations or conditions. However, as Mrs. Tyler noted when she testified as to quality of life being a primary criteria and artificial life support matters, Americans want to "try it for a while" but they do not wish to live on it with no hope of improvement. That implicit condition has long since been satisfied in this case."
Thus the judge in this case condemned Terry to die because she had no hope for improvement even though her parents were satisfied with Terry in state she is in an even though Terri has apparently stated herself, last Friday, that she wanted to live.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:28
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Ned
She is not in a coma, can talk, can laugh, can cry and is aware of her surroundings. She has some of her cerebral cortex left. Whether she can improve from THIS state to be what she once was is hopeless because most of her brain is gone. The judge made his final conclusion in the original case with these words:
"Those statements above noted contain no limitations or conditions. However, as Mrs. Tyler noted when she testified as to quality of life being a primary criteria and artificial life support matters, Americans want to "try it for a while" but they do not wish to live on it with no hope of improvement. That implicit condition has long since been satisfied in this case."
Thus the judge in this case condemned Terry to die because she had no hope for improvement even though her parents were satisfied with Terry in state she is in an even though Terri has apparently stated herself, last Friday, that she wanted to live. |
Ned, this is the last time I will address you on this subject because you have obviously gone off your rockers. She does NOt speak, nor does she laugh, or do any of the things you claim. Who do you think you are foling at this point?
We have heard the families thinly vailed propaganda, and YOU seem to be the only one even of the people who support the parents to have swallowed it fully hook line and sinker. Its pretty sad.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Ned - first of all, considering the states involved, average appointees, etc. I doubt that 21 of the minimum 40 judges involved are qualified as "liberal" judges. Heck, I doubt you can find more than a dozen who the liberals would consider as one of theirs.
Secondly, I have watched the tragic attempts of family to make the best out of terrible cases of brain damage. Some friends had a child who at 6 and 1/2 (she died at that age due to an accident related to her neurological impairments, there were other associated problems) still could not babble.
Yet the parents, who insisted on mainstreaming her, were trying to find that she was attempting to say "mama" out of her rythmic grunts. It was so sad, and none of use even tried to tell them how wrong they were, they were just trying to see some kind of hope out of a terrible situation. The man was part of my wedding party, these were not just casual friends.
After 10 to 14 minutes of no pulse, her brain is largely dead. Find me one cite, except in the cases of immersion in cold water, where after that much time the individual has not been severely brain damaged. Thank God, literally, that she is finally going on to whatever awaits her.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Imran Siddiqui
|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:28
|
|
quote:
It is curious that Judge Greer said the Schindlers has an adverse interest because they would inherit from Terri if they were appointed guardian, completely ignoring that the whole object of the Schindlers is to keep Terri alive!!!!! |
Well he's totally right. Yeah, they are 'fighting to keep Terri alive', but what happens if they get guardianship? Will they fight as hard then? If Michael has an adverse interest, so do the Schindlers. They'd inherit if they got guardianship.
quote:
But the nurses have said the same thing about Terri. Now Terri's priest has chimed in.
Now, you say all this is Schindler propaganda. I have not cited the Schindlers in anything I have said. I have provided links and have cited people independent of the Schindlers and have repeatedly asked why these people should lie? |
Nurse(s)? Aside from the one nurse, which other ones have said she is talking and carrying on conversations? Also, the priest isn't conflicted at all  . He's the freaking Schinder's PRIEST, of course he's on the "she's alive, ALIVE" side. You think the Schindler's would have a priest that thought Terry was no more?
quote:
I doubt that 21 of the minimum 40 judges involved are qualified as "liberal" judges. |
OF COURSE they are, because they disagree with Ned... didn't you know that Shawn?  They have to be liberals, because no conservative real American judge would be against Ned! Nosiree!
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28.
Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
28-03-2005 08:59
Attachment: 
(on neD)
|
