 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
war on 2 fronts...cmon!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
you know what i mean boris, dividing your resources up among 2 enemies...bad bad bad
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
IMO
The biggest single mistake was the German persecution and genocide of the Jewish people. This was a large drain on resources and in fact eliminated or caused to flee some of the best scientific minds available. Thow those resources and men into the actual war effort, deny many scientists to Allies and have them working for the AXIS and who knows what weapons might have beendeveloped.
But again, this would require Hitler to not be Hitler.
With the coalitions as they stood, I can't see any scenario in which the Axis win unless the Allies make horrific mistakes or some new super-weapon became available.
The US was coming into the war regardless of Pearl Harbour. It was just a matter of when
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
My great uncle died on a bombing run and my grandfather served in Italy. Point is, until troops were on the ground in France, no one consided German to be fighting a two-front war, not the Allies, not the Germans, not the Soviets. Germany did not have to divert significant resources to the Italian campaign, like they did with France. And Murmansk was part of the Eastern Front. |
Churchill certainly considered that he had a second front going, IIRC. I think FDR did too. We can quibble over what serious resources are - I suggest Robert Overy on German resources devoted to Tunisia, Italy, the West Wall, and to air defence. And I dont see how the North Atlantic is part of the eastern front. Are you saying British seamen died on the eastern front?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
As I said in a previous thread, once the Germans DoW'd the U.S., it was all over but for the mopping up. They should have let the Japanese take the heat for their mistake, but like the Japanese, they believed we were soft and unwilling to fight. I don't know why anyone ever thought that about us, though. |
cause we were the worlds first consumer society, and conventionally soft life is supposed to make you weak. And to Hitler, we were racial mongrels, "judaized" in the north, and "negrified" in the south (someone wasnt thinking of Judah Maccabee or Shaka Zulu, let alone of a realistic view of US demographics)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|