Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Off-Topic > Biggest Mistakes the Axis made iyo.
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!
20.Sep: FOURTH CHAPTER IN `HISTORY OF...` PUBLISHED
13.Sep: NEWS ON THE FLY
06.Sep: APOLYTON DONATES TO HURRICANE RELIEF

bottom of page
   - CIVILIZATION 3 $9.99 - CIVILIZATION 2 from $6.95 - CIVILIZATION 2 from $4.25 - ALPHA CENTAURI + ALIEN CROSSFIRE (laptop collection) from $19.99 - ALPHA CENTAURI PC $9.99 -->
Author
Thread   
Pages (17): [ <<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Tingkai is offline Tingkai
Warlord
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001
time: 13:31
  Old Post 08-04-2005 21:47
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#211 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by Sikander
There are numerous instances of generals complaining about the logistics and other operational limitations which made their goals in the end unrealistic. Several were sacked immediately while others were made to understand that their orders were not negotiable.

No, generals were sacked during the winter of 41-42 for not holding their ground. No generals were sacked for not attacking deep into the Soviet Union during the summer offenses.

Had the Germans advanced half as far, they still would have achieved a major victory, and they would have been in a better position to defend their lines.

The German generals were reckless and paid the price for their stupidity.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 08-04-2005 21:50
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#212 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Tingkai


No Ned, you claim that the lack of heavy bombers is proof that Germany did not want to fight Britain. That is completely wrong.

The German medium-range bombers were able to hit British targets, including aircraft factories. One of the major Spitfire factories was near Birmingham which got plastered during the blitz.

More than that, if theory was right then Germany never planned to attack the Soviet Union because one of the German's great failure was not having long-range bombers to hit distant Soviet factories.

Your theory, Ned, has been pwn'd


Then, the earlier post about Germany owning Britain had the had long range bomber must be incorrect.

BTW, the Ural factories were move there in response to the German invasion. This was hardly to be "expected." So the lack of German bomber able to hit the Ural factories says nothing about Hitler's plans vis-a-vis the USSR.

VJ is offline VJ
Prince
Helsinki
Dec 2001
time: 07:31
  Old Post 08-04-2005 21:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#213 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Not crushing British at Dunkirk -- > no peace treaty with the UK

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 08-04-2005 22:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#214 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Here is an excellent analysis of what would have happened had Germany move four divisions and an air wing to Africa in the summer of 1940. They win the war.

http://www.changingthetimes.co.uk/s...issing_year.htm

Tingkai is offline Tingkai
Warlord
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001
time: 13:31
  Old Post 08-04-2005 23:13
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#215 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by Ned
BTW, the Ural factories were move there in response to the German invasion. This was hardly to be "expected." So the lack of German bomber able to hit the Ural factories says nothing about Hitler's plans vis-a-vis the USSR.


You can't have it both ways Ned. You're pwn'd.

The Lancaster was developed in about a year. The Germans had time to develop long-range bombers.

The reason the Germans didn't was because they never understood the importance of strategic bombing. They never understood the importance of destroying supply lines. Instead, they focused on destorying military unit. Throughout the war, the Germans never seriously disrupted the Russian supply routes behidn the lines. Yet another example of the German stupidity during the war.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 00:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#216 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

One year?

Well, if that is true, Germany could have had long range bombers in 1941 and could have invaded Britain that same year, or at least by 1942.

One wonders whether there was a screw loose in German strategic thinking if there was a deliberate decision to forgo developing a long range bomber early in the war.

Oncle Boris is offline Oncle Boris
Prince
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001
time: 00:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 03:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#217 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Tingkai


No Ned, you claim that the lack of heavy bombers is proof that Germany did not want to fight Britain. That is completely wrong.

The German medium-range bombers were able to hit British targets, including aircraft factories. One of the major Spitfire factories was near Birmingham which got plastered during the blitz.

More than that, if theory was right then Germany never planned to attack the Soviet Union because one of the German's great failure was not having long-range bombers to hit distant Soviet factories.

Your theory, Ned, has been pwn'd


OK, you're actually right on the bomber issue. A point remains, though: Germany didn't have any medium-range fighter to escort the bombers to Britain. If they didn't develop any, there must be a reason for it, right?

Urban Ranger is offline Urban Ranger
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic

Donate to the Red Cross
The City State of Noosphere, CPA special envoy
May 1999
time: 13:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 09:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#218 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote:
Originally posted by shawnmmcc
Ned - Stalin eventually wanted to turn all of Europe into a great Commintern.


IIRC, Stalin was not interested in exporting communism. That's Trotsky.

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 10:25 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#219 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Stalin declared "Socialism in one country" but that was for tactical reason, part of an effort to end the Soviet Union's isolation in the face of the rise fascism. Then he did another backflip for similar tactical reasons - to avoid early invasion - by signing the Nazi Soviet Pact. Throughout the period Soviet agents were as active as ever spreading communism. Of course once the Red Army got into Europe every country they liberated was turned into a Soviet Satellite state.

Bosh is offline Bosh
Emperor
Taehan Mingook
Jan 1970
time: 00:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 12:41
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#220 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger


IIRC, Stalin was not interested in exporting communism. That's Trotsky.


Stalin was interested in whatever was tactically convenient. Do some reading on Soviet involvement in the Spanish Civil War.

Kalius is offline Kalius
Emperor
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002
time: 16:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 13:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#221 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

quote:
OK, you're actually right on the bomber issue. A point remains, though: Germany didn't have any medium-range fighter to escort the bombers to Britain. If they didn't develop any, there must be a reason for it, right?


Well, he Me109 was chosen as the main fighter of the German army back in the mid 1930s over the He100. Even then, it took around 5 years for a plane to go from prototype to the real, fully fledged fighting plane. The Me262 is an excellent example of this. They had, after roughly 3 years of development, about a half-strength fleet of Me262s. The Me109 was chosen as the be-all fighter of Luftwaffe, and as the Luftwaffe was still growing, it made sense to choose one fighter, make a huge number of them, and you'd be set.

Originally, the Me109 was chosen over the He100 mainly because it was more stable, easier to fix, and was very quick on landing. Too quick, in fact. By the time the He100 caught up, the Me109 was already in full fledged production and there simply weren't enough engines to go around at the time. It was faster, more stable and had a larger range than the Me109, but, it was too late.

Time had run out, and the Luftwaffe only had the capacity to make one choice. They merely said the Me109 was "good enough".

molly bloom is offline molly bloom
Prince
Lundenwic
Oct 2001
time: 15:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 14:02
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#222 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by Urban Ranger


IIRC, Stalin was not interested in exporting communism. That's Trotsky.



You should read Orwell's 'Homage to Catalonia' on how the Stalinist left split the anti-Franco forces in Republican Spain.

Admittedly Soviet Russia was one of the few states to send materiel to the Republic in the same way that the Nazi/Fascist states did to the Francoist side, but when you sup with the devil you should use a long spoon....

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 14:07 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#223 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

Homage to Catalonia is a wonderful book.

Dis is offline Dis
Emperor
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000
time: 21:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 14:15 Visit Dis's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#224 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I don't have the balls to taunt the mods anymore. Someone needs to make a thread titled: Biggest mistakes the neutrals made iyo.

Kalius is offline Kalius
Emperor
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002
time: 16:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 14:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#225 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Biggest mistakes the neutrals made iyo.


Being stuck next to Germany. And France. And water.

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 15:23 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#226 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

How about starting WWII, that was a bit of a howler of a bad decision for the Axis powers wasn't it?

Look at Germany and Japan and Italy today, they all do rather well without having to send in the troops.

molly bloom is offline molly bloom
Prince
Lundenwic
Oct 2001
time: 15:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 15:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#227 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

quote:
Originally posted by Oncle Boris


Why do we even call them the Axis powers, if it weren't for any treaty?



Oh, right, adhering to treaties, otherwise the Allies won't call them the Axis powers...


I think you lost the plot somewhere, or you're having difficulties understanding my point.


The Japanese militarists could have broken the treaty with the Soviet Union when it was attacked by Nazi Germany- after all it's not like the war regime in Japan felt noticeably bound to slavishly follow to the letter other treaties.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 18:41
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#228 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton

quote:
Originally posted by Kalius


Well, he Me109 was chosen as the main fighter of the German army back in the mid 1930s over the He100. Even then, it took around 5 years for a plane to go from prototype to the real, fully fledged fighting plane. The Me262 is an excellent example of this. They had, after roughly 3 years of development, about a half-strength fleet of Me262s. The Me109 was chosen as the be-all fighter of Luftwaffe, and as the Luftwaffe was still growing, it made sense to choose one fighter, make a huge number of them, and you'd be set.

Originally, the Me109 was chosen over the He100 mainly because it was more stable, easier to fix, and was very quick on landing. Too quick, in fact. By the time the He100 caught up, the Me109 was already in full fledged production and there simply weren't enough engines to go around at the time. It was faster, more stable and had a larger range than the Me109, but, it was too late.


At the time of the Battle of Britain the Germans did have the twin engined Me 110 which was originally designed as a long range fighter. Unfortunately it did not perform well against the Spitfire and the Hurricane and was quickly removed from that role.

Alexander's Horse is offline Alexander's Horse
Deity
Panmunjon, hands up!
Jan 1970
time: 15:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 19:14 Visit Alexander's Horse's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#229 Report this post to a moderator
Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

didn't perform well? it was a piece of junk

Boris Godunov is offline Boris Godunov
King
Portland, OR
Aug 2001
time: 00:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 20:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#230 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

It's well-known from Hitler's own writings and those of his inner circle that he didn't want the war with Britain and was dismayed that the British were unwilling to negotiate peace. Hitler's chief goal had always been eastward expansion and an attack on the USSR. Keep in mind that he loathed Bolshevism as much as he loathed Jews--in fact, he considered them part and parcel with one another.

And as for the supply line issue in Barbarossa, we also have to acknowledge the problem generated by the SS. The Wehrmacht was dismayed by the SS following them up and instituting terrors in the occupied regions. The resistances spawned by SS atrocities were a major factor in the hampering of German supply lines.

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 21:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#231 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Some units however gleefully competed with the SS to see who could kill more Jews and Soviet civilians. I believe this was particularily true in Army Group South.

Oncle Boris is offline Oncle Boris
Prince
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001
time: 00:31
  Old Post 09-04-2005 22:22
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#232 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by molly bloom



Oh, right, adhering to treaties, otherwise the Allies won't call them the Axis powers...


I think you lost the plot somewhere, or you're having difficulties understanding my point.


The Japanese militarists could have broken the treaty with the Soviet Union when it was attacked by Nazi Germany- after all it's not like the war regime in Japan felt noticeably bound to slavishly follow to the letter other treaties.


From my part, I remember reading in Keegan that Hitler's decision to declare war to America was in large part based on the treaty with Japan.

He may have underestimated America, but I doubt he would have declared war without any reason - he would, to the least, have waited for them to join on their own.

BTW, haven't you ever heard of the term "the Berlin-Rome-Tokyo Axis"? IIRC it was explicitly used in the tripartite treaty they signed in 1936.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 10-04-2005 02:05
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#233 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Kalius


Well, he Me109 was chosen as the main fighter of the German army back in the mid 1930s over the He100. Even then, it took around 5 years for a plane to go from prototype to the real, fully fledged fighting plane. The Me262 is an excellent example of this. They had, after roughly 3 years of development, about a half-strength fleet of Me262s. The Me109 was chosen as the be-all fighter of Luftwaffe, and as the Luftwaffe was still growing, it made sense to choose one fighter, make a huge number of them, and you'd be set.

Originally, the Me109 was chosen over the He100 mainly because it was more stable, easier to fix, and was very quick on landing. Too quick, in fact. By the time the He100 caught up, the Me109 was already in full fledged production and there simply weren't enough engines to go around at the time. It was faster, more stable and had a larger range than the Me109, but, it was too late.

Time had run out, and the Luftwaffe only had the capacity to make one choice. They merely said the Me109 was "good enough".


If it take three years (or more) to develop a fighter, I hardly think the Germans could have develop a long range bomber in one.

This all suggests that the Germans had no plans for going to war with Britain and that Britain force war on them against their will. This supports my underlying thesis that the greatest German mistake was underestimating the Brits.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 10-04-2005 02:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#234 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
How about starting WWII, that was a bit of a howler of a bad decision for the Axis powers wasn't it?

Look at Germany and Japan and Italy today, they all do rather well without having to send in the troops.


In truth, it was the Brits who started WWII.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 10-04-2005 02:08
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#235 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Originally posted by Boris Godunov
It's well-known from Hitler's own writings and those of his inner circle that he didn't want the war with Britain and was dismayed that the British were unwilling to negotiate peace. Hitler's chief goal had always been eastward expansion and an attack on the USSR. Keep in mind that he loathed Bolshevism as much as he loathed Jews--in fact, he considered them part and parcel with one another.

And as for the supply line issue in Barbarossa, we also have to acknowledge the problem generated by the SS. The Wehrmacht was dismayed by the SS following them up and instituting terrors in the occupied regions. The resistances spawned by SS atrocities were a major factor in the hampering of German supply lines.


Agreed. The war with Britain was unintended. The SS destroyed any remote possibility of a win in Russia.

Kalius is offline Kalius
Emperor
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002
time: 16:31
  Old Post 10-04-2005 02:24
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#236 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
If it take three years (or more) to develop a fighter, I hardly think the Germans could have develop a long range bomber in one.

This all suggests that the Germans had no plans for going to war with Britain and that Britain force war on them against their will. This supports my underlying thesis that the greatest German mistake was underestimating the Brits.


You have the remember the Luftwaffe was completely nuked by Versailles. By the time they started rebuilding it, they had NO manufacturing capacity or wide-spread experience in building the things, and those that did have it were overly rusty. They had no engines by the time they decided "Yep, let's make a Luftwaffe", nor did they have any major manufacturing plants designed for building planes.

It took them a few years to sort this out, and another few to sort out a fighter to choose. By this time it was around 1937 and they thought the Me109 was simply good enough. Now they have some experience, plans are drawn up, and they can develop planes faster.

The Brits on the other hand didn't stop their RAF production, and the Hurricanes and Spitfires were the result of many years offine tuning over the inter-war period. For the record, the Avro Lancaster was developed in less than a year, the prototype flying in 1941, and the fully fledged squadron entering service in early 1942.The Handley-Page Halifax took just over a year. In stark contrast, the Ju-88 took nearly 3 years to enter service, The He-111 took 2 years, and the He-177, the only heavy bomber used by Germany in WWII, took 3-4 years to enter service.

Kalius is offline Kalius
Emperor
Kriegsgewitter
Aug 2002
time: 16:31
  Old Post 10-04-2005 02:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#237 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
At the time of the Battle of Britain the Germans did have the twin engined Me 110 which was originally designed as a long range fighter. Unfortunately it did not perform well against the Spitfire and the Hurricane and was quickly removed from that role.


That one took 3 years to develop as well because Germany simply had no engines. And what a piece of crap it was as well.

molly bloom is offline molly bloom
Prince
Lundenwic
Oct 2001
time: 15:31
  Old Post 10-04-2005 18:01
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#238 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Oncle Boris




BTW, haven't you ever heard of the term "the Berlin-Rome-Tokyo Axis"? IIRC it was explicitly used in the tripartite treaty they signed in 1936.



Oh for goodness' sake, yes of course I've heard of it.


What I'm saying is, and I'll state this as simply as possible, is that the military regime in Japan 'could' have broken any number of treaties with the Soviet Union.

What do you think was going to happen ?

That they wouldn't have done that because they were afraid future historians would no longer be able to refer to them as the Axis ?

Dr Strangelove is offline Dr Strangelove
King
USA
Jan 1970
time: 00:31
  Old Post 10-04-2005 18:28
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#239 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

As I implied above, by late 1941 Hitler was spoiling for a fight with the US. From late 1939 until the end of 1941 the maritime war zone, the region in which the germans declared that they would sink anything they wanted to had been confined to the eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. The Kriegsmarine was getting ready to shift it's submarine campaign from the eastern Atlantic to the western Atlantic and Carribean. Surely someone must have realised that such a move would increase the sinking of American ships and that the US would never have been able to accept the extension of the maritme war zone to include the entire Atlantic and Carribean outside of its 3 mile territorial limit. I doubt that FDR would have had any trouble getting Congress to declare war after the first couple of American tankers and freighters had been sunk off the coast of Florida.

molly bloom is offline molly bloom
Prince
Lundenwic
Oct 2001
time: 15:31
  Old Post 10-04-2005 18:31
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#240 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by Ned


In truth, it was the Brits who started WWII.



Of course, when they had an Anschluss with the Republic of Ireland, demanded territory from Iceland and invaded Sweden.


Time for your Geritol.

 
Pages (17): [ <<   5   6   7   8   9   10   11     >> ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31.
Apolyton Time is 00:31.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0553 seconds (90.05% PHP - 9.95% MySQL) with 30 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net