 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Agathon
|
 |
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Yes, of course it is. Do you think it�s ok to have sex with dogs, or chicken, or kids or comatose people for that matter? |
I think all of these are wrong, but I don't think you can make the case in terms of consent. Having sex with a person without their consent is wrong, but it doesn't follow from that, that having sex with a being who cannot consent must be wrong.
quote: We�re not talking dog on dog sex here. We�re talking human on dog sex. Which is wrong because a animal can�t consent, since this is limited to adult humans. |
You've given no reason to exclude dog on dog sex. If a dog tried to have sex with a human being, this would be a bad thing if the human being told it to go away. Similarly we could agree that dog on dog rape was a bad thing for the raped dog. But that has nothing to do with normal cases of dog sex which dogs seem to enjoy.
Why does the dogs consent matter just because it is a person rather than another dog? You need to show why this is different, rather than just repeating yourself.
quote: Sex with a non-consenting partner is wrong because both should be in on it. And since animals can�t consent it�s wrong to have sex with animals. Doesn�t sound like a spurious reason to me... |
You still haven't explained why it's not wrong for animals to have sex with each other then, given that they can't consent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:33
|
|
dude, could we please not turn this into a thread about ****ing sheep
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|