 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:19
|
|
And this is why christian right is dangerous. They claim all the time how everyone is picking on them so they need to be vigilant in a way.
But we all know, words get thrown back and forth, they judging the rest of us people, and we getting angry about it and shouting back.
But the fact is.... it's them who will destroy us all if they have the chance to. They wouldn't blink or think twice to murder tens of thousands. Muslims, gays, you name it. The pussies of them will not accept it, by silently tolerate it. They will have some nightmares over it, say few prayers, but they will never ever leave that crowd. They just hope that it would never happen again, and since the core is the same, they must stay together.
It's that part of the group of people who have started more wars, on whose values wars have been started, what the rest of us like to call useless wars, non-defensive wars etc. It is those people who put us against muslims, and from muslim side put against us. At the end of the day, we disagree, but we almost must fight because it's not up to us anymore, a fight is a fight but let's not forget who salivated over it the most, who believes it's doing God's work.
Some might claim, well, they would never accept any kind of behaviour like th at, but the fact is, only few of them will stand up and fight back the tyranny and the absolute power of religious right.
My point is, no matter who shouts what, religious right is DANGEROUS to all of us, where as kids who shout something stupid are not dangerous. And it's the kid who we go after. Go figure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:19
|
|
Just a couple of more points on the arrest, according to the arrest warrant, http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archiv...coulter_1.html, children under 10 were present in the audience, the speaker made repeated obscene gestures after he asked the obscene question as he moved back to the rear of the audience where the protesters were grouped, and he nearly caused a riot as the Ann Coulter supporters, who were physically present at the front of the theater, were outraged at the question and behavior of the protester and made moves to physically restrain him before the cops moved in and arrested him. In other words, there well may have been a riot but for the arrest.
Assuming that the facts as stated in the war are true, does this change anybody's mind about whether the arrest was valid or not?
For example, should the police have arrested anybody trying to physically restrain the protester?
Should the police have arrested and Coulter?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|