 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
the reality is the Quebec would be non-economically viable |

Last edited by Richelieu on 21-05-2005 at 06:56
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Spiff, I am sure you could work out the details on a reunion. As to Q wanting to be independent, I would think that would depend on how you asked the question. If you asked them "from whom?", you might learn a little more about their real asperations. |
Independence Ned. The word says it.
quote:
But, is there anything fundamentally incompatible in between the legal systems of Canada and France that would prevent the Quebecers and French from forming a single country? |
The incompatibility does not lie in the legal systems. I don't see why the french would be interested in such a relationship, but i can assure you that we sure are not.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Alright, why? A lot of Americans could see the Brits and the US re-united, but on some basis of equality. |
I doubt there are that many, on either side of the pound, who would see the US and the UK unite.
As for Quebec's situation, i cannot see one single reason why we would want to do that.
You say: "why not?" I say:"why?"
What could we possibly gain from any type of association with France?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Alright, why? A lot of Americans could see the Brits and the US re-united, but on some basis of equality. |
Oh, that's just silly. We're 6 times larger and have an economy better than 15 times larger. California has a larger economy.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|