 |
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Under ideal communism, all women should make love for "free." Marriage is obsolete. There should be no need for prostitution. But, assuming there was still a demand, the women would have to work for the "community" and be paid the same as any other women's work. Now, would any women actually do this if they were paid the same? |
This is pretty much nonsense, just like the often used statement under communism all goods are common property, including women. Women are not goods.
Under ideal communism, due to the lack of a monetary equivalent and the rule "to each by his needs" there would be no reason for a woman to sell her body. For what, since ideally everyone can have every good. Yes, she would give sex only for free. However not to everyone who wants it, but to those she decides, i.e. is in love with.
quote: Also, let's assume that some women actually worked "on the side" and kept the money. Would this be prosecuted as an economic crime? |
What money?
quote: Under real communism, I assume that prostitutes were/are tolerated as most small businesses were/are tolerated. But the average prostitute would be able to make a lot more money than the average doctor as doctor's wages were/are controlled. |
Here you are right. I lived under real communism (even tho we called it socialism) and this is pretty much how it was.
quote: So why would a woman want to be a doctor and not a prostitute under real communism? |
Well... there is a thing like self-esteem even under communism, believe it or not. Not every woman would cross that line easily. Some would, the majority would not.
Under capitalism prostitutes also earn more money than a lot of other professions. So why would under capitalism a woman be a house cleaner, a simple secretary or even unemployed if she can make much more spreading her legs?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
What money?
|
Well things of value to her. Even without currency, people will have things that other people want and barter can occurr
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Whaleboy
And Ned's assuming it's all about economics. Would you rather be a labourer or a manager, assuming both are paid the same? |
Depends on type of labour. Actually if everything paid the same I would seek to change jobs frequently. Why bother building skills or expertise in a certain area. A factory or a logger job could be interesting for a while and then I would move on.
More generally, I probably would prefer to be the labourer unless the manager was free to go home after their shift regardless of how F***ed up things were.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:34
|
|
Any specials today comrade madame?
Hmm, doesn't roll off the toung...finger.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
BlackCat
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
Depends on type of labour. Actually if everything paid the same I would seek to change jobs frequently. Why bother building skills or expertise in a certain area. A factory or a logger job could be interesting for a while and then I would move on.
More generally, I probably would prefer to be the labourer unless the manager was free to go home after their shift regardless of how F***ed up things were. |
Sounds nice, this jobchanging at will, but since you doesn't have any influence in what you are going to do, because that is decided on a level above you, then you may end up putting dogfood in tincans without possibilty of change.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|