 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
I never fully understood why GM and Ford in particular continued to insist on churning out crap. Yes, they have very high costs of labor from likely bad union deals. But that's a reality. Is the better way to deal with that reality to start making the best quality cars in the world, or spew out endless reams of garbage?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Don't get me wrong. Their cars are now very reliable.
What happens is that the car companies -- GM in particular -- need to differentiate each of their products among all of their other very numerous products. They do this by closely regulating luxury. If you spend on the lower end, you get garbage and find it necessary to move up and spend more. If you spend in the mid-range, you get only slightly better garbage, and look longingly at the luxury models. If you spend on the higher end, you get luxury.
The Japanese carmakers put out fewer products and don't have to differentiate among them quite so much. Because of this, you get more luxury across the product lines. |
Yes, and which strategy seems to be working ever so slightly better? And what's the size of the market for luxury compared to that of low- and mid-range?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|