 |
|  |
 |
|
Frankychan
|
 |
In the Kingdom of Hawaii (CPA Member)
Sep 2001 time: 19:35
|
|
Dudes,
I gotta agree. Lemme tell you this,
I went in to a hospital about two months ago after a surfing incident where I punctured my foot. I took some x-rays. Anyway, I got the bill two days ago and the bill just from the x-rays was
$185.00
Luckily I have medical insurance (government employed), or else I would have been paying my ass off just for the x-rays alone...the hospital visit alone was a hell of a lot. Like the wiseman Ted kind of touched one, the cost of medical malpractice suits have seemingly risen the cost of medical care a lot, but holy f'ing crap. That is ridiculous. If I wasn't covered, I would be screwed...and I'm government insured. Now, how many people in the U.S. alone aren't even insured at all.......THEN we can figure out how much the unseen American taxpayer is being screwed over.
Anyway, watching CNN today I learned that for every U.S. congressman/woman (Representative as well as Senator)...there are 2 lobbyists. And that's where big business blurs with the government.
Pardon my bias, but please explain to me why America (as one of the richest nations on Earth) doesn't have free medical aid to it's citizens.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:35
|
|
So? There is not a country on this planet that makes living on minimum wage comfortable and nice. Even if you have 'free healthcare' you still pay for it in taxes and you pay up to some point of money per year anyway in hard cash to boot it up. If you make minimum wage, you are not meeting that one anyway. In the nation of people going on surgery for fat, diabetics, etc etc, free healthcare will be too costly for you guys, even when it's the richest country on earth. OR it can be done, but it can not cover everything, just the most common basic things. It will lead the healthcare into spiral of things, some negative, some good, but at the end, it'll be the same as now, or little better, or little worse.
right wing hates poor people, left wing doesn't know what can be done in the real world and that there are other scenarios than the flower scenario when you follow rhetorics.
You think getting x-rays is cheap? in here you are lucky to get an x-ray, why, because it costs. So if you have pain somewhere, better give you some pain killers instead. When doctors are there also to save money, you get ****ed up situation where no one gets treated anymore but thrown out on any excuse. That's seriously not taking care of everyone in need. That's when no one gets treated, rich or poor. So at the end, you end up paying for it the full amount ... even the lefties in here knows it, because it's not something I'm making up or urban legend, it's the 100% reality and truth.
Oh but you have the money for it, so it won't be a problem.... no you don't.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:35
|
|
quote: I gotta agree. Lemme tell you this,
I went in to a hospital about two months ago after a surfing incident where I punctured my foot. I took some x-rays. Anyway, I got the bill two days ago and the bill just from the x-rays was
$185.00
Luckily I have medical insurance (government employed), or else I would have been paying my ass off just for the x-rays alone...the hospital visit alone was a hell of a lot. Like the wiseman Ted kind of touched one, the cost of medical malpractice suits have seemingly risen the cost of medical care a lot, but holy f'ing crap. That is ridiculous. If I wasn't covered, I would be screwed...and I'm government insured. Now, how many people in the U.S. alone aren't even insured at all.......THEN we can figure out how much the unseen American taxpayer is being screwed over. |
I've had a similar experience. My sandals had lost their grooves due to overuse. So, one rainy day at school, I slipped on some stairs and fell several steps lower. And then I got up, and slipped again and landed right on my back another few steps lower.
So, I decide to go to my school's health clinic, and they do some x-rays (luckily nothing broken/cracked), and they charged me around $150... And apparantly my mom's insurance was too shitty to cover UT's halfassed services, and I had to pay the whole thing out of my pocket (and even though I work for one of the profs part time, I don't get any insurance coverage from the school). Loans. 
Last edited by Ramo on 16-06-2005 at 15:48
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: ex-military straight-arrow Christian from Nebraska |
When was Drake in the army?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:35
|
|
In terms of administrative costs, we spend $752 per capita more than Canada each year according to a recent study. So a single payer system would save around a couple hundred billion dollars in terms of administrative costs, which is far more than needed to insure everyone currently uninsured.
quote: The gap between US and Canadian spending on healthcare administration has grown to $752 per capita, according to the New England Journal of Medicine, reporting August 21 on the findings of researchers at Harvard Medical School and the Canadian Institute for Health Information.
"A decade ago, the administrative costs of healthcare in the United States greatly exceeded those in Canada. We investigated whether the ascendancy of computerization, managed care, and the adoption of more businesslike approaches to healthcare have decreased administrative costs," NEJM editors wrote. "A large sum might be saved in the United States if administrative costs could be trimmed by implementing a Canadian-style healthcare system," journal editors concluded.
Healthcare bureaucracy cost Americans $294.3 billion in 1999. The $1,059 per capita spent on healthcare administration was more than three times the $307 per capita in paperwork costs under Canada's national health insurance system. Cutting US health bureaucracy costs to the Canadian level would have saved $209 billion in 1999. |
http://abilitymagazine.com/news_CanadianHealthCare.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
The Wall Street Journal did an interesting article on malpractice caps, especially pain and suffering. At least in Texas, is your spouse is a stay-at-home mom and get's killed due to medical malpractice, as long as the doctor and hospital pay all the expenses you cannot show sufficient economic damage to get the vast majority of law firms to sue. The $250,000 cap means that the $100,000 expense to get the case to court - expert witnesses, depositions, discovery, etc. - eats up the profits to the point you cannot get lawyers to take the case on contigency fees. There's not enough money to recover. So mommies are now economically worthless, at least to the courts (modern weregeld). The Great, Christian state of Texas. 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|