 |
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:35
|
|
Some early thoughts:
Objective:- a 1-turn conquest of 4 PK bases in the Central Arcadian neck, followed by a swift acceptance of Lal's submissiion
- capture of the Alien Artifacts at UN Planning Authority and UN Commerce Committee
Invasion will take place in 2177, with the first assault wave (3 vessels) timed to arrive simultaneously
Force comprises:
- a 6~2-2 steppenwolf
- a 6~1-2 R-112 class
- a 6-1-2 Janissarie
- 2 x 6-1-1 missile infantrymen
- a 4-1-1 Impact Infantryman
- a 1-2t-2 Skanky's Sileni
- a 1-1-2 unity Rover
supported by:- a 0-1-2 Longstrider
- a 0-1-1 Crypteia
Air Force, staging out of Iaci Base
- 4 Missile penetrators (6-1-10)
- 3 Impact penetrators (4-1-10)
- 1 x F-6 Interceptor
Naval Forces committed- Coastguard Cutters (1)-2t-6 SCC Minas Tirith & SCC Iaci
- Frigate (1)-1-4 SCC Invincible
We're up against the following defenses:
UN Planning Authority (Perimeter Defense)- 3 green 1-3-1 Plasma sentinels
- 2 green 1-1-2 scout rovers
- 1 disciplined 1-1-2 scout rover at the monolith
UN Great Refuge- 1 disciplined and 2 green Plasma sentinels
UN Headquarters- 1 hardened 1-3-1 Plasma sentinel
UN Commerce Committee- a 1-1-2 Scout rover
- a 0-1-2 Longstrider
Last edited by Googlie on 17-06-2005 at 22:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Modo44
|
 |
in western Poland
Jul 2004 time: 06:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Googlie
Some questions:[list][*]Do we change again to Fundy next year, prior to the invasion? |
Do we need to? I mean how much would it help execute the invasion?
quote: Originally posted by Googlie
[*]do we upgrade any units beforehand (eg the unity rover, and impact infantryman, plus the 3 pens all to missile class?) |
I believe we ought to. After all, we are going after Yang next, so might as well get prepared. (And it is better to prevent losses rather than whine after they happen...)
quote: Originally posted by Googlie
[*]Do we kick off the invasion with a probesteal of Neural Grafting from UN High Commission |
Ahh, here is my answer to the fundy thing. Personally, I do not care. I think we can wait to get it for free anyway.
quote: Originally posted by Googlie
[*]do we use the navy to bombard first, to weaken any defenders (question - does arty bombardment destroy any facilities, the way a bombing run does?) |
I think we should, especially if we do not upgrade the attackers after all.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:35
|
|
Well, Lal does have a plethora of unity rovers (19, in fact) of which we can account for 4 in or around the 4 target bases, 3 in his other bases, and 1 beside our scout & spore launcher NE of Iaci Base. That leaves 11 on the loose and unaccounted for. Not a bad counter-attacking force.
On the plus side, he only has one Missile penetrator, currenly in the air, so we don't know where it is. hence our F-6 being part of the support forces, to take it out if we locate it.
If he doesn't surrender, I say we pause for breath and then just keep rolling over him
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:35
|
|
We could (in order)- probesteal Neural Grafting (but as we are strong and he is weak he might just "slap wrists")
- demand withdrawal (he didn't have forces roaming around last turn and when I just parallel-tested the demand, I got the "You must be aware, my vigilant friend, that I have no forces in your territory" reply)
- declare Vendetta
(I couldn't test the probesteal as that elite longstrider met a unity rover astride the road to UN High Commission)
Last edited by Googlie on 20-06-2005 at 19:40
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:35
|
|
Yes - it can (unfortunately it can attack, destroy the defender, but not occupy the base that same turn, as it lacks enough mp's)
Our elite Longstrider could mc the rover, then mc the base itself, as it will have enough mp's. Or as there are other PK troops milling around that area, could try for an untraceable mc of a couple of rovers this next (2176) turn, which will stand us in good stead for the 2177 invasion proper
Note: If we openly mind control, Lal declares vendetta but the Angels don't join in
If we declare vendetta, then the AI triggers the Angels pact with lal and they declare vendetta on us
So for 2176 we migh consider using our elite longstrider to untraceably mind-control 2 PK rovers, then next turn go for another unit, or the base, or Neural grafting and trigger a lal-induced vendetta
or else we just bite the bullet in 2177 and declare ourselves, and give the Angels 1 turn to restore treaty (and if they don't, why then we just build the AV for ourselves under the "all deals are off during vendetta" diplomatic stance
|
|
|  |
 |
|
vishniac
|
 |
Lausanne, Switzerland
Feb 2002 time: 06:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Googlie
(Would get us a cheap veteran upgradeable scout rover able to capture High Commission itself (only has a single scout rover there as a defender) |
OH, yes, YES!!!
Oh, Googlie, please, please, UN High Commission, please!
I need it for Churchillian sea-strategic endeavours...
Another thought: if we probesteal NG to try to get vendetta, why not do it as the "Frame another faction!"?
So, if it succeeds, PK will be at war with, say, Morgan and we are not the only one losing something.
If it fails, then we are in one-in-one vendetta with Lal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by vishniac
Another thought: if we probesteal NG to try to get vendetta, why not do it as the "Frame another faction!"?
So, if it succeeds, PK will be at war with, say, Morgan and we are not the only one losing something.
If it fails, then we are in one-in-one vendetta with Lal. |
This is so sneaky that I like it!! Very Crypteiaic
One point, though .... if we fail, then we'll be obliged under the probe rules to choose the vendetta option with Morgan (the game mistakenly goives the option to the guilty party (us) and not to the in jured party (Morgan) in this instance, and the rules say that we must always choose the vendetta option)
Do we really want to risk that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zeiter
|
|
Wow, after we spank Lal we're going to have this awesome invasion force just sitting there doing nothing. How could we keep these boys busy after the Lal invasion? Yang, perhaps?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
as i currently dont have a computer with smax on it (i know shame on me) can some one perhaps post a picture with or warplans drawn on it? |
Northern and western task Forces will reach the staging area next turn (2176)
Also next turn, Crypteia ops will subvert a couple of PK units using "untraceable capture"
2177: Air assault on Planning Authority to empty the base of defenders, then the R-112 amphrover lands and secures the base. task forces then dock, and fan out to take the remaining 3 bases
Simultaneously, the subverted units will converge on and take UN High Commission
The whole exercise should net us 5 PK bases in 1 turn (don't know if the AA survives an air attack - we might have to capture the base from the sea with a unbit still in it - need to simulate that preturn)
At some point during the exercise Lal will undoubtedly call and want to surrender - the question is, do we wait until we have all 5 bases, or acept it partway (maybe after we take Planning Authority and Commerce Committee, which has the AA's, and also High Commission, which gives us our port on that ocean
Operation PW
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|