 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Brent Spiner is gay? |
If he wags his finger like that, yes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
A similiar connection has already been made between human papilloma virus (HPV) transmission and circumcision. Considering that certain forms of HPV cause cervical cancer in women (90% of men show no symptoms) this is no surprise.
My only guess is that the organisms get in the folds of the foreskin, and the prolonged contact makes catching the organism easier. Cleaning the male genitalia after sex also reduces the chances of some STD's, and circumcision makes it substantially easier to clean - note I didn't say it is impossible to clean a foreskin, but if you've just had sex, and are feeling sleepy, it would probably be much easier not to bother. I have also heard interviews with men who have had adolescent/adult circumcision (to fit in to American culture many years ago when having a foreskin was considered weird) and they reported a substantial loss in sensation, in fact one was quite bitter about it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
Nope. Still not happy.
I would think that any man willing to submit to circumcision as part of an AIDS-related prevention measure, has already demonstrated such a level of awareness and caution that one must question whether they can be accurately compared with the norm.
Or, following usual "placebo" testing methods, were a control group left unaware of whether they had been cut or not? I doubt it. |
I doubt you can ever do a proper double blind test of cirumcision You also cant do that on say, talk therapy as a treatment for depression, or exercise, weight loss and heart disease. Thats the nature of lifestyle changes, as opposed to meds.
So youve got some scientific suggestions of why it might work, youve got the real world epidemilogical evidence (with its inherent statistical unreliability), and youve got an inevitably flawed study.
Well, as Maimonides said, no one should circumsize himself or his son except as a matter of faith
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
Nope. Still not happy.
I would think that any man willing to submit to circumcision as part of an AIDS-related prevention measure, has already demonstrated such a level of awareness and caution that one must question whether they can be accurately compared with the norm.
Or, following usual "placebo" testing methods, were a control group left unaware of whether they had been cut or not? I doubt it. |
I don't know about the current large scale study, but in the previous prospective trials done in Kenya they used a pool of truck drivers - one of the highest risk groups in Africa, and rabdomly selected them to be in the treatment group and the control group. They attempted to determine if the potential exposure of the two groups was equal, i.e., that they were equally active.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|