 |
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
AH - and this is just a guess - you have the possibility of prolonged physical contact in a warm, wet, moist environment - uncleaned foreskin after an erection. Plus, and I do not speak from personal experience so I am guessing - mechanically the foreskin is going to move back and forth over the erection (I'm trying to use words so I don't get auto-censored) during sex, and this is going to increased the chance of getting small areas of skin rubbed raw, especially where the foreskin connects. If that is the case, it would account for the vastly increased risk of AIDS.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Here's the interesting question. Since uncut pernises are more sensitive from all anecdotal evidence, is a man who is uncut more willing to use a condom; i.e. is the reduction in sensation such it feels as good to him as it is for a circumsized man. That is the second question that needs asked.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
YOU! Give me your dick, I'm going to cut off the foreskin!
YOU! You can keep your foreskin, but tell me when you get HIV. |
No, that's not quite how it works. The usual practice is for the researchers to be completely up front with the specimens...... I mean, participants. They explain to them the nature of the study and they let them know that they will be chosen by lots. If someone finds this objectionable then he's free to leave.
If the results of a study appear to be overwhelmingly positive researchers have the ethical option to "break the seal". i.e., tally the results short of the sexpected end date. At that point they may offer the treatment to the control group.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|