 |
|  |
 |
|
ArchdukeNewell
|
 |
California
Jul 2005 time: 21:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Today's Mali and several surroundings countries. OK, Mali and Burkina Faso are dirt poor, but they've been peaceful for decades, and they have very low AIDS rates for African standards.
I'd have thrown in Senegal as well, which is better off than Mali and Burkina, but part of that country is hazardous because of a rebellion. |
Yeah, that reassures me very much on Africa's greatness and cultural superiority to the rest of the world, as you seem to be claiming.
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Surprisingly, these three countries have been under the influence of the Ghana/Mali/Songhay empires, which lasted centuries, and not decades as you put it (If you didn't spout provocative ignorance, people might take your point more seriously). |
It's called hyperbole, not provocative ignorance. And in any case, they may have existed for centuries, but they were only a reasonable facsimile of a power for decades. Before they were destroyed by Morocco! That was my point.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ArchdukeNewell
Yeah, that reassures me very much on Africa's greatness and cultural superiority to the rest of the world, as you seem to be claiming. |
I never claimed such a thing.
I corrected you on your gross and false generalization. You seem to believe that all of Africa is a starving hellhole full of war, disease and despair. Reality is quite a bit more complex.
quote: It's called hyperbole, not provocative ignorance. And in any case, they may have existed for centuries, but they were only a reasonable facsimile of a power for decades. Before they were destroyed by Morocco! That was my point. |
Well, a few Spaniards destroyed the Aztecs and the Incas and you call them a worthy Civ. The Spaniards never managed the same feat against Morocco, but when the Moroccans destroy the Songhay, you claim that it proves the African inferiority.
I fail to see any logic in that.
If you treated the Aztecs and the Incas as pseudo-Civs not worthy of inclusion in the game, you'd have at least the benefit of being consistent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ArchdukeNewell
|
 |
California
Jul 2005 time: 21:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by General Ludd
It's an anti-civilization. It has commodities in place of culture, and there is nothing civilized about brute force.
|
Just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's not culture. The rest of the world disagrees with you. American culture pervades every culture of this earth.
What are we talking on at this instant? The Internet, an America wonder.
The Manhattan Project, the Apollo Program, the United Nations! Sound familiar?
quote: Originally posted by General Ludd
For the entirety of history up untill a few hundred years ago.
|
Okay. Give some specifics. Show us a time when they were on par with Classical Rome, or Tang Dynasty China or post-Napoleonic Europe. Can't do that? I could go on but it would embarrass you.
Were there times when Africa wasn't as pathatic as they are now? Probably. But there was never a time when they were a scientific, military, cultural, religious, economic, social, diplomatic anything powerhouse.
You point to one corner of a vast continent for a small time period and use it for an excuse as to why Africa is as good as the rest of the world. Not going to cut it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ArchdukeNewell
|
 |
California
Jul 2005 time: 21:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
I never claimed such a thing.
I corrected you on your gross and false generalization. You seem to believe that all of Africa is a starving hellhole full of war, disease and despair. Reality is quite a bit more complex. |
How so? Give me real proof that any part of Africa isn't either disease-ridden, war-torn, impoverished, currently committing genocide on its own people or neighbors or has some other horrific problem.
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Well, a few Spaniards destroyed the Aztecs and the Incas and you call them a worthy Civ. The Spaniards never managed the same feat against Morocco, but when the Moroccans destroy the Songhay, you claim that it proves the African inferiority. I fail to see any logic in that. If you treated the Aztecs and the Incas as pseudo-Civs not worthy of inclusion in the game, you'd have at least the benefit of being consistent. |
The Spanish destroyed a decadent and declining Aztec empire, who, if you want to include predecessors, had been dominating their continent for hundreds and hundreds of years. Or would you call the Pyramid of the Sun inferior to an Ivory Mask? The Pyramid of the Sun is larger in volume than the Great Pyramid at Giza.
The Visigoths destroyed Rome, does that mean Rome shouldn't be included? The point is, they were past their prime. Mali was destroyed at the height of its power, which as far as I can determine, included trading in gold and being a Muslim puppet in west Africa.
In any case, why are we having this discussion when my point about the Ottomans still hasn't been addressed!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:18
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ArchdukeNewell
How so? Give me real proof that any part of Africa isn't either disease-ridden, war-torn, impoverished, currently committing genocide on its own people or neighbors or has some other horrific problem. |
Look for example at Dakar. Sure it's poor, and it has the problem linked to big and poor cities, but it's nothing near genocide-worthy "horrible". Unless you consider the caribbean countries, and most of south American metropolises to be "horrible" as well.
You'll get a similar picture in most African capitals, except for the southern part of Africa (AIDS ridden), and the countries experiencing a civil war.
quote: The Spanish destroyed a decadent and declining Aztec empire, who, if you want to include predecessors, had been dominating their continent for hundreds and hundreds of years. Or would you call the Pyramid of the Sun inferior to an Ivory Mask? The Pyramid of the Sun is larger in volume than the Great Pyramid at Giza.
Mali was destroyed at the height of its power, which as far as I can determine, included trading in gold and being a Muslim puppet in west Africa. |
What makes you sure that Songhay was destroed at the height of its power? Please explain me.
quote: In any case, why are we having this discussion when my point about the Ottomans still hasn't been addressed! |
1. This thread is about Mali, not about the pet peeves of individual posters (a much stronger case could be made about the Babylonians, and I'm surprised that no Babs-supporter came in already)
2. If you weren't so adamantly bigoted towards Mali, maybe your other points wouldn't fall under the radar. As it is, your position about the Mali is too big a blip on the radar, and your other positions are made invisible by it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:18
|
|
quote: We already have plenty of civs like that. The point is not that Mali had no military, rather that they lost! |
I wasn't aware that Rome still existed as a country. Could it be because they... oh, I dunno... lost? 
quote: Didn't you just say you DIDN'T like to see militaristic civs? Then why are you so adamant that the rape/loot/plunder Spanish civ should go in? Probably because I said they shouldn't. |

Because they had an influence on the world! When did I say I didn't like miltaristic Civs? Are you trying to put words in my mouth because you can't defend your arguments?
I said it would nice to have a builder civ and not ALL the civs be militaristic.
[qThe Incas put gold on their world market, trading with civilizations all over the Pre-Columbian world. I don't doubt that Mali had gold or traded, only that I don't think it made as much difference as you are trying to say that it did.[/q]
'Their' world market. It was no where near as sophisticated as the world market in EurAsia/Africa. The "New World" didn't share the same value of gold. Therefore they didn't have as much influence. OTOH, Europe, Asia, Africa valued gold and Mali at one point held half of the world's gold out on the market. That made it a center of trade.
quote: And here I was thinking that a bias was some personal and unreasoned judgment and prejudice, and I thought prejudice was pre-judging. |
Yep, it is. And you are guilty of it . Just because you can make an argument out of it after you've judged doesn't make you any less biased.
quote: The meaning of PC has been watered down. What it currently means is trying to include everybody to make them happy. In case you hadn't noticed, every previous Civ game HAS had at least one sub-Saharan African civ. Why? To be PC! |

Diversity ISN'T PC! Jeez, Louise! PC is and has always been saying or doing things not to offend people. Only people with no concept of PC, or who wish to use it to shout people down (like people used "COMMUNIST" in the 50s) define it as promoting diversity. This leads to idiotic assertions like Affirmative Action is merely PC.
quote: I only wrote about 6 civs because I was TRYING to be brief. If you really want me to write out why ALL 18 civs are diverse, then I will be pleased to humor you. For now, in the interests of brevity, I hope this suffices.
America - current global hegemon, Sid is American
Arabs - Islam, great military and cultural strength
Aztecs - token Mesoamerican Civ, big pyramids (better than Mali), large empire
Babylon - birthplace of civilization, science, religion, etc.
China - longest semi-continuous world civ
Egypt - Pyramids, very long-lived civ, culture
England - former hegemon, dominated the globe, English language, sun never set on it
France - cultural hegemon, Napoleon, Escargot
Germany - almost took over the world twice
Greece - influenced all of western culture, democracy, Alexander
India - great longevity, Hinduism, great culture
Japan - another almost took over the world civ., Shinto
Mali - token Sub-Saharan African civ
Mongolia - largest world empire
Persia - influenced proto-Judeo-Christian culture, big empire
Rome - influence still felt today, technology, culture, etc.
Russia - really big, massive continent spanning
Spain - kinda iffy but they needed an 18th civ |
Yeah, no bias there! You dig yourself a bigger and bigger hole.
And Spain is kinda iffy?! They deserve to be in over Germany and Japan at least.
As for 'distinct' civs. America and Britain have a similar culture. As do Greece & Rome. Babylon & Arabs are basically the same peoples just in different periods of history. China, Japan & Mongolia have a similar culture. (Note, 'similar' doesn't mean the same.. before people yell and scream)
Sorry, Mali shows it belongs.
quote: How about the Reformation? That changed the entire history of the world. Far reaching consequences. |
Yes, and the German state built that? I thought that was more about a German (Luther) and a Swiss (Calvin), and resulted in half of Germany fighting the other half.
I mean WW2 changed the history of the world, but Japan isn't in the game because of that (at least I hope not! )!
----
quote: Yes, justify insulting people based exclusively on your own opinon. That makes you a competent debater. "You're stupid because I say so!" Get some real evidence and come back. |
When your statements show you are biased... when the shoe fits..
quote: "Enhance experience" to one person = "politically correct garbage" to another. |
Yes, and you've amply demonstrated your lack of ability to bend your mind around what terms actually mean.
See, I can be just as dismissive and pithy. It ain't no big skill.
----
quote: As an aside, if you didn't spout provocative ignorance |

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
sophist
|
|
I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, but yeah, monster truck rallies are culture. Culture is the set of common entertainment, language (idioms especially), dress, traditional, and religious practices, among other things. If you think American culture is mediocre and lame, well, I won't argue with you. I will, however, argue that so are the cultures of other countries. For example, read the script of an opera translated into your native language. It's such ridiculous soap opera. And yet, we regard it as high art. It is a historical constant that the culture of the day will be condemned as worthless. It is a historical constant that the culture of other nations will be condemned as worthless. And yet, here we are.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:18
|
|
I'm glad people see it my way. 
And yes, it is not good culture. I'm trying to think of good examples of U.S. culture, I'm having a little trouble .
There is the fast food culture. That isn't good of course. But that might be more of a lifestyle instead of culture.
going to the movies, isn't that an american culture? Sure other nations do it, but weren't we the first?
biker culture. I know England has somewhat of a biker culture, but it isn't that similar to the one in the U.S. This might not be a good example, but that's only because I don't like motorcycles. Many people do.
Hot Rod culture.
football (american) and other sports such as baseball which are very american centric. and of course wrestling, monster truck rallies, car racing (though forumula cars are popular in Europe), mud wrestling, mechanical bulls, the whole cowboy thing for that matter, rodeos. the list goes on and on.
keggers and funnels (I don't know what they call it when you down beer with funnels). Not a very safe practice, but it's a party culture. Sure the English and Irish drink a lot, but they drink differently than U.S. college kids.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Autotropx Sox
|
|
quote: And yes, it is not good culture. I'm trying to think of good examples of U.S. culture, I'm having a little trouble |
American Grand Stand
Baseball
American Literature (distinctly different from Old World in every way)
Pop-media (nearly any type of modern musical styles originated in the United States)
Americanized English
Modern motion films
The list can go on and on with good examples of how American culture has differentiated itself and developed into a diverse mix of other races, cultures, and ideals which form a rich tapestry of our "American" culture.
And Dis..
I take offense at the examples of America's culture you so lovelingly placed on your brief and biased list. If you had actually tried to find out about American culture other then what you see on your news channels and on internet sites such as Newgrounds and Liquidgeneration then you would realize that our country isn't some shallow demigogue of uncouth and stupid youth.
quote: It is a historical constant that the culture of the day will be condemned as worthless. It is a historical constant that the culture of other nations will be condemned as worthless. And yet, here we are. |
Then why do you take such offense at the fact that other people consider Mali's culture and people too unwrothwhile to be included into Civ IV?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:18
|
|
As a red-blooded American who just bought a Harley Davidson motorcycle, here's my view:
We have some *very* hard decades ahead of us as we learn to be #2 (then #3, #4?) in the world. We are already losing jobs and some of our leads in various industries are dropping rapidly. In other words, our Golden Age in some respects is declining.
However, if we learn to join forces with the world and adapt to realities, we can maintain an incredibly important position. But it will have to come with some hard lessons of humility and heaping doses of more respect and understanding for other countries and cultures. I do believe, though, that day will come...if slowly. Indeed, it's what I work on every day in my job and is the reason I lived in another country for 6 years learning a foreign language (Korean). I start Chinese language in the fall, also.
At the same point, the American resolve for fighting the good fight (at least when it's against a clear enemy and not something much harder to understand like terrorism) is and has been a wonder. I am speaking, of course, of WW2 -- to which we came very late and very unprepared, I understand.
But since WW2 (Korean War, Vietnam, now Iraq) as our understanding of the enemy has gotten worse and worse, so has our response, sadly. Thus, to the degree that we learn more about the world and our proper place it in, I think the American civilization will yet again prove one of the greatest ever.
This is especially so as long as some of the world's greatest minds continue to seek a life here enriching us financially and culturally.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:18
|
|
quote: Who is going to beat out the US as the lead power? |
For the short-term, it will be collectives like the EU. Surely all of Europe can surpass the United States in whatever it wants, if it can work through its own huge problems. Later, it *will* be China. Money buys most anything, including Super Power status.
And I think your question is revealing: I don't think we're heading for a "lead power" situation so much as a situation where countries that learn to build synergy and share common success and respect will prosper together. Those that maintain extreme positions of being "right" and resort to wars and car bombs will be marginalized.
Again, I think the U.S. will respond to this trend slowly but surely, though some awfully hard years of American re-thinking (learning foreign languages, being more aware of other cultures' values, etc.) is simply going to have to take place. Oh, and we'll have to actually encourage foreigners to continue studying in our country instead of treating them like criminals. Already other markets for study abroad besides the U.S. are filling this void (Canada, U.K., Australia), and in the process we our losing the best advertisement for loving this country that we have ever had or ever will have.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|