 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:18
|
|
The man-O-war being out bof date so quickly is sad. The age of sail lasted hundreds of years, but by the time you have frigates built they're practicly obsolete. Civ III just skipped right over the line of battle ships that the english built one of the world's greatest empires with.
With the inseption of the discovery of sail turns should encompass less years to highlight an interesting time in history.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
H Tower
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alexander01
Thanks.
Oh, and I hope the Age of Enlightenment lasts a little bit longer so that the Man-of-War, Conquistador, etc. have more prolonged usefulness. |
Defined ages are out, so maybe they'll be more useful, or possibly less
|
|
|  |
 |
|
H Tower
|
|
not having played the game, I have no idea.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lebensraum
|
|
well since we've established that mali had no worthwhile military. how about a unique city improvement?
i propose: the malinese mud hut
special ability: makes pc left-wing liberals melt in the rain
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
binTravkin
|
 |
Lord of Progress of the Council of Lords of Gaia
Jan 2004 time: 07:18
|
|
quote: Indians: Not War Elephants, I don't think. Any ideas? |
How bout a "Sikh Warrior"?
(the sikh were elite warriors in Deli sultanate and later Mughal Empire IIRC and they're well known thru history for their high skills and usage of weird weapons. "Chakra" is one example - the ring with gilette-sharp outer rim.)
quote: Russians: Cossack? MiG? Strelets? Boyar? |
Boyar is not a warrior, but a name of social group. Kinda "knight" in medieval Europe.
Strelets's were only a mass of cannonfodder.
MiG was good indeed, but not so good to be on level with F15, also there's a tendency to not have "special" units of exactly the same kind for 2 nations.
T-34 would qualify almost as good as German Panzer, but as Panzer is more recongisable, I think we can forget about it.
Cossacks are a good thought, but they didn't achieve so much than most of the other unique units.
Remember that USSR's mobile nuke platform?
I've never seen U.S. had something similar and even if it did, it did not have so many ways of application.
In the Kuwait War at 1991 iraqis used them IIRC (or at least tried) for SCUD missile launching (not nuclear though).
Also, returning to the topic of aircraft, there were several good models by USSR in WW2, like IL-2 (recognisable for it's wast anti-tank ability and simple-and-easy-to-maintain design.).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
akulla
|
|
Washington, DC
Nov 2002 time: 05:18
|
|
Sweet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
sophist
|
|
"Sikh Warrior" isn't really sensible as a unit, as there weren't specific units of Sikhs trained in some Sikh-specific fashion. The Sikhs have a long and distinguished martial history, but that's not the same thing.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|