 |
|  |
 |
|
JohnT

|
 |
Capitalist
Mar 1999 time: 00:37
|
|
You're wrong.
See, the moral crisis in the movie is not whether Cruise's son lives, but the fact that Cruise is now a murderer, a decision he made coldly, cooly, and rationally. A lesser director would've taken the simple route, made it easier for the audience to say "oh, that poor man", but Spielberg didn't go down that road. The issue isn't whether Robbie lives, but whether Cruise is morally tainted by the end of the film.
Today's audiences, frankly, are not sophisticated enough to grasp this - they're looking to have everything spelled out for them, which is why this movie causes so much frustration.
Also, not that it matters, but in the original book the protagonist, his wife, and his son are all split up because of the invasion, but all make it back together in the end. So blame HG Wells for the "crappy ending" (others' words, not mine or yours), not Spielberg.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|