 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Caligastia
Racial purity is a myth everywhere as far as I'm concerned. As far as we can look back it's all a big mix. |
Then why would you believe that one race is more intelligent than another? there are huns, ostrogoths and what have you in europe all mixed up. why would they (characterised as simple barbarians at the time) have higher intelligence than a "race" from africa?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Aryans are only from the east. the others are fake.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Bereta_Eder
Then why would you believe that one race is more intelligent than another? there are huns, ostrogoths and what have you in europe all mixed up. why would they (characterised as simple barbarians at the time) have higher intelligence than a "race" from africa? |
I think the chances that any two large groups of people have the same average intelligence are miniscule. Why should it be any different for racial groups?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Caligastia
I think the chances that any two large groups of people have the same average intelligence are miniscule. Why should it be any different for racial groups? |
Statistics isn't your strong point, is it?
But of course you extend this already flawed hypothesis by stating that not only would they not be the same, but that you can automatically tell which one is less intelligent just by looking at the color of their skin.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
We're the least bastards, ostrogothohun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Pekka, you're right, they were a cult. |
So is multiculturalism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Bereta_Eder
racial purity is a myth. at least in europe. |
That's as false as can be:
http://www.abc.net.au/cgi-bin/commo...ath/default.htm
"In 1996, researchers from the National Institutes of Health in Washington D.C. led by Dr Stephen J O'Brien, tracked down the modern day descendents of Eyam from parish records and tested their DNA. They were curious to know whether the survivors shared any genetic similarity that had helped their ancestors resist the plague. They found high levels of a gene mutation called CCR5-delta 32 amongst the descendents. CCR5 is a gene that codes for a protein on the surface of white blood cells which acts as a receptor for other molecules involved in inflammation"
http://www.answers.com/topic/england
"Recent studies on the genetics of the English peoples (excluding recent arrivals in the 20th century) show that most are decended from palaeolithic inhabitants of England and there has been very little genetic contribution from Celtic or Anglo-Saxon migrations.However some of these results have been contridictory since they depend on partly on how one chooses the location from which the original Celtics or Anglo-Saxons came from."
http://virtual.finland.fi/finfo/english/where_do.html
" If we examine the genetic links between th peoples of Europe, the Sámis form separate group unto themselves, and othe Uralic peoples, too, have a distinctive geneti profile"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kontiki
Statistics isn't your strong point, is it?
But of course you extend this already flawed hypothesis by stating that not only would they not be the same, but that you can automatically tell which one is less intelligent just by looking at the color of their skin. |
These gentleman would beg to disagree with you, as usual.......
http://www.economist.com/science/di...tory_id=4032638
"The high intelligence of Ashkenazi Jews may be a result of their persecuted past"
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/03/s...serland&emc=rss
"Researchers Say Intelligence and Diseases May Be Linked in Ashkenazic Genes"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
At least in south Europe. | Hell, Species purity is a myth in the Balkan peninsula. [/QUOTE]
That's because it has been an invasion route for two millennia. It has been the crossroads of two divergent civilizations.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
one more troll makes it to my ignore file. plonk!!! |
Whatever little minded one- you cannot refute anything I post with actual facts, so now you do what all religious zealots do- stick your head in the sand and prey that the bogey man goes away.
The era is known by educated people as the age of the dictator. And FDR is not released from that- all you have to do is look at the powers he assumed after packing the Court.
You should call yourself "Lord of the Brain Fart" or "Lord of Missed the Mark"- much more fitting.
Last edited by Epublius Rex on 11-08-2005 at 00:24
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
one more troll makes it to my ignore file. plonk!!! |
Stalin killed three times as many people as Hitler. FDR had no qualms about putting people in camps without evidence of misbehavior (though I do agree with him on the principle) and Churchill himself was no innocent.
There were many boogey men in the 20th century, take your pick, or put your head in the sand.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
So sad, all of this empty headed assertions on what is and what isn't- you all just try to fit everything into your little world of multiculti religious faith, no matter how absurd.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Pekka
No one has claimed they weren't more bad guys than Hitler and nazis. I think almost everyone conciders it a case of everyone was bad and it was a question who was more bad.
And it's not the idea of this thread anyway, but the cult side to nazis. |
Which I agree with- but the Nazis were not alone in that regard- far from it. Almost every totalitarian regime falls back on it at some point. I cannot think of any , off hand, that did not. Whether they invent it out of whole cloth or borrow from the ancient history of the people they wish to subject makes no real difference, to me- it is all cultism of leader worship.
Hitler's people, especially Goebbles, had a very good feel for what the German people would buy into. The propaganda they used in the Scandinavian countries for recruiting SS was centered around the Vikings, rather then the Teutonic knights as in Germany. Still, it was all propaganda, or as I prefer to call it, "statist dogma".
You may be able to find a book in your local library titled "The propaganda of WW2"- it goes into pretty good detail about the various mythologies employed by the different nations. Also, read "The rise and fall of the third reich" to really get a good idea of Nazi cultism.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Epublius Rex
|
|
All that being said, there was a deliberate darkness associated with the actual SS and the party itself- that darkness was meant to speak to a particular type of person, and still does, I think. There is a great deal of profound interest in the artifacts of Nazi Germany which goes beyond mere historical curiosity. Just consider the sexual perversion associated with it- the S&M rituals which employ a lot of the visuals of the uniforms, boots, etc.
Beyond that, there is the "old brown shirt syndrome" that draws many more people then most would care to admit- half of the cops in America fall under that.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|