 |
|
Nap Bonaparte
|
|
Newport Beach, California
May 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Crusty...I like the concept. I would like to do something like that as a multi-week weeknight game that always meets on the same nights.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nap Bonaparte
|
|
Newport Beach, California
May 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Tues and Wed eves are perfect . There is an EDT guy, Drake, who is also interested in a weeknight game. Lets get 2-3 more players who are interested in an ongoing Tues/Wed evening game and launch this thing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
suas333
|
|
Brooklyn, NY, U.S
Feb 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
would all treaties and alliances be allowed. Would it be similar to a diplogame? When you say like duels, so you mean all war?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
arii
|
|
St-Louis MO USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
I'm interested in such a game if we can find some compatible free time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
arii
|
|
St-Louis MO USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
It would be neat if each player had for objective to eliminate 1 player. Whoever realize his objective wins the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
This is a game setting I'd love to try out!
Preferably Deity level (of course!)
But I don't like arri's idea - too limted and someone could get lucky early just by position...
------------------
*THE DEITY*
#8388924
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nap Bonaparte
|
|
Newport Beach, California
May 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Deity......dont sweat it.....we could use one of Cavebears maps where everyone had their own continent..everyone could get a good "EQUAL" start.....then you are on your own....we are looking at Tues/Wed nights 6pm PDT - 10 pm PDT for an ongoing multiweek game......who is in?????
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nap Bonaparte
|
|
Newport Beach, California
May 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Crusty.....I am leaving on vacation in a couple of days and will be gone for a week and a half. Maybe we can get this game organized now and then launch it on Wed. Nov. 1st. It sounds like a very promising concept.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
brocher
|
|
L.A CA U.S.A.
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
i can make it tues &wed at the proposed times, sounds like an interesting game style. and by the way how do post those smiley face icons on your posts
|
|
|  |
 |
|
|
Crusty & Co
I have to work tomorrow (Weds here in Aussie) so I can't play USA Tues night for The Challenge game. I could play USA Weds night (Thurs here) but finbar is in another scheduled game with the Apolyton elite, I think....
so, maybe we could have our first session of this new game on your Weds night....
------------------
*THE DEITY*
#8388924
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Crustacian
|
 |
of Idaho PST
Jul 1999 time: 21:12
|
|
<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by drake on 10-17-2000 09:23 AM</font>
This just basically means that all players reveal their starting assets, so that there is an even start to the game??
<img src=/forums/"/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>
drake, we could do this if all agreed, but it was not what I was trying to suggest. I was just using a parralel principle that others already use comonly in games to support, in view of all the versions of the game out there, the need to have a game where all are fairly evenly matched with no extra edges other than their game skills and experience.
So just like many will openly say if they start with host tech advantage in case all want to restart until there is none, it would be nice if the players in this game agreed to have just the standard game version "stock" so to speak from the company. And that we would refrain from letting lag related bug advantages aid us and so forth.
One game it seemed like when i lost a city I would get gold ADDED to my treasury. A couple times when gold was gifted to me I recieved a good deal larger amounts than gifted. Tho I do not understand how to consistantly achieve these things, still if in this game stuff like that happens it would defeat the purpose of the game, and for example if it happened to me I would mention it so we could all decide how to handle it.
I have nothing against those who use free versions of the game bootlegged, but I am unsure if these are in part responcible for some of the bugs. Maybe it really makes no differance, but a stock version just seemed to be a common denominator to work from.
And if someone gained through a bug an edge just say so and we can decide how to even it out.
So Deity does nov 1st US wed eve sound good to you for a starting date with tuesday eves also possible?
Anyone who wants to not wait should feel free to start one long as there is someone left to play nappy and me If it was three of us that would be a game in itself.
Do all agree that 6 or 7 players might be too much to co ordinate? Other posts in the past suggest it can be hard to keep going.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Crustacian
|
 |
of Idaho PST
Jul 1999 time: 21:12
|
|
lets vote on settings to see where interest lies.
differing interests in this area is ok cuz several games can be set up to accomodate variety.
King King for me.
Emporer
Deity
1x1 for me FIRM
Large world medium to small land no huge continents.
A premade map with equal starting locations or home continents even if it is geometrical is fine with me. But flexible.
No Ai's FIRM
Apollo wonder only
No huts <---I seem to remember this being possible
Diplomats and spys can only make embassies, gather visual intelligence, sabotage units, not city improvements. No stealing, no bribing.
These are what I would like, but can be flexable.
Suas333:
A pluel is not necissarily a bloodlust style of playing. It can be a space race with war or without, science race only (no war, no SS), or a maximum pop by a certain date, or conquer the world, or win by powergraph...whatever.
But it is done as individuals rather than with alliances. With actual exploration and intelligence, rather than trading maps, techs, and tip offs.
There is nothing like a good ol regular game of Civ with wonders, stealing...you name it...
But this is for a little something differant, and still using standard game version...NO MODS.
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Crustacian (edited October 18, 2000).]</font>
|
|
|  |
 |
|
arii
|
|
St-Louis MO USA
Jan 1970 time: 05:12
|
|
I have a couple premade maps that can be used. They give each player a similar starting location, land mass, hutts, special ressources, access to other civs.
Regarding the dips: no tech stealing is ok with me. What about sabotage?
I guess you can still pick up a tech by conquering a city.
I like the idea of setting a goal that would allow to declare a winner in a shorter period of time (other than complete conquest and landing in AC whitch takes forever in large MP games).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Nap Bonaparte
|
|
Newport Beach, California
May 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Crusty...settings sound fine to me. If no happy wonders are allowed,we should probably play at king level.Allowing Manhattan Project would make it more historical/realistic. If you decide on a premade/known map, please e-mail me a copy to racndoc@home.com. Leaving town Friday for Maui......see you at 6pm on Nov. 1st.
Aloha
Nappy
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spider
|
|
k-town
Jul 2000 time: 05:12
|
|
Hey, guys,
I like the idea of using "equal" start maps. If you use something similar to one of Cavebear's maps, I'd love to play.
I played on one of Cavebear's maps one time where the whole map was revealed from the start. That might be something to consider as well.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12. Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|