 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:33
|
|
So reducing their capacity to deal with it and then having to spend billions in federal money to build it up again makes sense? Also, correct me if i am wrong, isn't La. one of the poorer states in the US? Maybe they don't have the money.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
JimmyCracksCorn
|
|
Macedonia - Sovereign country north of Greece.
Dec 2002 time: 05:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by orange
New Orleans is sinking man and I don't wanna swim |
Don't ever sing that song again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:33
|
|
I don't know, I see a country as unit stronger through its parts. So New Orleans and Louisana might not be the richest areas of the country, but the oil refining facilities and the port f.ex. add significantly to the US overall wealth, so it's in the federal governments interest to protect these bits and the workers that work on them, as well as the communities around them. But then the whole federal thing is not necesarrily something i am used to. I am guessing though most of the oil money is not going to Louisana but rather to Exxon or Texaco or whoever else is pumping in the Gulf.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:33
|
|
All of those things might be true, but that doesn't really answer to whether it is wise to situate a city where New Orleans is situated. If as a net proposition they deem it wise, then the good citizens of New Orleans should find it necessary to spend the money to make sure that the city doesn't sink into the sea.
I am rather more disinterested in the proposition as a personal matter you see. The good people of New Orleans (my family included) should be able to make the proper decisions without my permission.
Last edited by DanS on 30-08-2005 at 02:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:33
|
|
Why would I want to move New Orleans? Why would I even have a say in the matter through the federal government? I'm not a citizen of New Orleans and the surrounding area.
I was watching Senator Landreau beg for federal money on TV yesterday and thought it ridiculous that she be brought to the rather bizarre situation of begging me for my consent for her to do the right thing as she saw it.
Last edited by DanS on 30-08-2005 at 02:58
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:33
|
|
Because the country as a whole would suffer if the people of New Orleans decided to sack it in and move to Omaha or something? As i said i am unfamiliar of the whole federal thing (from personal experience anyway), but in most countries here the rich parts support the poor parts, especially if the poor parts provide essential roles in the smooth functioning of the national economy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
Camile didn't hit New Orleans, so once again, you are wrong. Katrina, at it's peak, was the 4th strongest recorded Atlantic storm in history. |
By "this area" I meant the Gulf Coast of Louisiana and Mississippi, the area that took the brunt of this storm. Camille hit the same area in '69 and was definitely stronger.
Last edited by Drake Tungsten on 30-08-2005 at 04:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|