 |
|  |
 |
|
OzzyKP
|
 |
Rockville, MD
Oct 1999 time: 00:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
quote: Originally posted by OzzyKP
The less power they have the less they can **** things up. |
That's like saying when you're out in the ocean, it's better to be in the water than in a boat, because an idiot captain could sink the boat. It's better to have some government protection than none. It's better to have lots of government prtection than some. The whole point of society, civilization, and government is to offer protection to members of the group. Those at the top may get more protection than those on the bottom, and they may be able to screw those at the bottom, but at the end of the day, the purpose of society is to look out for its members. We evolved that way. It is in our genetic code. |
Well then you no doubt expanding the government protection offered in the Patriot Act? Actually, the patriot act only offers some government protection, better yet would be lots of government protection. Lets pass a supped up patriot act on steroids. Its the purpose of society to look out for its members and protect them, so surely you'd support the most expansive patriot act possible?
Oh wait, you're concerned about privacy? About freedom? Well that's the whole fricken point here. "Government protection" often will trample on liberty, privacy, and civil rights. That's why "government protection" is often a euphamism for oppression.
Why do you support "government protection" in some areas and (i'm guessing) don't support "government protection" with policies such as the Patriot Act? The arguments are exactly the same.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:37
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
quote: Originally posted by OzzyKP
The less power they have the less they can **** things up. |
That's like saying when you're out in the ocean, it's better to be in the water than in a boat, because an idiot captain could sink the boat. It's better to have some government protection than none. It's better to have lots of government prtection than some. The whole point of society, civilization, and government is to offer protection to members of the group. Those at the top may get more protection than those on the bottom, and they may be able to screw those at the bottom, but at the end of the day, the purpose of society is to look out for its members. We evolved that way. It is in our genetic code.
Libertarianism and conservatism are anti-social philosphies, which means, at their core, they are anti-human. This is the philosophy which allowed the necessary work in NO to not be done. This is the philosophy that decided a privately run evacuation plan was the only way to go. Busses and trucks could have been stationed all around the city in order to get people out. Hell, even when you look at evac pictures, they still have the lanes to the city open, instead of using both sides of the highway to get people out. Conservatism took what should have been an economic disaster, and made it a disaster of human life.
I'm not pointing the finger at any one party, because both parties are cupable. Democrats are conservatives too in the South, and always have been. And the Nothern party hasn't had the balls to stand up for the poor. This is the fault of how we think about government, because of an anti-social ideology best typified by the Reagan quote. |
Holy ****. You've totally lost it.
Big government is in our genetic code?
People who disagree with you are anti-human? Don't you think you're claiming a bit more ground than you have earned there, Che?
It is the fault of how 'you' look at government, but you blame Reagan?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37. Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|