 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Velociryx
I liked your first answer better.
Big storm.
Big waves.
New Orleans = at or below sea level to begin with and built on the Bayou.
Result = Big Big Bad.
(and throwing more money at it would not, I don't believe, have made much difference)

-=Vel=- |
As I've pointed out in another thread:
FEMA has been predicting this -- big storm + infrastructure failure -- since at least 2001 (that is, for the whole of the Bush administration).
Every year since then, the Administration has given the agencies responsible for flood control in NO (Army Corps of Engineers and others) far less money than they have asked for (on average, 44% less) to deal with the problem.
In 2004, in particular, the Army Corps of Engineers asked for funding to deal with the reinforcement of the Lake Ponchatrain levees; the administration gave them a mere 20% of what they asked for.
Meanwhile, the Administration continues to crow about cutting taxes, and has no trouble borrowing money to finance its Iraq quagmire.
So, yeah, throwing money at the problem might not have fixed it -- but don't you wish we had at least tried?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Velociryx
|
 |
of Candle'Bre
Apr 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
Lossa people will prolly disagree with me here, but you asked my opinion, so I'll give it.
As I see it, it's like this:
At the present time, and given technologies available today, the following things are true:
* We cannot, for all our cleverness, make an entire city safe enough to protect it from a massive earthquake. Buildings on springs, all the latest doo dads combined...it's still not enough. Pipes will break, lines will rupture, roads and bridges will collapse, AND some of our spiffy buildings on springs will still fall (or could). There's no building technology on the planet that I'm aware of that can stand up to a max-the-Richter-scale-out quake. Not even Bucky Fuller's Geodesic Domes can do that on account of the foundation likely being damaged.
* Likewise, when you've got a city as big as New Orleans, *at or below sea level*, sitting on what amounts to a gigantic swamp....there's nothing our current technology can do. Sure, we could *maybe* have strengthened the levys to withstand a cat 4 storm, but a cat 5? Unlikely.
And when you're at or below sea level, you're at or below sea level. When that 30 foot swell hits, you're toast, and all the bells and whistles our technology has to offer won't amount to much in terms of stopping it.
Short of draining the bayou, tearing down new orleans, dumping a few gazillion gazillion tons of topsoil down and rebuilding the city on a hill, I'm not sure we coulda made it better.
-=Vel=-
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: Result = Big Big Bad.
(and throwing more money at it would not, I don't believe, have made much difference) |
Throwing money at problems always helps. With enough money they probably could've just got it all in pennies and used the huge mountains of pennies to reinforce the levees.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
I agree that a lot of the destruction in New Orleans is man made. I just hope we learn from this diaster.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
There is no way in the world that FEMA is going to be privatized. I think that diasters like this bring out the best in people most of the time any ways.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|