 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Darkstar
|
 |
Huntsville, AL, USA
May 1999 time: 23:16
|
|
Haven't we been educated for years and years (especially by Firaxis PR) that it is the publisher, not the developer that determines ship date? And that they have no protections or control? That they cannot slide back dates because it cost the publisher too much in ads and such, but the publisher can move the date to better suit their financial needs? Why, I do believe so.
Now, if the date is just being moved up a few weeks, that isn't going to have a significant effect on the production cIV. They have been telling us that it has been in MP alpha and beta testing for forever (well, over a year). All it means is that they AI will cheat outrageously in SP, but that it will still suck. SP wasn't going to be much better just because some part of the cIV team had a whole 2 more weeks to tune it, after all.
So, at most, it's just one more patch. Considering the mad modders around here, that isn't going to matter in the long run, is it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cataphract887
|
|
however much it dosnt matter,its still the principle of realising a crappy(patch-wise) game and charging money then fixing it with patches. or even worse,some compainies just do 2-3 patches and release the xpak aka finnaly 20% of game. RTW anyone?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
kolpo
|
|
I am happy that I shall get the game sooner. I think that take two is professional enough to realize that releasing a completely bugged game won't help their profits nor reputation.
Thought now that we are so close to release do I hope that we shall get an informative site and more info about civ4 
Last edited by kolpo on 11-09-2005 at 02:42
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|