 |
|
Zopperoni
|
|
The over/under was 50 or something, highest of all matchups...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:37
|
|
okay, the morons at Sports Illustrated have the BEARS ranked 32 in the league...
considering their track record the past two years, this may be a good year. Last year, they ranked the Chargers 32nd, the year before, the Panthers. 
nice job morons 
also, the same guy that picked the Bears 32nd, said they will go 3-13... but that they will BEAT the Redskins on Sunday. 
So after Sunday. The Bears, with possibly a top 10 (MAYBE EVEN TOP 5) NFL defense, will go 2-13 the rest of the season.
Now I know all about the history of rookie QB's. I'm not saying Kyle Orton is going to be Ben Rothlesberger.
But if the Bears can stay healthy, and get some lucky bounces, some good things can happen. Compare this team to 2001. The defense is better. The WR group is better. The O-line is about the same. The RB situation is about the same. QB is a question mark though. Can Orton be better than the 2001 combo of Jim Miller and Shane Mathews? I hope so.
Or else it could be a long year.
But I know this.
The rest of the NFC North sucks.
And when the rest of the division sucks and you have a good defense, ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN BABY!
GO BEARS!
 Attachment: bears800.jpg
This has been downloaded 76 time(s).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zopperoni
|
|
Yea, 4-12 is what I say too, and they'll lose 6-9 in a pathetic game on Sunday.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:37.
Apolyton Time is 00:37. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-09-2005 06:09
|
