 |
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
1) Previous experience:
ww2 with smaller civs (see my thread 'Arriba')
Rome (see my thread 'Delenda sunt')
Alexandre (see my thread 'Napoléon,...')
2) Conclusions:
Scenarios are FUN.
Scenarios are a nice way to compete in SP with good friends Apolytoners (experienced players not willing to specialize in OCC or early landing).
3) Therefore:
I shall publish here the results obtained playing 'Conflicts in Civilization' scenarios (+ a few words about what I liked and disliked).
Anyone willing to send his own results is free to do so, allowing us to build a tiny Hall of Fame.
4) Results:
I have played 6 scenarios out of 12, namely Alexandre, Alien, Apocalypse, Independence, Jihad and Napoléon.
Alexandre: DrFell holds the record (I must check the exact month)
Alien: 2044 Surf City conquered, Hodadian decisive defeat (I might have gone on conquering my fellow civs on earth, but felt satisfied with beating the aliens)
Apocalypse: Could not finish that game (bug: error message when Nuclear Fission is discovered)
Independence:
(as the Americans): August 1780, all cities are American (apart from Halifax/London and Port-au-Prince, defended by special units, La Fayette was satisfied with American independence and did not care with any more bloodshed)
(as the French): July 1782, no English city left (apart from Halifax/London, see above; La Fayette did not wish to start fighting his American friends).
Jihad: 731, all objectives Arab.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:14
|
|
As I posted in the Nappy, Alex, et al thread, I'd played Jihad a long time ago. I don't remember the long endgame, maybe I stopped partway thru. I'll try to make time for it this weekend - this week is my succession game turn.
My war for independence against the evil english is going slowly. I don't know where they are hiding. A popup informed me of british reinforcements arriving, but they apparently got waylayed in Canada. I'll try to finish that game, too.
I'm not sure I've tried the others, except Mongols. I know I didn't finish it, tho. Probably got sidetracked with the Rome scenario...
(the guy on the right is the Marquis as the Marchioness finds him when she returns home, the two on the left should already be in bed)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boco
|
 |
who was once King for a week.
Jan 2001 time: 00:14
|
|
By today's standards, Hoek is right. Many scenarios in CIC and FW were innovative in their day, but what was innovative then has now become the expected minimum. The community really has advanced far beyond CIC/FW. You'll be very pleasantly surprised at the level of quality, creativity, and fun that can be found in many contempory scenarios. Here are a few links to Ancient Times scenarios.
Personally, I like Celts and Iberians, the Roman invasion of the Iberian peninsula, by Jay Bee. Very atmospheric, tough terrain, and a nice balance of units. He's one of the best and well worth investigating. Check the forums at his site for comments on several of his scenarios:
Forum on Jay Bee's Scenarios
Spanish Civ2 Site (Scenarios)
Another master of this era is Kull. His finest (IMHO) to date is 'Seeds of Greatness'. Marvelous tech tree, good events, and very 'replayable'. Can be found here:
Kull's scenarios
Don't overlook BeBro's Imperium Romanum. I'm embarrassed to say I haven't played it yet, but from what I've read, it sets the standard for Rise of Rome scenarios.
BeBro's scenarios
I'm sure others can fill you in on other eras. Btw, I think all three of these authors are working on new scenarios.
Explore and have fun!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:14
|
|
I actually like many of the scenarios I've found over at the Spanish CivII site. All are top quality. Also, in the vein of our Rome fixation, there are several scenarios that are better than the default scenario.
I thought we were playing CiC scenarios initially because they (and ww2, rome) were available to all, regardless of game version. No harm in opening a thread about a particular scenario, to be sure!
BTW, La Fayette, in Independence, I was able to kick the english out of the south by december 1777. I've retaken Newport in june 1779. Alas, they still hold New York and Canada.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hoek
|
 |
of knock-you-off-your-ass chili
Jan 1970 time: 00:14
|
|
Any scenarios from the following people are high quality:
Hoek (one of the two I made is on the Spanish site, both are on CSC), Allard Hoefelt (that's my dawg!), Jesus Balsinde, Harlan Thompson, Micheal Daumen, Captain Nemo, Jon Petroski, Stefan Hartel...Jesus Munoz, Mike Jesenka, and Alex Mor also have some good ones. Go to CSC to find probably the largest selection, and the Spanish site keeps a little more up to date, also if you look at the Scenario League website, that could give you some decent reviews to guide you in selecting scenarios.
Here are some top-notch scenarios that I have enjoyed:
Alba de America-JB
Boer War-Allard
Red Front-Jon Petroski
Moscow-M Daumen
Mongols-Harlan Thompson
War of Cuba-Jesus Munoz+JB
Civil War-Captain Nemo
Spartacus-Alex Mor
WW2Pacific-Mike Jesenka
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
Boco and Hoek
Thank you for the tips.
As previously explained, my main objective when playing civ is to have FUN. I noticed a few months ago, playing ww2 with smaller civs, that great fun might be had even playing ancient scenarios and that some competition added to the fun.
I think that any of those who had a try at 'Rome' did enjoy it (even among those who are not in the tiny Hall of Fame today ).
That is why some of us started playing Cic scenarios on the same basis (have a try, post your results if you feel like it and discuss your mistakes if you feel like it).
AFAIK, before we started that, there were 3 ways to have fun competing when you were an experienced player at civ2, namely MP, OCC and early landing. Scenarios are a fourth way (and my own highway for the time being).
Scenarios provide a fair ground for friendly competition (and discussing mistakes is hopefully a nice way to reduce the number of mistakes you make afterwards).
My short term objective was to play all 12 scenarios in CiC + a few in FW (I have finished and loved X-Com, almost finished and disliked Midgard, especially because of boring endgame; in fact I got bored enough to stop with 2 tiny enemy cities still hidden somewhere in the black; and I am finishing Samurai now), so as to give a fair basis of comparison to anyone willing to play any of these (since I publish my results even if not satisfied with them).
But your tips make me wish to also have a try at some scenarios from the community. Thank you again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:14
|
|
quote: Originally posted by La Fayette
Some of us intend to play as many scenarios as possible in the near future.
Any good advice is welcome.
Therefore:
1) If you felt that some scenarios were weak, could you please explain why?
2) Can you remember the names of some scenarios made by the community that you enjoyed, and tell us where and how we can get them?
(this guy is La Fayette, eager to play the best scenario made by the community) |
La fayette:
I like historical scenarios, and felt inspired to create a "historical scenario meta page" which would not actually have any downloads, but would serve as a guide to the many sources of scenarios on the net. Unfortunately Im new at web site creation, and tried this on AOL hometown, and didnt back it up offline. AOL ate my page, and i have not yet felt encouraged enough to try again. Sounds like you would find something like this useful. Let me know, and i may try again.
LOTM
"La Fayette, we are here" - General John Pershing
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hermann the Lombard
|
|
Hoboken, NJ, USA
Jun 1999 time: 00:14
|
|
A question for Boco and Hoek (et al):
What scenarios can you recommend that are playable with v2.42? I've looked at the Scenario League items, and most scenarios require later versions of the game.
Thanks!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
Rereading, I realize that Mars is a FW scenario.
Wrong thread. Sorry. Excuse me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
If someone feels like competing 'realtime', my next game will be:
CIVILWAR (played as 'Kentucky' for the fun of it).
(Marquis
I'm sorry, the choice of Minnesota wasn't offered).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:14
|
|
quote: Originally posted by La Fayette
If someone feels like competing 'realtime', my next game will be:
CIVILWAR (played as 'Kentucky' for the fun of it).
(Marquis
I'm sorry, the choice of Minnesota wasn't offered). |
Ah, the Minnesotans of the day fought Union side. When they weren't killing Indians, that is. Just this year Virginia demanded Minnesota return a banner captured by a Minn. regiment in the Civil War. Our governor declared it as war spoils, loot not to be returned!
I will try to finish my war of Independence. New York is still under cruel English oppression! 
I'll play Jihad, but also ignore those far-flung objectives. Allah is just not too interested in them, I hear. The Arabic Sodaqi shall overcome!
The Civil War scenario as Kentucky might be fun, especially considering the unfavorable stereotypes of Kentuckians today. Having them conquer the US and Confederacy may be worth a laugh.
If time allows, perhaps I will rewrite the great war.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Marquis de Sodaq
|
 |
... no, a Marquis.
Jul 2000 time: 23:14
|
|
I've started playing as the Kentuckians, although the real ultimate challenge may be as the Indians. They look even more hopeless than the WWII Neutrals! Though they do start far out of the way... 
Luckily for my people, we have the secret tech of Quantum Physics, which allows the Alternate Universe wonder...
In my first failures, I have learned the following about leading Kentucky to glory in the American Civil War:- Kentucky is pathetic, backward, and defenseless. (In the scenario, too.)
- Do not talk to anybody except the Indians, you will only find war. They will talk to you if you meet them, go out of your way to avoid contact at all costs.
- Settle new cities immediately. Settlers are dirt cheap (10 shields!).
- Switch to monarchy after you save up some gold.
- Don't bother to research, sell your libraries.
- Rushbuild units continuously.
- Send out roving militias, the Union is keen to settle new towns without defenders. This is as good a source of gold as merchants. Also use them to pillage the roads that lead bad guys to Kentucky.
In my latest attempt, Kentucky has 7 cities in 1865, but the Confederates just declared war. Bowling Green is shrinking under the onslaught. The Union has been at war, but after sacking two new cities, I bought peace for 50g. I rush built an ironclad in Louisville, which has proven to be a key unit.
The special leader units commit suicide early when controlled by the AI. Watch out for Grant in the early going.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
La Fayette
|
|
albi, france
Oct 2000 time: 06:14
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Marquis de Sodaq
*]Kentucky is pathetic, backward, and defenseless. (In the scenario, too.)
|
I leave this opinion to YOU, Marquis.
I have the pleasure to announce that Ken Turk, glorious leader of the Kentuckians, is the proud owner of 14 objective cities, conquered from the Confederation after very hard fighting (up to 9 units lost for one city) in the month of may 1868, official time limit for this scenario.
In fact, the mighty Kentuckian troops stopped right in front of the proud city of FAYETTEVILLE, since the main adviser of Ken Turk advised not to sack a city bearing such a glorious name.
(snapshot of La Fayette, right in the middle of the main road to downtown Fayetteville)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:14. Apolyton Time is 00:14. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|