 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
molly bloom
|
 |
Lundenwic
Oct 2001 time: 15:16
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Wernazuma III
Stefu: Your list is much better than mine. The only thing I cannot follow is why Turks are Scientific, it doesn't seem to fit. The Phoenicians scientific? But well, that could go, if for nothing more than for game balance.
I agree with Jay Bee, Spanish should stay Militaristic Religious, maybe the Celts could be given Expansionist, Religious instead although they definitely were Militaristic. Hmmm...
|
Mmm....can't say I agree with you on the Celts being militaristic. For me, militarism has always implied a degree of organisation, a willingness to subdue individual or small scale concerns to a greater whole; the lack of organisation of the Celts, the inability to unify for any length of time contributed to the Roman victories over them- that and their indiscipline in battle, and the desire for personal glory on behalf of warriors.
I would actually stress the trading aspect of the Celts more, as they dealt with Greek and Phoenician and Etruscan traders as equals, their early Europe-wide rise to power was also founded on the extensive trade routes linked to the salt mines at Hallstatt:
http://www.stern.nyu.edu/~wyu/salt.html
http://www.accesscom.com/~wangbick/latene.html
The problem I have with the religious aspect is that although the Celts had a priestly caste, the religions/gods they followed differed from area to area, although some, like Lugh, were popular in various guises/incarnations over a wide area. Then of course you have the transition from pre-Christian faith to Christianity, and a change in Celtic culture. I think given the far-flung peregrinations of the Celtic monks and missionaries, the 'white martyrdoms' sought ought by Irish and British monks, the expansionist aspect of Celtic culture could, in a way, stand in for that.
Turkish, Arab and Islamic science:
http://www.geocities.com/~n4bz/gsr5/gsr502.htm
http://www.jannah.org/articles/contrib.html
http://www.ukans.edu/~ibetext/texts/paksoy-2/cam6.html
http://islam.about.com/gi/dynamic/o...story/scholars/
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rosacrux
|
 |
In a Galaxy far, far away...
Oct 2001 time: 05:16
|
|
Right-O! My NSH opinion on the current CSAs:
Militaristic - Expansionist Mongols, Turks =Mongols OK, for Turks you could use Religius-Expansionist, or Religious Militaristic. That should suit them better, they conquered under the banner of Islam and up to the 16th century were really serious about it.
Militaristic - Religious Spanish= Nah, Expansionist-Religious. I firmly disagree with the militaristic trait for the Spaniard
Militaristic - Scientific Polish = Not really "scientific", nor militaristic... but is there anything better? I'd have to think about this..
Militaristic - Industrious Ethiopians + Religious-industrious would be on spot more like it.
Militaristic - Commercial Vikings = Yo!
Expansionist - Religious Celts = Cool!
Expansionist - Scientific
Expansionist - Industrious Incas = Hmm... ok!
Expansionist - Commercial Portuguese = 100%
Religious - Scientific Mayans, Arabs = Good pick for the Arabs... the Mayans... dunno. Probably.
Religious - Industrious Khmer = I couldn't say.
Religious - Commercial Hebrews = Ya!!!
Scientific - Industrious Koreans = Scientfic? Koreans? Nah...
Scientific - Commercial Phoenicians = Again... why scientific? Mostly expansionist, if something. Darn, we need this "maritime" CSA...
Industrious - Commercial Dutch= OK!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pezeteros
|
|
Thessaloniki, Hellas
Dec 2001 time: 07:16
|
|
In my attempt to make it so that there is bo empty trait pair (thus just one double) I did the following 2 steps:
1) Set a 2 traits to each civ
2) Lessen doubles by doing some movings, so in the end there are no empties.
I think it is quite acurate IMHO for the most part. Well at least thats my proposal. Hope it is of some use
Militaristic - Expansionist : Mongols
Militaristic - Religious : Turks
Militaristic - Scientific : Khmer
Militaristic - Industrious : Celts, Ethiopians
Militaristic - Commercial : Vikings
Expansionist - Religious :Spanish
Expansionist - Scientific : Mayans
Expansionist - Industrious : Incas
Expansionist - Commercial : Portuguese
Religious - Scientific : Arabs
Religious - Industrious : Polish
Religious - Commercial : Hebrews
Scientific - Industrious : Koreans
Scientific - Commercial : Phoenicians
Industrious - Commercial : Dutch
|
|
|  |
 |
|
hoevenpe
|
|
Hi,
Wouldn't it be better to switch the Phoenecian and Dutch CSA?
So:
Phoenicians: Commercial / Industrious
Dutch: Commercial / Scientific
I think Dutch scientists (especially during the 1600s) have been contributing far more to world science that Phoenecian ones... The fact is also that the Dutch are a trading nation instead of a producing one.
But I agree, the way it is now is in my opinion the second best solution.
Keep up the good work!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
jsw363
|
|
Militaristic - Expansionist : Mongols
Militaristic - Religious : Turks
Militaristic - Scientific : Khmer
Militaristic - Industrious : Ethiopians
Militaristic - Commercial : Vikings
Expansionist - Religious :Spanish
Expansionist - Scientific : Mayans
Expansionist - Industrious : Celts
Expansionist - Commercial : Portuguese
Religious - Scientific : Arabs
Religious - Industrious : Polish
Religious - Commercial : Hebrews
Scientific - Industrious : Koreans, Incas
Scientific - Commercial : Phoenicians
Industrious - Commercial : Dutch
Here is my proposal for the CSA's. I don't especially like the Maya traits, but I guess that's the way it has to be. I don't see them as expansionist; I would prefer Commecial-Scientific. They never established a presence beyond the Yucatan and didnt' conquer many of the other minor tribes in thier region, so I don't think you could classify them as expansionist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:16. Apolyton Time is 00:16. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|