 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
It used to be only the strong.
How are we going to replace natural selection? It got us where we are today.
I think when we understand the human genome we will be able to get back on the evolutionary road instead of the devolutionary road.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Is this another thread about welfare? |
No, this is about improving the human gene pool.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
Some would argue abolishing welfare and government assistance may help that. |
It would, but that isnt politically feasable, and neither is it humane.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Starchild
|
 |
a raving alcoholic drama queen with a penchant for the biosciences
Jan 1970 time: 00:17
|
|
You want natural selection and evolution back? Forsake technology and live on the savanna-land with 1,000 other people. That gene pool should be small enough and exposed to harsh enough conditions to generate some interesting mutations.
Personally however, I quite like modern civilization. I like pointing out to my anti-technological friends that today's society is the richest, healthiest, best educated, and longest lived society to ever exist in the entire history of our species. We've gotten rid of most forms of natural selection (which is a brutal, harsh form of weeding, where thousands upon thousands die in exchange for a few, small improvements). Cultural, memetic evolution has replaced biological evolution as the driving force behind improvement.
And frankly, that's a good thing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
No..... letting evolution take its course on humankind might help the gene pool in the long run (a million years or so) but in the short term it will be catastrophic!
If you suddenly unplug everything (medical care, welfare etc) which are currently suspending human evolution, the following will happen:
Life Expectancy will plunge to thirty.
All the plagues, like malaria, typhus, bubonic plague, measles, rubella, polio etc will resume wrecking havoc.
Infant Mortality will rise to something like 50%.
The result?
Half of us around here would be dead in a couple of years. All of you (and me) teenagers would be half-way thru life. Thirty and over will be old age. And for every two kids you have one will die before the age of five.
Evolution is dependent on the death of the weaker and the unluckier...
If evolution suddenly resumes in today's world, the consequences on our living standards and societal structure will be catastrophic.
So..... wait out these few thousand years. There's no way the gene pool will degrade by too much. After a few centuries genetic engineering most probably will be employed to continue where evolution left off - to improve the gene pool.
Last edited by ranskaldan on 17-01-2002 at 08:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Starchild
You want natural selection and evolution back? |
NO! I am talking about how we will be able to manipulate the human genome to our advantage when the tech gets advanced enough.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Goingonit
Eugenics is only used by nazis and other people who should be designated as hate criminals should they ever manage to pull anything off. |
Thats not true actually. The US and many european counries had eugenics programs going long before hitler came to power. If it wasnt for Hitlers abuse of eugenics it would probably still be in practice today.
quote: Originally posted by Goingonit
It's a fine line between wiping out all the handicapped people (even if it's by manipulating their genomes) and wiping out people with other "undesirable" traits. You start talking about people being intrinsically better or worse than others. |
The fact is that some people are intrinsically better or worse than others. Just as in the plant and animal kingdom, because after all, we are just glorified monkeys.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by *End Is Forever*
Well, the "logical" thing to do for a start is to discourage (or prevent, even?) those likely to pass on obvious genetic disadvantages (initial thinking - Huntington's, Cystic Fibrosis) from procreating. This is extremely thin ice however... I mean, where do you stop? Thick people? People with red hair? "Can of worms", anyone?
|
That would be logical, but its not politically feasable at this point.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
Free condoms, Free birth control pills, Free sterilization. |
That would be a good start.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|