 |
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:17
|
|
Why is it, do you suppose, that the US has a higher portion of Christian nutjobs than anyone else in the West/industrialized world? I've been pondering this lately, but with no real success. We've got people burning Harry Potter books because they're satanic; we've got people who force their schools to cancel Halloween celebrations; we've got people trying (sometimes successfully) to put biblical fairy-tales of creation into science curricula; we've got religious extremists (Pat Robertson, for example) who play a significant role in national party politics; we've got places (say, Texas) where you get seven people in a room together and, presto, you've got a new Protestant sect.
No other Western nation seems plagued with this. I don't think it's because the US is inherently given to extremism; on the contrary, there's more extremism in European politics and intellectual thought than in the US, and Europe can probably match us one-for-one on the high- and pop-culture front. But there's something about Jesus that brings out the loonies in the US to a greater degree than anywhere else. Theories, anyone?
edit: and yes, I know my spelling is "apalling." 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
could it be that there are just more christians in the US
thus (if there are ther same percentage of nutjobs) there are more nutjobs
and it is in the nutjobs nature to stand out
(and I think that christianity makes just as many ntjobs as any other ideology or beleif (and despite what some people say, having no beleif would be very bad/it would be an extremely boring world)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
change end of line two to be
more christian nutjobs (ie christian nutjobs make up a higher percentage of the nutjob population)
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Thue
|
|
Copenhagen, Denmark
Jan 1970 time: 06:17
|
|
The whole US retoric seem to be more in the direction of religious nut jobs. If someone in Denmark were to say "this happened thanks to god", like your presidents do, people would just roll their eyes.
In the US it seems to be a sign of a good and stable citizen citizen to be religious and saying things like the above, and so politicians are seen being religious in public. In Denmark the mark of a stable and rational person (like a politician should be) seems to be an atheist. At most you will see people from the most christian party say they live by the christian ideals.
It does not surprise me that in a society where the ideal person (the public person the presidents try to be) can attribute actions and results in the physical world directly to god, more people turn out to be nut jobs.
Last edited by Thue on 17-01-2002 at 18:09
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lars-E
|
|
What about historical reasons? We all know that many persecuted European christians came to the US. Now, if there are more nutjobs per capita, hmmmm. The American way of life, perhaps: Fullfill your dream, etc. Freedom, do what you want.
But if these nutjobs play such a dominant role in hi-level politics how come the US is the leading country in the world?
Chegitz, ppl have been saying that for 2000 years.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lars-E
What about historical reasons? We all know that many persecuted European christians came to the US. Now, if there are more nutjobs per capita, hmmmm. The American way of life, perhaps: Fullfill your dream, etc. Freedom, do what you want. |
Actually, the colonies were mostly a straightforward commercial proposition. The US likes to embrace the "escape from religious persecution" myth, but it really only applies to Massachusetts and Pennsylvania (unless you count Rhode Island, which is where people fled to to escape the tyrannical nutjobs in Massachusetts). And even if it is about freedom, why, given all this freedom, would we turn into a nation of snake-handling looney toons? Why not use the freedom for something extreme but cool, like orgies or something?
Sikander's point about the absence of an offical church is one I've seen made before, and I do think that has something to do with it.
quote: But if these nutjobs play such a dominant role in hi-level politics how come the US is the leading country in the world? |
Well, we have this kickass economy and this big military and all these natural resources. That helps. But look at our political rhetoric during an election year, and you'll see the role this plays. It's not just silly stuff, like Al Gore claiming he likes to think "What Would Jesus Do?" It's the way, for example, that abortion has become a political lightening rod. No other major nation has that particular problem.
Please note that nothing I'm saying should be taken as anti-Christian -- just anti-nutjob. It's like Europe got the Christian equivalent of Sunni Muslims, and we got the equivalent of the Taliban. How come?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Roland
|
 |
Auf'm Jahrmarkt :(
May 1999 time: 06:17
|
|
As for the starting position, I'd assume that around 1800, you would not find much difference in religious fervour between the US and Europe.
Monocausal explanations never work, but one big reason might be that the US is intellectually relatively sterile or stagnant. That is not negative in this context. In the US many ideas had won in the late 18th century that were still being fought out in Europe. As a consequence, the US was progressive back then, but had little reason to _be_ progressive further. Add to that that the big western landgrab acted as safety valve for many social problems. Socialism never really made it, and Fascism was present but controllable even in the great depression. The leftist agenda of the 60s was only partially implemented, and has been reversed since Reagan.
In Europe, those crucial issues remained unsettled for longer, and with the political instability, the nutjobs moved on to Hitlerism and Stalinism (religion and church in an extreme version), in the US they stuck with ordinary religion. Actually a pretty small price to pay for being spared 50 million dead. But religious extremism went under.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Locutus
|
|
ACS CTP1/2 Manager & Civ4 Co-Manager
|
 |
Hengelo, The Netherlands
Nov 1999 time: 06:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Snapcase
State funding of religious and other private schools is a relatively new Phenomenon in sweden and one that (hopefully) will be reversed soon. "Free Schools" drain resources from public schools while obviously giving out unbalanced education. |
Well, of course I don't know the situation in Sweden but in my experience religious schools in the Netherlands are better than non-religious schools: next to the standard curricullum(sp?), most of them have a course which (most) non-religious schools in the Netherlands seem to lack. It's called something like 'life philosophies' (I'm not sure what the proper English term would be): it educates students about religions and other ways of life: Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Confusionism, atheism (humanism and other forms), New Age, etc. IMHO it was by far the most valuable course I ever followed in my entire life.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
absimiliard
|
|
NE USA
Nov 2001 time: 05:17
|
|
Abortion-clinic bombings Loin. That's pretty much all that needs be said.
(But I will grant you that none of them have military forces capable of taking on the secular government, though I believe that's less by their choice than by necessity.)
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|