 |
|  |
 |
|
Antonin
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Andy-Man
The reason we are all pissed is because it got our hopes up about being the modern version of Civ2...for what we expect from a Civilization game, civ3 is very poor. |
We????? WE????
Kindly speak for yourself. There is far too much "we" being tossed around by you grief players who have nothing better to do than try to gain the "right" to say to your chatroom buddies that "I singlehandedly torpedoed Civ3 and Firaxis!"
It's like tossing a stink bomb into a crowded theater and giggling as you run out the door. You are doing it simply because you can, because anybody can use the internet to say anything about anything, without consequences.
Having other things to do with my time, I don't come to this forum that often. But every time I'm here, it's the same people gnawing the same bone the same way. There's something very strange about that.
It's a computer game, people. If it's so important to you that the "defects" you imagine to be in it are consuming your every waking moment, then maybe it's time to seek help.
I've said it before and I'll say it again:
Hate Civ3? Don't play it.
And of course, when you guys finish developing your own computer games, instead of just rambling on about somebody else's, be sure to let me know so I can subject your work to a little gentle criticism...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Willem
|
 |
Canada
Dec 2001 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Andy-Man
if us whiners are so bad, stop whining about us. you are just making the problem worse. |
Sometimes you critics don't leave anyone any choice. You jump into threads just so you can make some snide comment, or hurl an insult. Your comments appear everywhere, and frankly it gets rather tiresome. Why don't you just start your own thread and all of you can hang around bashing the game, and Firaxis, and leave everyone else alone?
If you have a beef with the game that's fine, and sometimes I even agree with you. But why does everyone need to know your opinions, all the time, every thread they go to? Does it accomplish anything? No. It only annoys the people that do enjoy the game, and though you may not like to admit it, there are a lot of them hanging around here.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:17
|
|
quote: and in the end you've practically destroyed your reputation(instead of civ3's sales numbers). soon we wont be saying "whiner" but "yiner" | Now THAT'S the spirit, Markos! You had me worried earlier with the slightly hurt response. Glad to know you can still troll with some dignity.
First, as regards my 'reputation,' I never came here to get a reputation, and I certainly won't leave if some people think my reputation is 'destroyed.' In fact, I find that entire line of reasoning to be very funny. I have been consistent from Day 1: I support the hell out of something when it appears that such support will make a difference, and then I criticise the hell out of something when it's being handled in the most inept manner. I've always been that way and always will be.
As to this whole 'whiners aren't helping anything' argument, we all know that's simply not true. Of course there are empty and mean whines that no doubt make it difficult for anybody at Firaxis to want to read and think about, but if you ask me:
When anybody from Firaxis pops onto the general forum here even for a moment and begins to read the mountains of criticism, even from people who initially supported the game but realized after more than 3 sessions that there are actually very serious problems...well, I can't help but think a dose of reality (yes, throw in the reader responses from Gamespot as opposed to the clueless 'professional' score) will make it VERY clear to the folks at Firaxis that the next patch or two will be critical.
Not nice additions. Not going the extra mile. CRITICAL to the game's success.
And frankly, if having a bunch of whiners here helps make that message clear, we are doing more to help Civ3 than entire fleets of blind fanboys who accept crap and, in fact, seemed to enjoy the flavor.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tarquelne
|
|
From yin26's last long post:
"we all know"
There it is yet again! Bloody hell!
"mountains of criticism"
We all know [insert 5 paragraphs of sarcasm].
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MOHonor
|
|
Nashville, TN
Jan 2001 time: 05:17
|
|
Told.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tarquelne
|
|
"Yes, WE all DO know that if there were NO criticism of the game, the likelihood of it being patched in any significant way would be next to nil. This is common sense and you can't argue otherwise. "
Bloody hell #2! If the above was what you had actually wrote then I probably wouldn't have argued with it. But that's NOT what you applied the "we all know" to!
You wrote: "As to this whole 'whiners aren't helping anything' argument, we all know that's simply not true."
I for one, agree that cirticism is helpfull... but most of what the self-proclaimed "critics" are spewing is better characterized as "whining."
Please, everybody, stop with the damned "we all knows", OK? The _only_ things they accomplish is:
1) Reaffirm the prejudices of those who already agree with you.
and
2) Tick me off.
Neither one is usefull.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tarquelne
|
|
"And WE also know that there IS a mountain of criticism regarding Civ3.
The above are simple truths. "
Actually, I do think that "mountain of criticism" is debatable.
There's a mountain of something.... but _I_ think that the "something" is not "criticism" but rather "whining about the fact that Civ3 isn't simply an updated and expanded Civ2 or SMAC."
"See, you are confused. I never said "We all know the game sucks." Got the difference?"
_I'm_ confused? And when did I attribute that statement to you?
"Hey, it's not my problem how you mis-read perfectly clear English."
Please point out where I did so.
"To me, whiners are complainers."
So you make no distinction between them? We all know you should.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yin26
|
 |
This space reserved for Darkstar.
Apr 1999 time: 14:17
|
|
Tarquelne:
You seem like a reasonable guy. Part of the problem here is that the moment anybody criticises this game, they run the dangerous course of summarily being called a 'whiner.' Yes, I am well aware of the difference between those who go to great lengths to support their arguments and those who make pithy remarks seemingly just to stir up trouble. Yet, I have seen the broad 'whiner brush' paint both camps rather liberally.
Yet for the sake of your call for clarification, I will amend my post above by saying that I see "constructive and consistent" criticism to be good for Civ3. Now, to many people here, constructive and consistent are oxymorons...to which I would normally agree except to say that it is, therefore, Firaxis' job to keep us more informed as to what is going on.
Yet, they don't. Thus, the consistent complaint. And, therefore, the often mis-used term: "Whiner."
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|