 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
I'm a Canadian and biased but
1. as a layperson it was obvious the Canadians were flawless in a program they have done before in international competition and garnered top marks. Why would the same program done BETTER garner lower marks ?
2. The professional commentators were certain of the Canadian victory before the marks were announced. These are professional skaters who should have a clue about what is going on. I have never seen them be this emphatic about a result and be wrong and Canadians have come close to gold many times in the past in skating events with no outcry.
3. The reactions of Sale and pelltier themselves made it obvious they knew they had nailed the program and the look of suprise and shock on their faces at the marks was obvious and genuine. They KNEW they had won. They are experienced skaters that have competed for many years. Are we saying that the skaters themselves are wrong?? Did not everyone see the dejected demeanour of the Russians after they skated . . . they KNEW they had not skated well.
4. As I understand figure skating scoring, it is all about rankings. If the 2nd place in the short program wins the long program, they win the competition. They do not aggregate the marks so if the Canadians won the long program the gold was theirs.
5. Arguments about the greater difficulty just don't cut it . Doing slightly harder things badly does not qualify for higher marks. Consider the mens program where skaters who attempted and failed on a quad were marked much lower than skaters that cleanly completed a triple. To get credit for the harder element, you have to complete it successfully.
This is ice dance all over again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ming
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
True, but doing easy things flawlessly doesn't cut it either. Apparently what killed the Canadians was their presentation. Boring, lackluster, killing time performance doesn't get you points. Also, they had ugly grey uniforms (and believe, that's part of presentation). They just weren't very interesting to watch, even if they did it well. |
I watched both pairs skate (when your daughter competes in the same sport, you can't avoid watching it) and I had the exact opposite reaction that you did. The Russian pair didn't even look graceful most of the time... it was almost painful to watch... and when they finished, the looks on their faces said it all. They knew they hadn't done their best.
On the other hand, the Canadians looked so good, and it surely wasn't boring, lackluster, or a killing time performance. Their confidence and perfection matched with their emotion made for a powerful performance....
But again... just one person's opinion (well... two, my daughter agrees with me)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:17
|
|
Like I said, I can't say anything about the Russians (except that they had a harder routine). I'm comparing the Canadians with the Chinese, who, despite a fall, had an amazing performance.
I have the misfortune of having a GF who simply adores figure skating, and thus I am forced to watch large quantities of this sport. Along the way, I've picked up on some of things judges consider.
I forget the name of the French skater several years ago, who was doing back and front flips on the ice. I was floored, I'd never seen this before, and despite her flawless performace, she failed to win the gold. Why, she wasn't skating as fast or as low as the other skaters, thus reducing her level of difficulty. Of course, it didn't help that she's Black in a sport that dislikes working class and minority (with the exception of Asians, now) skaters.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
blackice
|
 |
Canada where else...
Sep 2000 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ming
I watched both pairs skate (when your daughter competes in the same sport, you can't avoid watching it) and I had the exact opposite reaction that you did. The Russian pair didn't even look graceful most of the time... it was almost painful to watch... and when they finished, the looks on their faces said it all. They knew they hadn't done their best.
On the other hand, the Canadians looked so good, and it surely wasn't boring, lackluster, or a killing time performance. Their confidence and perfection matched with their emotion made for a powerful performance....
But again... just one person's opinion (well... two, my daughter agrees with me) |
Just a wild guess but I would say from what I have read, seen, heard we are the majority of percentage world wide by far of the people who agree with THEY WERE SCREWED. The minority, by a mile seem to have chegitz guevara's opinion, a very small percentage.
I heard tonight on the news that the French judge said she was ordered by her government to vote Russian in exchange for the russians to vote France in the dance competition.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:17
|
|
vagabound
Ihave seen a lot of Canadian figure skaters lose out in close competition to Russian/ soviet skaters over the years. It is a tribute to the strength of the Russian/Soviet program. In a couple of those years the natural bias I hold led me to think that perhaps the canadians had deserved to win but each time i could accept the result because it WAS close and i could see how the other skater(s) could be seen as the winner -- I have a bias but am aware of it and in those competitions I could accept the result and cheer wholeheartedly for the winners.
Not this time. The canadians performed close to perfect while there were several errors in the Russian program. The winner was obvious and we celebrated as the Canadians had skated the best on that night.
So you cannot put this off to national bias or sour grapes. yes i am a proud Canadian but I have accepted close losses before with equanimity. This time it stinks, the decision was obviously political and harkens back to the ice dance competition of 4 years ago when prior to the competition a person predicted with perfect accuracy the top 5 placings of 5 of the judges (and named which judges would form the voting bloc). The other 4 judges had variation among themselves and some downright disagreement with the 5 judge majority but the majority was perfectly aligned as predicted and corruption was widely acknowledged after the fact.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:17
|
|
Very true, but they really hated her and loved Nancy Kerrigan. I remember constantly seeing stories talking about what a horrible person Harding was, and how wonderful Kerrigan was. The irony, of course, is from thos people who knew them, Tanya was a very nice and sweet person while Nancy earned the title Ice Queen. The reality of their personalities didn't matter. The press and judges loved the middle class woman and hated the working class girl with the termerity to rise above her station.
Now, Kerrigan was a much better skater than Harding, I'm not denying this. Nor did I deny that the French skater wasn't as good as I originally thought she was. What looked amazing to my untrained eye (at the time) was infact, not all that hard, which is the main reason she didn't score well (which I stated previously).
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|