 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Emperor Fabulous
|
 |
Apolyton's Resident Actor-in-Training
Aug 1999 time: 00:17
|
|
Oh, I made it up...there is actually nothing in the Bible (that I have found) to explain these.
However, that seems to be the logical (note: logical by creationist standards) explainations.
Oh, also, to answer more questions:
Dino's could have existed because, though God made the world in 7 days, it never said how long Adam and Eve were in the Garden.
Pangea was during the day that God made the land, then seperated it to create the continents.
Also, Adam and Eve had far more children then just Caine and Abel. I like to use Iceland as an example for a perfectly homogeneous population with few if any defects. Its not impossible (especially if God has a hand in it) to not have defects even though there is incest.
Plus, it was not the animals who were evil, but the people. The reason God had Noah bring two of each animal aboard was not to save the good ones, but to prevent species extinction, due to the flood. There's no such thing as an "evil fish." Well, at least not due to the flood.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
The Emperor Fabulous
|
 |
Apolyton's Resident Actor-in-Training
Aug 1999 time: 00:17
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Ahhhh. So they lived in the Garden for 60+ million years. After that, humanity started measuring their lifespans in decades. Makes perfect sense to me. |
'Scuse? Know how long Noah, Abraham, and Moses lived? In the Garden, Adam and Eve were in paradise. No disease, no pestilence, not even heartburn. They were immortal. God created Adam as His prime "trophy", and Eve as Adam's companion. When they ate the Forbidden Fruit, God punished them by making them susceptible to all of these, and threw them out of the Garden, for they had disobeyed. If you think about it in a religious sense, it DOES make sense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
well according to the Bible
before the flood man measured his days in 100s of years (like 900)
and of course, before sin there was no death of mankind at all (according to the Bible)
then after the flood, lifespan quickly decreased so that the ancient were 80 (and the really famously long lived were 120)
(note the loss of lifespan is linked by some scholars to generations away from the Tree/ the effects of sin)
so according to the Bible, living 60+ million years pre eating of the fruit is no trouble at all
Jon Miller
(can't beleive that I am the only one who knows this stuff)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
Wanna try that again? |
I started before you posted
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Actually, Jon, I knew that stuff too.
EF, I can't think "religiously." I don't know how to describe my thoughts ("rational arrogance" comes to mind - after all, I always think I'm right and make perfect sense. ), but "religiously" is not one of them. |
See, I guess my understanding is that Man in the garden is the same state as Man in heaven will be (I think that this is an obvious conclusion (but not the only possible) from the Bible).
Therefore, Man would not die in the Garden.
So, if you think that Man would die pre sin, I would consider that a much bigger issue then any creationism.
BTW, Creationism does not maintain that God created the Universe at any recent time.
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:17. Apolyton Time is 00:17. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|