 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
academia
|
 |
Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Dec 2001 time: 01:18
|
|
Sorry, but i mantain my position about railroads unlimited movement. It´s something totally unrealistic.
No matter the scenario.
Nothing personal against you Darius, but we played that game, and you know that I quit because it would turn into something stupid, tedious, unrealistic.
It was like this:
Russian turn (Darius), they conquer like 30 cities in France, Germany, Turkey or Austria.
Then, Italy (myself) use the same railways and reconquer the 30 cities.
And over and over again. Ok, in the long run someone may win... but I don´t want to participate in this kind of "war".
In reference to the trench system... i´m not criticizing the use of defenses. You are right, they were really poor. But i´m just questioning that in one turn, a unit built in Rostov, (for example) can reach Brest!!! or maybe Milan or Beirut!!!
Maybe with the trench systems, you could interfere with the progress, but the point is that you have to kill the engineers. If you leave them alive, they´ll find the way to built a railway that will eventually reach your city.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Darius871
|
 |
Smith, Wesson, and the RODINA!!!
Mar 2002 time: 23:18
|
|
I disagree totally. As I said, if the enemy had any sort of realistic defenses it would have been five cities taken with high casualties rather than 30+.
Perhaps a plan here would be an agreement by all to have no war for a full ten years so that everyone will be able to build defenses that would negate the railroad problem. With cut railroads, strategic fortress fronts, and trenches in all cities, I guarantee you that there could be nothing even resembling my civfan campaigns.
Decent defenses do not alleviate the problem, they fix it. It takes three artillery units to kill one conscript unit in a trench system (two artillery if veteran). Furthermore, if the enemy has a veteran machine gun in an entrenched city, it is impossible to take the city with even veteran artillery. I did a test game myself (fell free to do it too), and indeed I ran dozens and dozens of veteran artillery units into an entrenched, fortified, veteran machine gun unit and didn't even damage it.
So another proposal would be for us to forego all war for ten years for two purposes:
1) We all are able to build fortress fronts, entrench cities,cut any superfluous border railroads, and even build fortresses on railroads between cities.
2) One civ rush-builds the Arms Race wonder, selects Advanced Ballistics as one of its two options, and then gifts the technology to all other 6 civs. Then the machine guns will be able to augment the defenses we would be building, thereby making all existing armies obsolete in a manner more historically realistic.
Would anyone agree with this plan?
Last edited by Darius871 on 08-08-2002 at 09:51
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jacobite1688
|
 |
Chicago, IL U.S.A.
Jul 2001 time: 23:18
|
|
Unrealistic? Are you kidding us?
quote: Originally posted by academia
Nothing personal against you Darius, but we played that game, and you know that I quit because it would turn into something stupid, tedious, unrealistic.
|
I never have heard such an accurate description of the First World War: stupid, tedious, unrealistic. Listen to yourself:
quote: Originally posted by academia
It was like this:
Russian turn (Darius), they conquer like 30 cities in France, Germany, Turkey or Austria.
Then, Italy (myself) use the same railways and reconquer the 30 cities.
And over and over again.
|
A stalemate that could go on for years (sound familiar?) until...
quote: Originally posted by academia
Ok, in the long run someone may win... but I don´t want to participate in this kind of "war".
|
Exactly, the same moral that's in the cold war era film WAR GAMES. In industrialized warfare, the only way to insure victory is not play, just like the game tic tac toe. It's a stupid waste of time because nobody ever wins.
Yes, I agree with not entering into war, but for diplomatic reasons, not as a 'rule' that is forced on to this scenario.
As for sharing tech, again a diplomatic call, not as a rule.
Remember when Ole Ronald Regan 'promised' to share SDI technology with the Soviets. HA! I like Ron, but that would have happened when monkeys flew out of his arse! No, not as a rule...as always, if I am out voted six to one I'm not gonna quit, but
I don't want any changes!
Edited to fix the quote, all other errers left in tact 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Civfan
|
|
Toronto, Canada
Sep 1999 time: 05:18
|
|
if the limit of railroads is not possible, only course of action is to beef up your defenses. Fortresses on railroads, cut railroads and trenches. Its a part of the game/scenario. So lets continue as it is.
Whos turn is it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
academia
|
 |
Buenos Aires, ARGENTINA
Dec 2001 time: 01:18
|
|
quote: That's four - a majority. Lets get on with it. |
Ok, if that´s the decision of the majority...
Then I´ll inform you that i decline to continue with this game.
As I said a few posts above, i don´t want to experience the same kind of war. I´ve already given my arguments. If you don´t pay attention or simply don´t care about it; no problem is up to you guys.
But personally, i don´t want to go on.
As some of you said: this is an scenario made by a human-being with its problems; it´s not perfect.
And If I filled in for Germany, i had done it before taking notice of this problem. well, not problem, characteristic of the scenario.
Guys:
No hard feelings. It´s your decision. Good luck, and try to enjoy this scenario. Personally, i feel that this unlimited movement doesn´t fit in this historical situation.
Darius:
Hehe, you know how to win this game... Good luck!!
About the file, don´t worry; there´s no password.
See you

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jacobite1688
|
 |
Chicago, IL U.S.A.
Jul 2001 time: 23:18
|
|
I'm not suggesting we should abandon this game, lets get another player and continue.
NOW, like I said in the Hellas thread, I would like to start a game just with players who PLAY: Darius, ANZAC, sas, & Cyrion (or anybody else you can vouche for.) I'm not one to judge w/o knowing someone, so I'll extend this to Civfan, too. Somebody start a scenario and let's play! I don't even care what it is or what my country is! I started playing PBEMs back in the spring and between two games I've had about four turns so far! What do you say to one more PBEM?
Oh, and I'll start a thread to find a new Germany, if that is the plan. Let me know or DIY.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18. Apolyton Time is 00:18. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|