 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Korpo
|
|
Ortenburg, Bavaria, Germany
Aug 1999 time: 06:19
|
|
It is really funny this talk about antisemitic Europeans.. especially since it's well known that there is a large muslimic minority in France, members of which are likely to be responsible for the synagogue attacks. Since these are immigrants, and their hatred arises out of the Middle-East tensions between Arab muslims and Jewish Israelis (and especially orthodox and fundamentalist hardliners on both sides), it is a pretty stretch to conclude there is a historical habit of antisemitism in Europe still today. It's simply utter crap. A bit of Zionist propraganda on the small scale, someone's own agenda.
The real question, though, remains this:
1) Why of all people have the Israelis, or at least their elected governments, not learned a lession out of WWII and the holocaust?
2) The Israelis have economic wealth, education, a liberal democracy (or at least they had) and freedom. Why do they envy the arabs in Palestine even for the land they live on, build settlements?
It is a strange irony that a democracy is an oppressor of the people of Palestine. It is very clear, why the Arabs ressort to terrorism: it is the only lever in this struggle they have left. If you corner an animal, it will go berzerk. The people of Palestine have been cornered for 50 years, living as refugees, without political stability or their own land.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Korpo
The real question, though, remains this:
1) Why of all people have the Israelis, or at least their elected governments, not learned a lession out of WWII and the holocaust?
2) The Israelis have economic wealth, education, a liberal democracy (or at least they had) and freedom. Why do they envy the arabs in Palestine even for the land they live on, build settlements?
|
I think the lesson the Israelis learned from World War II and the Holocaust is that they must defend themselves because they cannot rely on the "civilized" world, particularly the Europeans, to defend them when they are attacked. It is remarkable that the United States, seemingly alone, understands this and at the Europeans do not.
Ned
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Natan
|
 |
New York State
Sep 2000 time: 00:19
|
|
What I love is how Europeans explain that they're not anti-Semitic because it's all the Arabs fault and use animal analogies on the Palestinians. (yes, I know that the vast majority of Europeans are neither racist nor anti-Semitic, but it does strike me as a strange defense - we're not racist, you have us confused with that race of racists, who don't count as us because despite sharing citizenship in our countries, they have dark skin and Saracen faith!)
Please, terrorism is a political strategy. People use it to help them achieve their objectives. When people truly are cornered and beaten, they submit, as the Sunnis did in Syria, the Maronites in Lebanon, and the Shi'ites in Iraq.
And I don't particularly see the relevance of the Holocaust to the matter.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Saint Marcus
|
 |
Scio Me Nihil Scire
Jan 1970 time: 06:19
|
|
yeah, I'm still waiting for someone to tell me the difference between freedom fighters and terrorists.
Now, Ashcroft labeled kidnapping an act of terrorism. There used to be a time when blowing up military outposts was consider guerilla warfare, when kidnapping was simply a crime and when building WMD was simply "building WMD". Now, it's all "terrorism". The Colombian rebels are terrorists. As are the Palestinians. And the Chechnyans. And the Falun Gung. And Sadam Hussein. And the North Koreans. And the UCK. And the Molukkers. And the Kashmeri rebels. And the Nepalese Maoists. etc, etc, etc, etc, etc.
Basically, anyone not on your side is a terrorist. And to them, you are a terrorist as well. If you kidnap someone you are a terrorist. If you developed a nuke you are a terrorist, unless you are pro-west, or Chinese. If you opose the governement of your country, you are are a terrorist as well.
Total and complete bullshit. The whole war on terrorism is complete bullshit. The whole axis of evil rethoric is bullshit. Hell, this entire planet is made up of bullshit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
notyoueither
|
 |
of naught
Aug 2001 time: 22:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by axi
And it has rules, which are broken by people in uniform who are targetting civilians. How anbout the Geneva convention?
Anyway, who said that because something is war, it is justified? War on terrorism isn't justified, fe... |
The Geneva Conventions may not apply in all cases. They have limits. They were not written with an eye to hand-cuff nations who are involved in hostilities with other nations who do not recognize those Conventions.
Your earlier allusion to Vietnam is an interesting one. It is probably the last time the United States will use area bombing in the belief that it will win a war. It demonstrably will not.
At the same time, the United States was involved in a conflict with a government which did not recognize, or certainly did not abide by, the Conventions. In such a case, the Conventions do not apply to their nationals in their territory.
At any rate, yes. The area bombing of German and Japanese cities during the second world war were not pleasant things. Neither was the area bombing of North Vietnam. I think most Western countries today would go out of there way to avoid such actions because in none of the cases did it lead to an end of hostilities. Except for the case of Japan, but then the Japanese were threatened with total and complete nuclear destruction (they didn't know there were no more bombs at the time).
'War on terrorism isn't justified'? How so? When a state sponsors hostile acts against another state, that is an act of war according to international law.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|