 |
|
Jethro83
|
|
Newcastle, Australia
Mar 2002 time: 15:13
|
|
Hey Eroberer! Stop threadjacking!
Back ON TOPIC...
The civs I think might have a chance of getting in:
- Spanish
- Carthaginians
- Celts
- Vikings
- Mongols
- Arabs
- Incas
- Koreans
So therefore I agree with much of the consensus here.
As for UU's, Spanish = Conquistador, Carthage = ??? Some kind of elephant (elephant archer maybe), Celts = Woad Raider, Vikings = Longboat (or Berserker), Mongols = Mangudai, Arabs = Mameluke, Incas = ???, Koreans = Turtle ship
Sure a lot of them are the same as the UUs in AOE II, but that's because there is some history behind such units.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
monkspider
|
 |
banned
Aug 2001 time: 23:13
|
|
Here's what I posted in the Civilizations forum
Alright, we have to remember Firaxis is going to try to keep sort of a balance in terms of cultural regions (mediterranean, Asian, Middle East, American, european)
I have also come to the realization that the civ picture can be broken down in to three brackets
Shoe-Ins
-------------------------------
1. Mongols (asia)
2. Spain (europe)
3. Inca (America)
4. Carthage (mediterranean)
5. Vikings (europe)
From here on out, three further civs will appear in the game
Contenders
-------------------------------
Arabs
Hebrews
Ethiopians
Turks
Koreans
On the outside, looking in
-------------------------------
Polynesians
Nubians
Celts
Dutch
Maya
Cherokee/Sioux
I think the Turks are the most interesting wildcard in all of this. In that, they are very unlikely to be included if the Arabs are included, since I think it is more likely Firaxis will group the turks under the Arab umbrella than the Arabs under the Turkish umbrella. However, they are the once civ that can justifiably considered part of two different culture groups. But in any scenario that they do get in the game, it would almost have to be one where the Arabs are out.
An interesting dark horse in all of this could be Nubia. All it would take is for Firaxis to deciede to that they would be a better African civ to add than Ethiopia/Axum and they are very likely to make it in. Interestingly, Nubia did make it in to the recent Rise of Nations roster. Darkhorse civs Khmer and Polynesia are in a similar situation, however I think Korea is on more stable ground than it's Ethiopian couterpart.
With that said, I'm going to go on the record with an 8 civ prediction for the first time in this thread. I say it will be the 5 shoe-ins, plus
6. Arabs (middle east)
7. Korea (asia)
8. Ethiopians/Aksumites (middle east)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Insigna
|
|
Spain Could Be Mediterranean That would solve some problems.
The Arabs could be asian. Here is my list.
Spain (mediterranean)
Carthage (mediterranean)
Inca
Isreal
Vikings (europe)
Celts
Mongols (asia)
Arabs (asia)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Insigna
|
|
Good UU's Might be...
Spanish: Conquistador
Vikings: Longship (that would suck for anyone wanting to play as the vikings)
Celts: probaly some upgraded warrior
These civs could be same as AOE II Mongols Korea Arabs
Poblem is what would therse civs get: Polish Inca Ethiopia
Inca Hebrews
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
loleod
|
|
Boston
Apr 2002 time: 00:13
|
|
I dont see why people keep on making a big deal about XP ( Expansion Pack ) having the same initials as XP ( Windows XP). People have used XP as expansion pack before microsoft used it for its product. Following the logic of some I cant say ME andymore ( Cause of Windows ME) , I cant make reference to the years 98 or 95 anymore ( Windows 95 98) either. Nor can I ever say SE ( Second edition , since there was a Windows 98 SE ). Quit your whining some people are confused by the use of the letter XP at first , but then then they are informed of our usage of the letters XP.
Im sorry back to the reason I was responding. Dom Pedro where are these horses for the Sioux horsemen going to come from? if you go by Marlas World map theres no horses in the americas, and the AI cant seem to trade with Europe for a few thousand years into the game.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Random Passerby
|
|
I'm surprised that with all the uproar over which civs made it into the original game, there haven't been more oddball candidates thrown in. Interesting candidates to fill gaps in the map placement (the expansion WILL have set starting locations, right? Right?) might be the Inuit, an Australian aborigine civ, or possibly one of the West African empires such as Ghana or Mali. The Sioux might also fit into this category as well.
Of course, if any civs like these were put in, there would be another wave of ranting about the civ selection, which would be almost as fun as the fact itself of having civs to fill these holes on the world map.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|