 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:19
|
|
Interesting news this morning. Christian Cullen has been dropped from the AB squad against the Irish.
Oh, and Queensland have sacked coach Mark McBain. Which only confirms the rumors that have been floating around for the last two seasons. It was said that he didn't have the confidence of senior players. It was said he was tactically inept. Still, he took them to the finals last season and as near as damn this season. Who'd be a coach?
Last edited by finbar on 11-06-2002 at 04:38
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: I can't help but feel you miss something not having a national tournament though. |
Funny. I thought the British used to lecture the French that their championship was a bad thing and the reason why they played foul back when they decided to ban France from the 5 nations (OK it was quite a few decades ago). Still, you have a point. National championship is something great.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tamerlin
|
 |
Toulouse (South-western France)
Apr 2002 time: 06:19
|
|
Hi everybody,
I never thought I would find a Rugby thread on Apolyton. First of all, I must admit I have not understood everything (we are in the same boat LDiCesare) and that I don't know some of the players you are talking about (I know the greater part of them though). 
About Australia vs. France, it's rather difficult to estimate the capacity of our players to win the tests. The french championship is only finished since a week, the season has been long and tough and the french players are known to be unpredictable. But we have some reasons (the six nations tournament and the victories against southern hemisphere teams) to believe they can learn to be more regular under the guidance of Bernard Laporte and his staff. At least we hope they will. 
About Joe Roff : the fact he is one of the best player in the world is not to be discussed. But, I've not seen him at his best in France. I've followed the whole french championship (as usual) and went to the stadium everytime a match was played in Toulouse (LdiCesare : j'étais ŕ Montpellier, sniff ! ). Joe Roff has played like a good (and certainly not best) level french championship player, no more, no less.
I would like to insist on the fact the northern hemisphere Rugby, and especially the french one, is very different from the southern hemisphere play. When I look at the Tri-Nations or the Super 12, I sometimes wonder if we are playing the same game (undisputed scrums for example) and if we are following the same rules (some faults we consider very bad are almost ignored by the referee). The european Rugby is more based on the fundamentals (pushed scrums, mauls, attack towards the wings) while yours is (in my opinion) more physical, "mechanical" (please forgive my lack of vocabulary) and certainly more spectacular.
Perhaps Joe Roff has never really managed to get used to these differences, perhaps Biarritz' coaches have tried to use Joe Roff in a wrong way or the game played by his team didn't fit well with his qualities, perhaps was he on holidays... ?
I don't consider we are playing a superior Rugby though I think we, in Europe, are closer to the spirit of the game as it was created. And, honestly, I don't like most of the new rules and the changes they have provoked in this game. The simple fact some have seriously imagined the scrums should not be pushed anymore is horryfying.
It would be great if we could play at the same game with the same rules though I don't think it will be enough for a northern nation to win the RWC, but our time will come (when the stars are right...).
There is only one thing I'am sure of, the "Brennus Shield" is the most beautiful trophee in the world. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin
Hi everybody, |
Hi! Great to see more rugby fans posting here! Welcome!
quote:
they can learn to be more regular under the guidance of Bernard Laporte and his staff. At least we hope they will.  |
I hope so too, I would like to see France beat Australia, but Im from New Zealand, so thats to be expected...
quote:
I would like to insist on the fact the northern hemisphere Rugby, and especially the french one, is very different from the southern hemisphere play. When I look at the Tri-Nations or the Super 12, I sometimes wonder if we are playing the same game (undisputed scrums for example) |
Undisputed scrums?? Never seen that myself.
quote:
and if we are following the same rules (some faults we consider very bad are almost ignored by the referee). |
Can you give me an example?
quote:
The european Rugby is more based on the fundamentals (pushed scrums, mauls, attack towards the wings) while yours is (in my opinion) more physical, "mechanical" (please forgive my lack of vocabulary) |
Thats funny, I would have said the exact same thing about NH rugby...
quote: and certainly more spectacular. |
oh, ok.
quote:
I don't consider we are playing a superior Rugby though I think we, in Europe, are closer to the spirit of the game as it was created. |
I like to think of SH rugby as being more....progressive
quote:
And, honestly, I don't like most of the new rules and the changes they have provoked in this game. The simple fact some have seriously imagined the scrums should not be pushed anymore is horryfying. |
I honestly dont know what makes you think scrums are becoming uncontested in the SH, has someone suggested this should be the case? Maybe youve been watching rugby league
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tamerlin
|
 |
Toulouse (South-western France)
Apr 2002 time: 06:19
|
|
Hi,
In the SH the number 9 is introducing the ball into the scrum, the ball is generally quickly played out. When I write the scrum are undisputed, I mean that many SH teams are not trying to push powerfully in order to win the ball (at least this is what I perceive). Of course, and thankfully, this is not the case for the mauls.
In France, the scrums are used by powerful packs to earn an advantage, recover some balls and wear out the other players. I don't think this is anymore the case in the SH. The "Sporting Union Agenais", finalist of the French championship, have won their semi-final against the "Stade Toulousain" (Bouhouhouhou ! ) thanks, among other reasons, to their first three lines which have disrupted the "Stade Toulousain" game by committing themselves to a hard fight each scrum. The key of the final has been in the hand of the first and third lines. It has not been the most beautiful game I have seen, but it has certainly be one of the most interesting rugby fight I have ever seen.
There are no different rules per se in the SH of course but huge differences in interpretation. I find the SH referees are too lenient :
- Rucking : almost always sanctionned in France (except when the referee is looking elsewhere), the only player which can do some rucking is the half-scrum and only in order to recover the ball.
- Violent entry into a scrum : almost never whistled in the SH,
- Entering by the side of the scrum : not often signaled in the SH,
- Diving over the scrum : is there any rule against that in the SH...
I've not seen a SH rugby match since the end of the Super 12 but let me see a game and I will point you many differences in interpretation.
Whatsoever, I've seen wonderful games in the super 12, the Tri-nations or the various tests, but I still consider the SH Rugby is evolving into something close to an other game, perhaps more progressist, but still another game. I prefer the Rugby as we play it in Europe, less spectacular but more like a hard fight. I like games with a strong fight between the first lines sacrifying themselves for the backs and their wonderful runs... as the all blacks (or should I say the all backs ) terrorizing the planet a few years ago. Today, as seen from Europe, the SH play is rather standardized (give me back the "all blacks" I knew... uuuuh, wait until the end of the future RWC, please).
New rules are sometimes a boon (recovering the throw in a lineout when you are kicking the ball out of the field after a penalty) when they are "in the spirit" of the game. This is not always the case.
Whatever my opinion, the SH teams are great teams... and will stay great teams.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin
Hi,
In the SH the number 9 is introducing the ball into the scrum, the ball is generally quickly played out. When I write the scrum are undisputed, I mean that many SH teams are not trying to push powerfully in order to win the ball (at least this is what I perceive). Of course, and thankfully, this is not the case for the mauls. |
I see what you are getting at now. You are referring to the fact that its unusual for the team that isnt feeding the ball into the scrum to win it in the scrum. I am happy with this because a scrum is usually the result of a knock-on or some other handling error. I think the team that made the error should lose the advantage whether they have a good scrum or not.
quote:
In France, the scrums are used by powerful packs to earn an advantage, recover some balls and wear out the other players. I don't think this is anymore the case in the SH. |
I have seen it happen a couple of times, but I admit it isnt the norm.
quote:
There are no different rules per se in the SH of course but huge differences in interpretation. I find the SH referees are too lenient : |
We in the SH feel that NH refs are too strict . We like to see a game that is allowed to flow more than a game with rules that are rigorously enforced.
quote:
- Violent entry into a scrum : almost never whistled in the SH,
- Entering by the side of the scrum : not often signaled in the SH,
- Diving over the scrum : is there any rule against that in the SH... |
Im a bit confused here, are you referring to the ruck?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin
About Joe Roff : the fact he is one of the best player in the world is not to be discussed. But, I've not seen him at his best in France. I've followed the whole french championship (as usual) and went to the stadium everytime a match was played in Toulouse (LdiCesare : j'étais ŕ Montpellier, sniff ! ). Joe Roff has played like a good (and certainly not best) level french championship player, no more, no less. |
Obviously I haven't seen Joe Roff playing in France, but I think his style of play - developed over years with the Brumbies and Wallabies - probably didn't immediately fit the European style. Of course he could change his style - adapt - but that takes a little while. There is another factor, too. Joe, while a very fine player, is very, very arrogant. Maybe that had something to do with it, too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:19
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin
Hi,
In the SH the number 9 is introducing the ball into the scrum, the ball is generally quickly played out. When I write the scrum are undisputed, I mean that many SH teams are not trying to push powerfully in order to win the ball (at least this is what I perceive). Of course, and thankfully, this is not the case for the mauls. |
Yes, there is an identifiable difference between NH and SH scrums. In the SH, when they have the feed, the scrum is used as more of a springboard for moving the ball elsewhere. It's a different style brought about as much as anything, I think, by the sheer lack of size of our props. It's a very long time since there was a SH front row of mammoth proportions. So, rather than fight a battle you're likely to lose, different methods were used. These days, we look for props who are mobile and - fingers crossed - with ball skills.
quote: There are no different rules per se in the SH of course but huge differences in interpretation. I find the SH referees are too lenient :
- Rucking : almost always sanctionned in France (except when the referee is looking elsewhere), the only player which can do some rucking is the half-scrum and only in order to recover the ball.
- Violent entry into a scrum : almost never whistled in the SH,
- Entering by the side of the scrum : not often signaled in the SH,
- Diving over the scrum : is there any rule against that in the SH... |
I know you've said you didn't mean the scrum. But I have to disagree with your points.
- Rucking is allowed in the SH. Anyone can ruck. You see it a lot. What's not allowed is "stomping". There's obviously a difference. As Brumbie and Wallaby Owen Finnegan discovered when he was suspended for "stomping" on an opponent's head when the ball was nowhere near.
- Violent entry is also penalised. It happened a number of times this season.
- Entering from the side is also penalised. It happened in every game this season. In fact, it was probably the most common penalty.
- Diving over is also penalised. Again, it happened a lot.
Obviously, a referee will sometimes miss things, but, for the most part, these things are policed. Our British friend, Havk, says that SH players are often off-side at the breakdown, but I don't think they are as often as he likes to think. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:19
|
|
quote: Tigers have drawn Beziers in next years competition, how do they rank alongside Stade Toulousain? |
To be blunt, they are weaker (and I am not toulousain, so I believe I'm fair).
They have a few strong players but they do not have the same collective the Stade (or Agen or Biarritz) has. Their season was a relative disappointment as they didn't make it to half finals. I am not sure which players stay there and which will leave next season though.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:19. Apolyton Time is 00:19. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|