 |
|  |
 |
|
Faeelin
|
|
Tau Ceti
Oct 2001 time: 05:20
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Urban Ranger
That's just silly move attempting to pull wool over everybody's eyes. The US knows that they can't get rid of Arafat, so Dubya is basing his support of a Palestinian State on his removal. He's thinking that, if the PA rejects his demand, he'd just shrug his shoulders and say, "Hey I tried."
It's clear as day how one-sided this proposal is, with absolutely no demand for Israel, nothing like removing all settlements on the West Bank, nothing like withdrawing from occupied territories. |
You've just been added to my list of people with no common sense.
Perhaps he's saying that they don't have a chance in hell of getting their own state until they stop with terrorism. What, exactly, makes that an unacceptable demand?
Bush also called for, specifically, an end to Israeli settlements.
Now maybe you can get outraged over one of hte more serious cases of injustice and oppression.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
I think I have the problem solved: Mahatma Gandhi should take control of the PA and Neville Chamberlain should take the helm for Israel.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Saint Marcus
|
 |
Scio Me Nihil Scire
Jan 1970 time: 06:20
|
|
quote: Are you and Marcus saying that the Palistinian people do not want peace with Isreal? |
I never said that.
I was merely pointing out a potential problem and inconcistency in Bush' plans.
Bush wants pacificts to lead the PA. Bush also wants to make the PA more democratic. Those two goals don't mix. It is in fact dangerous to make the PA democratic. Should there be democratic elections in the PA, there are only two possible outcomes. A re-election of Arafat, which neither Bush nor Sharon wants, or the election of a Hamas (or pro-Hamas) hardliner, which is 10 times worse than Arafat. And yeah, there are people within the PA who are more moderate than Arafat. But there are few, and none could wish to win an election.
And should Arafat get re-elected, what would Bush then do? He can't go on saying that he wants to get rid of Arafat, since Arafat will be democratically elected in the way Bush wants a Palestinian leader to be elected. His whole play just backfired.
And it would be 10 times worse if a hardliner is elected. Bush got what he wanted. Rid of Arafat, and democratic elections for the PA. Yet the situation resulting from that is far worse than the situation is now.
In short: bad idea.
I wish I could just say that this is yet another Shrubya screwup, but sadly the EU is also (mostly) supporting this idea. I personally prefer to have the PA as it is, until a state has been given to them. Elections will only make matters far far worse, either by making Arafat's leadership legal and official, or by making way for extremists to run the PA.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|