 |
|
TCO
|
 |
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:20
|
|
Galis and Ramo, you miss the key issue with the SAT. It is not a pat on the head for smart little AP kids (like you). The purpose is to serve as a predictive estimator for college performance. And more specifically to do what Apocolypse said. (An independent additional differentiator after grades.) Look into the field. Study the regressions and statistical surveys. Quite a bit is available on the College Board website. You might learn something...too! I have not been impressed by either of you in your understanding of multi-factor regressions, Design of Experiments (DOE), surveying methodologies, etc.
Last edited by TCO on 29-06-2002 at 02:41
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TCO
|
 |
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:20
|
|
Do you have some proof of your statement? How flawed is it in that range? (I've done a fair amount of interviewing of 1350 and 1500 type applicants. I noticed a real difference between the 1350 group and the 1500 group.) I would agree that from about 1500 to 1600 it has some issues. At the very high ranges of course there are issues since performance is capped at 1600 of course. But as I said before, the test is designed for the general population not gving little Victor Galis a pat on the head or telling him whether he is MIT material or is more of a YellowJacket at heart.
I doubt the variability of test scores for people at 1350 is much different than that of people at 1000, from test to test. (Feel free to prove me wrong--I'm very eager for you both to start thinking more scientifically in this area.)
Last edited by TCO on 29-06-2002 at 02:54
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:20
|
|
quote: It is not a pat on the head for smart little AP kids (like you). |
I agree. In fact, that's exactly what I wrote. 
quote: The purpose is to serve as a predictive estimator for college performance. |
I see that as one of the purposes. The other purpose, IMO, is to fix our school system.
It may not be the "official" purpose, but it's a damn good way to get the job done.
quote: The SAT isn't meant to set the guidleines for school's curriculum, Ramo. |
It does, though.
However, if we fix the test, it would serve as a pressure for reform of our school system.
quote: And because college administrators do like to see students take the hardest classes available, people taking AP classes is becoming more common and so people take harder classes that way. |
BTW, the high school I went to freshman year didn't have AP tests (at least I don't recall it having any).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:20
|
|
The SAT is archaic.
Provinces here do standardized finals for 12th grade subjects. Univerisities then look at those diploma exam marks (what they're called) specifically at each subject at hand (bio, chem, physics, math, english, social studies, etc).
Our English and Social Studies exams both required essays on top of multiple choice exams. But we're allowed to type them on the computers. They go around and install special versions of Office with the spellchecker/grammarchecker disabled, among other things, and let us type it up and submit it electronically and on paper. That's what I did. 
The exams are all grouped together and sent to one central location where teachers all meet to mark them. Each student is assigned a special number for the tests that the teachers don't know, so it's anonymous. And 3 teachers mark the test, the average is taken. If you're not happy with the mark you and get it remarked for a fee.
Beats the hell out of the SAT. 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20. Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|