 |
Who should be our next President?
This poll is closed. |
| Trip (UFC) |
   |
73 |
48.99% |
| Ninot (DIA) |
   |
76 |
51.01% |
| Total: |
149 voters |
100% |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Luk
|
|
Wroclaw, Lower Silesia, Poland
Mar 1999
time: 06:20
|
|
I do not recognize Ninot as president. He won like Bush in elections 2000. I did not play in this game much, I only voted, but now Im out definitly.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Papa Chubby
|
|
Iceland
Jun 2002
time: 05:20
|
|
I don´t see the correlation between the 2nd presidential election of the Civ3 Democracy game and the presidential election in the US in 2000. There was a problem certainly, but that is apart of the appeal of the game. The building up of your own society, with its own rules, certainly based upon existing models, but nonetheless our own. Perhaps I will just settle for joining Guardian in waving you goodbye.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
wervdon
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by skywalker
What if, when MarkG subtracts the nonmember ballots, we find that Trip won? |
I don't think it'd matter after trip conceded.
All the constitution currently says about elections is under the polling stuff, and this is how it says the winner of a poll (option or candidate) are selected:
quote:
Poll Format:
Each official poll MUST include either a ‘yes/no’ format, or a ‘group’ format, where similar options are grouped together, where the winning option within the group with the most votes is the official winner. The only time these formats do not have to be followed is in true multiple-choice polls, i.e. ‘Which Civilization should we be: Egyptians, Persians. Etc.’ In these cases, a simple ‘yes/no’ or ‘grouping’ poll does not suffice.
|
The election poll would be a group format poll, it just says the option with the most votes win. But since Trip has more or less said he's no longer an option, that would mean that Ninot automatically has the most votes of the valid options.
Of course, I guess someone could try to challenge it as being an invalid poll under the fairness and neutrality clause...I don't see why anyone would since Ninot was the only other option anyways and either is going to have the most votes or very nearly have the most votes.
I don't personally like how that works for elections, but its our "law" currently as best as I can understand it, but it hopefully won't be our law come the next election 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Papa Chubby
|
|
Iceland
Jun 2002
time: 05:20
|
|
Why should we detract the votes of the non-members. We have never stated that you would have to be a member to be able to vote. If this is something we want, then we need to put this into the election amendment III proposed by Trip. Also believe that winning by majority should be more clearly defined, as there were alot of people supporing co-presidency based upon one vote deciding being somehow unfair.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:20.
Apolyton Time is 00:20. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
17-07-2002 08:45
!!
|