 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:21
|
|
nationalist, you're a moron. Kramerman said, "Death is a cake walk compared to what I would do if put in a room with a sicko like that..." I understand full well that the father of a child who was raped and murdered would feel that way. Kramerman, however, has no right to feel that way, let alone act upon it. As it turns out, he was just posturing to look like a man as opposed to saying something that he truely feels.
As for the slippery slope, we've seen over and over again, once you open up the door, once you say, that a group is unworthy of protection, it isn't at all hard to expand that group. It happens almost every single time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
nationalist
|
 |
None of your Goddamned business
Nov 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
That doesn't seem to be his point at all. Let me quote him.
"You are the kind of peole this world needs to be protected from"
Doesn't seem like a rational argument here.
"Why, was your little girl raped and murdered? How I might feel about a person who injured me directly, and about a person who has not affected my in any way are two different things.
The sad fact is, you are almost as disgusting a person, because you enjoy the thought of committing torture. You rationalize it away by claiming that these are unworthy people, but the fact is, if you can torture them, you can torture anyone. You're ****ing sick. The world needs to be protected from sick ****s like you."
This statement has two parts. 1st: Why should anyone care that strongly about something that doesn't directly affect him. It didn't happen to me, so I don't think that the man should be tortured.
2nd: Since it doesn't want me to torture him, then it shouldn't make you want to torture him either. Since it does, then you must have something wrong with you. He hasn't done anything worth torture in my eyes, so he isn't deserving of torture. If you could torture him, then you could torture anyone. Therefore, you are sick.
This post also doesn't reflect your claim that he means:"why should the state exact revenge on behalf of the bereaved, when their function should be reform and the safety of the public."
However, your posts all are centered around this hypothesis. I think that you are sympathetic towards Che and his ideas, and therefore want to imbue his posts with your ideas. You disagree with me, so you want to make me out to be an aggressive idiot. I can have a discussion with you, but I am going to treat your arguments as yours and not as Che's.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
nationalist, you're a moron. Kramerman said, "Death is a cake walk compared to what I would do if put in a room with a sicko like that..." I understand full well that the father of a child who was raped and murdered would feel that way. Kramerman, however, has no right to feel that way, let alone act upon it. As it turns out, he was just posturing to look like a man as opposed to saying something that he truely feels.
As for the slippery slope, we've seen over and over again, once you open up the door, once you say, that a group is unworthy of protection, it isn't at all hard to expand that group. It happens almost every single time. |
WHY DO I HAVE NO RIGHT TO FEEL THAT WAY!? Should not everbody be outraged by such a deed? It sickens me that you are jumping on me for wanting to rough a friggin child killer. *sigh* I am sorry, but that freaking makes me sick to my stomach. I have every right, as does every potential father and citizen, to want to punish those who would wish to take my family away in such a horrible manner.
And it is quite hard to expand that group, in the USA anyway. You know how many rights protection people are out there who jump on the governments back foranything that may threaten our rights. Thats not including the press, who love to fry those politicians who try to do something corrupt. But it doesnt matter, like I said, cause I was never seriously advocating torture anyway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
nationalist
|
 |
None of your Goddamned business
Nov 2001 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
As for the slippery slope, we've seen over and over again, once you open up the door, once you say, that a group is unworthy of protection, it isn't at all hard to expand that group. It happens almost every single time. |
Murderous criminals are unworthy of protection. They have made themselves that way solely by their actions. They are not determined by class, race, language, etc. They are grouped by their actions and by their actions alone. This is not the beginning of a slippery slope. This is upholding the rule of law. I support the execution of murderous criminals. I do not support the execution of Jews, Blacks, Whites, etc. There is a fundamental difference between the former and the latter. Saying that the execution of one will lead to the execution of the other is ludicrous.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: Says a wussy teen who doesn't know jack squat. You wouldn't last a week in prison. You'd be raped, constantly. The guards wouldn't protect you. You'd probably kill yourself to escape fairly quickly |
erm...right. In prison they get a roof over their head, a bed to sleep on, clean laundry, 3 meals a day. They have an excersie yard, a library, television, family visits, congical visits, and even friggin internet access. That is damncushy by prison standards. Go to China if you dont know what I mean. Being a teen as i am, I would go to juevenile detention, not a federal or state prison . Furthermore, I would never kill myself. I would simpliy ask my lawyer to bring rape charges against those who rape me. If the prison wouldnt transfer me for endangerment of my life thereafter, then I could sue . No why I can do all that? Cause our prison system is so damn cushy!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oerdin
|
 |
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001 time: 21:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by paiktis22
oerdin, the threat of torture has been canceled from the consciousness of humanity as a "leagl" or "justified" retribution. (even retribution per se has been disqualified since it is revenge). I think the DP will follow that road. the US is sharing the DP with countries like Iraq and Saudi Arabia after all. |
Edit: After rereading paiktis's quote I realize I missunderstood what she said. Torture has been outlawed in most cases you're right. /edit
Torture? I didn't mention a word about torture nor do I advicate torture as part of a sound legal system. As for DP being canceled from the consciousness of humanity... well, here you are confusing modern liberal European views as being the consciousness of humanity. The US is not connected to the EU and has every right to carry on it's own discusion and to reach its own conclusion about whither capital punishment is effective and justified.
The results of this discusion is that capital punishment can only be administered under very strictly defined guidelines and the means of exicution must be such that it minimizes pain and suffering for the condemned in every way possible. The defendent also gets numerous appeals and judicial reviews including automatic hearings by the United States Supreme Court. There is also a lengthy waiting period which often lasts up to two decades just encase new evidience should happen to come to light.
Can the system be made better? Yes, and it is constinently under review, however, this doesn't change the fact that the punishment must fit the crime and the death penalty is a legal and effective tool of both punishment and deterence.
That said I think Paiktis is right that a life sentence should mean the guilty spend the rest of their life in prision and not be parolled in 10 or 20 years. Use of this law would help to minimize the number of executions.
Last edited by Oerdin on 07-08-2002 at 05:37
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kramerman
|
 |
UT, Austin - The live music capital of the world
Jun 2002 time: 23:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nationalist
That doesn't seem to be his point at all. Let me quote him.
"You are the kind of peole this world needs to be protected from"
Doesn't seem like a rational argument here.
"Why, was your little girl raped and murdered? How I might feel about a person who injured me directly, and about a person who has not affected my in any way are two different things.
The sad fact is, you are almost as disgusting a person, because you enjoy the thought of committing torture. You rationalize it away by claiming that these are unworthy people, but the fact is, if you can torture them, you can torture anyone. You're ****ing sick. The world needs to be protected from sick ****s like you."
This statement has two parts. 1st: Why should anyone care that strongly about something that doesn't directly affect him. It didn't happen to me, so I don't think that the man should be tortured.
2nd: Since it doesn't want me to torture him, then it shouldn't make you want to torture him either. Since it does, then you must have something wrong with you. He hasn't done anything worth torture in my eyes, so he isn't deserving of torture. If you could torture him, then you could torture anyone. Therefore, you are sick.
This post also doesn't reflect your claim that he means:"why should the state exact revenge on behalf of the bereaved, when their function should be reform and the safety of the public."
However, your posts all are centered around this hypothesis. I think that you are sympathetic towards Che and his ideas, and therefore want to imbue his posts with your ideas. You disagree with me, so you want to make me out to be an aggressive idiot. I can have a discussion with you, but I am going to treat your arguments as yours and not as Che's. |
This is also a rational arguement. It can be argued to be true or false, but none the less, it is rational.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oerdin
|
 |
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001 time: 21:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by loinburger
If the numbers weren't so severe, i.e. if 2000 innocent lives were lost but 10,000 innocent lives were saved as a result, then would you still say that the system was 8,000 innocent lives ahead? What if the numbers were 9,999 innocents put to death for 10,000 innocents saved: are you still one innocent ahead? |
Seeings how less then 100 people are executed per year in the US (I believe but I'm guessing there) I would say it is completely non-sensical to discuss "what ifs" that involve 9,999 or even 8,000. The fact remains the number executed is exceedingly modest where as the number detered is, presumably, quite large.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|