 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
Our top players are exceeding 40 first class games every season. It’s way too much rugby and it takes massive toll on the bodies. |
40 first-class games in a season is ridiculous. BTW, what are you calling a first-class game? Do you include the Zurich Cup? (Or whatever the domestic comp is called?)
Edit. I picked up this morning's paper after I'd posted this. How appropriate that I should find a rugby article in which it's mentioned that there's an agreement between the ARU and the Rugby Players' Association that no player will play more than 30 matches a season. That includes club comp matches. It's still a lot of matches but a lot more sensible than 40. Is there any such agreement in place in England? If not, there should be.
quote: Well for a start he should still be playing when Larkham is retired so that certainly surpasses him right? |
*Havak dons his semanticist's hat* 
quote: He is one of a new mould of fly half for us – not the old type who kicked the pill to the corners all the time. |
Which is why your rugby has improved. There are now more options. 
Anyway, I still think we're comparing two quite different players and, it seems to me, it's pointless. They will both go down as great players. Larkham's basically a bit of a freak with a package of skills all his own. The only player I've seen who remotely resembles him is Mark Ella.
quote: Is Jones still alive and does he still believe he was right despite evidence to the contrary? If so he and Jack Rowell should get on like a house on fire. |
Sad to say, Alan Jones still lives and breathes. He's now a top-rating, rabidly right-wing radio announcer. Yes, he still believes he was right, because he points to his coaching record. One of the man's biggest failings - amongst the myriad - is that he's never wrong. Stuff ups and problems are always someone else's fault. (Including, presumably, the minor problem of the charge of soliciting in a gent's public toilet in London, a charge that was, later, mysteriously, dropped)
quote: Okay okay – just watch the guy in the autumn and give me your assessment. I’ll accept you verdict after you have done so. Even is you don’t rate him I’ll accept…that there’s no hope for you. 
I still don’t know why you have such trouble with this – the guy is one of the very best ever pure and simple, and the latest in a long long line of super English locks. They have always been our strength, and even when the team is fairly poor we have generally had solid locks.  |
Obviously he's a great player. His only problem as far as I'm concerned is - as you should, by now, be well aware - that he's your favourite player. 
OTOH, and this will be my single, sole response to your bait - your claim that he's superior to J.E. is woolly in the extreme. When your lad can kick goals; when he has skippered his team to a WRC win; when he has been the only class player in an average side and has constantly risen to the occasion; and, most important of all, when he doesn't have a major question mark alongside his temperament, then I'll entertain a discussion on the matter. 
quote: I’m very pleased to hear this actually. He was out of order. Can we expect Gregan to be similarly cited for his overt criticism of the citing officials and committee. Exactly the same deal to my mind – he should have kept his mouth firmly closed? |
Vastly different cases, I'd've thought. Mehrtens, effectively, publicly villified the ref. Gregan didn't villify anyone. He called for uniformity in judicial matters. No different to a skipper, for example, calling for an examination of a particular rule, which happens all the time. If George had said something to the effect that the tribunal "should have been ashamed of its performance" (basically Mehrtens' words about the ref), it would have been different.
Thanks! I was pretty chuffed with it too. 
quote: I mentioned the France you played in the final bore no resemblance to the one that beat the All Blacks. I said I hope that if you win next year you will have to face England or the All Blacks – what could be the number one and two ranked teams at that time – to gain a sense of achievement. |
My point was - what happens if we beat both England and the All Blacks (which might not be possible, I haven't looked at the draw) and neither England nor the All Blacks happen to be at their best on the day? What I'm saying is, IMHO, the whole "hollow victory" thing is a bit sus. You can only beat whomever lines up against you in whatever shape they're in.
What happens if Gregan and Larkham break their legs in the first round? Or Wilkinson and Jonno? Or Mehrtens and Jack? Is whomever beats the afflicted side gaining a hollow victory?
And, as I've said before - I think it was in regard to the pointlessness of rankings - whomever wins the WRC is the World Champion team on that particular day. The next day is the next day. Sorry to blather on about it, but I think way too much importance is placed on such intangible things. Which isn't to say, obviously, that a WRC isn't bliss-out time for me. 
quote: Probably true, however “quick, very strong, a line-breaker, and a great tackler” describes Healey perfectly. The fact he generally breaks the line by avoiding the tackle rather than breaking it might be the difference? So really I need to see them on the same field to judge? |
Mortlock breaks the line when he needs to - which is to say, when he's not powering through a hole. (Which is your cue to reply that A. Healey creates gaps, and I reply that S. Mortlock invented rugby, and you reply that A. Healy invented quantum physics ... ad infinitum ... )
quote: Okay, right, out goes Larkham and in comes Wilko – that sorts the kicking properly (I believe he is better than Merhtens in terms of success ratio)? |
Why am I not surprised? Why are you not surprised that I would suggest S. Mortlock for A. Healey solved your goal kicking problem in the first place and, most importantly, without breaking up the precious half-back/5-8 combination? 
quote: I don't know the Bok fullback - thats isn't the lad who played there against Australia is it? |
No, Russell came on as a winger in their first match against us, replaced Pretorius at 5/8 in the starting line-up for the second match. Runs like a gazelle when he gets the ball in hand. Lacks the experience to know actually what he's going to do next.
Last edited by finbar on 24-08-2002 at 12:24
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
NeoStar
|
 |
Sydney
Jul 2002 time: 15:21
|
|
As I said after the Springbok / Wallaby game - Gregan had been passing the ball at every touch. I've read in the paper today Jones is directing him to be more greedy with the ball and run with it like he used to so well.
When he starts doing that again he'll remind us why he is the best halfback in the game at present. 
BTW - Interesting teams fellas, a bit skinny of Aussie representation though. if you want a laugh check out this Planet-Rugby 2002 Tri Nations XV (utterly AB dominated and only 2 Wallabies):
15 Werner Greeff, 14 Ben Tune, 13 Marius Joubert, 12 Aaron Mauger, 11 Doug Howlett, 10 Andrew Mehrtens, 9 Justin Marshall (captain), 8 Scott Robertson, 7 Richard McCaw, 6 Joe van Niekerk, 5 Chris Jack, 4 Jannes Labuschagne, 3 Greg Somerville, 2 Jeremy Paul, 1 Dave Hewett.

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by NeoStar
As I said after the Springbok / Wallaby game - Gregan had been passing the ball at every touch. I've read in the paper today Jones is directing him to be more greedy with the ball and run with it like he used to so well. |
And as I said once before, there was a time when George was accused of running with it (and kicking it) too much. 
quote: When he starts doing that again he'll remind us why he is the best halfback in the game at present. |
He remains the best #9, to my mind. His only competition (that I've seen this season) can't get a start in the AB team.
quote: 15 Werner Greeff, 14 Ben Tune, 13 Marius Joubert, 12 Aaron Mauger, 11 Doug Howlett, 10 Andrew Mehrtens, 9 Justin Marshall (captain), 8 Scott Robertson, 7 Richard McCaw, 6 Joe van Niekerk, 5 Chris Jack, 4 Jannes Labuschagne, 3 Greg Somerville, 2 Jeremy Paul, 1 Dave Hewett. |
Ridiculous. For starters, the Wallaby pack did more than enough against both the ABs and the Boks to warrant more representation. For what it's worth, I'd go this way, based on performance:
15 Greeff (or Latham, a split decision); 14 Tune; 13 Mortlock; 12 Mauger; 11 Howlett; 10 Larkham; 9 Gregan; 8 Robertson (or Kefu, a split decision); 7 McCaw; 6 Smith; 5 Jack; 4 Sharpe; 3 Somerville; 2 Paul; 1 Young.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by NeoStar
Is it not human nature to want what we're not getting? |
Careful, NeoStar, you could be a candidate for a yellow card for profundity. I realise you're still relatively new in this thread, so you should be aware that we deal only in the trite, shallow and meaningless. 
quote: That looks more sound but how do you put Larkham past Mehrtens based on current form? Our little maestro hasn't been in his best form lately - not since his injury at the Super12 final I'd argue. |
1. Larkham's form isn't that bad. He was smashed in the opening minutes of the last match, which quietened him. Prior to that, he had a couple of fine matches, including the second ABs game where he outplayed Mehrtens.
2. Mehtrens, because his defence is hugely suspect, spends time hidden at full back. Larkham - at great physical cost to himself - is a fierce defender, staying in the line, backing up, supporting the attack. Mehrtens is a good strategist and a brilliant tactical kicker, but I think Larkham will always have a much more rounded game than him.
3. You need a very damn good reason to split up a proven halves combination. I didn't find anything approaching even a half-baked reason. On top of which, as I said, the ABs won't give their best scrum-half a start.
quote: BTW - Will the Argentina & Europe tour be exclusively on Foxtel again? If so I'll have to get it a month earlier than planned, I can't miss another one |
I'm not sure who will cover the NH tour. I'll look into it for you.
Edit. This season anyway, Foxtel and 7 shared the rights to show Wallaby and S12 matches played in Australia but only 7 had the rights to matches played outside the country. If that situation continues with the NH tour, Foxtel probably won't be showing the matches, meaning we will be stuck with the vagaries and indulgences of 7. I sincerely hope that won't be the case.
Last edited by finbar on 25-08-2002 at 09:19
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by finbar
I'll check out the total results - Tri-Nations and Bledisloe. It will be interesting to see. The Wallabies have won 7 Bledisloes since 1992 (that's 7 out of 11) and 2 Tri-Nations since its inception. I think at least one of our Bledisloes was a one-off Test, so the AB Tri-Nations wins might squeak you over the line. |
I was thinking more along the lines of most victories - not necessarily against each other.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|