 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:21
|
|
Wow! Anyone who saw the game can post some more details of what happened?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
After AndyDog's and Mickeyk's late bets, the Bank A/c read:
academia 92
Andydog 153-40 = 113
Caligastia 37-10 = 27
finbar 130-30 = 100
Havak 46-20 = 26
LDiCesares 104-15 = 89
Mickeyj 121-50 = 71
NeoStar 134-20 = 114
ravagon 114-20 = 94
Tamerlin 69-20 = 49
The updated pool stood at 225 Civ Gold.
The bets were placed as follows:
Boks
Andydog 40
finbar 30
Havak 20
LDiCesares 15
Mickeyj 50
Wallabies
Caligastia 10
NeoStar 20
ravagon 20
Tamerlin 20
And, with the Boks winning, the successful punters have collected as follows (rounded up or down if need be, and including your original stake):
Andydog 58
finbar 43.5
Havak 29
LDiCesares 22
Mickeyj 72.5
Thus our Bank A/c at the end of the Tri-Nations series (and, effectively, the SH international season) stands as follows:
academia 92
Andydog 171
Caligastia 27
finbar 143.5
Havak 55
LDiCesares 111
Mickeyj 143.5
NeoStar 114
ravagon 94
Tamerlin 49
Now, the interesting question is, what do we do with our fortunes? Those of us who have accumulated them! Do we invest them in some sort of gilt-edged security - I hear there's a t'riffic US telco called WorldCom that's booming, apparently - until the NH international season starts? Or do those of us who feel the urge punt on the NH club season?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
And even my mate George Smith played better in the loose than I think I have ever seen him. |
He's had a couple of very good Tri-Nations matches. Best on field in the Brisbane game. He's coming along very nicely, IMHO, learning all the time.
quote: Roll on November I say! |
It's going to be a fascinating series of encounters.
It's hard to believe this is the same Boks team that struggled against the Pumas. Sure, they're now more experienced, but it's like they have an on-off switch. Their first 15 minutes last night resembled their first match against us - silly penalties, no cohesion. Then - pow! Then, in the last 20 minutes, the switch was turned off again.
It's to their credit that they pulled it off last night without Pretorius. While Russell is a very promising, very dangerous player, it was fairly evident that - via inexperience and enthusiasm - only he knew what was going on when he had ball in hand. His backs ran with him in hope.
Still, they're a very young, very inexperienced team, who will only - with the right guidance - get better and better. And thank God, because world rugby needs a strong Boks outfit. Without the mindless aggro and biffo, I have to say. Because, apart from anything else, they've proved they don't need it. They're a much, much better team without it.
As for the Wallabies - they worry me. Progress has been made through this season, but problems are continually exposed. Our big strong backs, basis of our attacking game, were caught out again last night by the Bok mosquito fleet who turned the defenders inside out. Sure, those wee Boks are going to worry a lot of defences, but our backs were exposed too often throughout the season. I fear we have too many eggs in the big, strong backs basket, and it's about time Matt Rogers started a game instead of coming on during the game when the side is looking for inspiration.
At least the Wallaby discipline was better last night, even taking the Nathan Sharpe punch into account. He was definitely of the view - as were others around him - that he'd been eye-gouged.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:21
|
|
I finally saw a few images of the match and a few comments. It seems to have been a pretty interesting match, but the French TV talked about bad behaviour from the bok supporters like throwing cans on the wallaby players. Was it so? Are South Africans becoming that silly? Or is it just Salviac (the journalist) who is making a lot of noise for the pleasure of hearing his own voice?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by NeoStar
Larkham's kicking game needs desperate help, he doesn't hit the line as hard as he used to and I can detect a lack of confidence in him (note the way he kept kicking away possession in the 1st half). |
Larkham's kicking his fine. His problem on Saturday night was that he was smashed in a late tackle - yet again - in the first couple of minutes. He got to his feet in cuckoo land and I think it took him quite a while to recover. It's a tactic that just about every team uses on him these days.
quote: As for Gregan - the ball's a hot potato, he passes it and never attempts to run the ball himself anymore like in the past (and he was good). |
Gregan probably doesn't kick as often as he should sometimes. It's funny - I remember when he was criticised for kicking too much.
quote: Our wingers and centres are plain uninspired at times but I'll admit Tune was under outside pressures. |
If you can't get and control the ball - which was the Wallaby's problem for too much of Saturday night's match - the backs become redundant. When they do get and control the ball - as in the last 20 minutes on Saturday night, as in a lot of the return match against the ABs, as in most of the first match against the Boks - the Wallabies are a powerful, creative attacking team.
quote: While his goal kicking is great his on field kicking game is not up to the standard the Wallabies need - however I wouldn't put the challange past him to get it right (but a specialist would be preferred - imagine Johns at the helm!). |
I suspect he's intelligent and capable enough to muster a kicking game that will suffice. In fact, most of his kicking in his time on the field thus far has been perfectly adequate.
quote: Our forwards are tip top in comparison. The Wallabies are dying with their backs! |
Obviously we're not watching the same team. IMHO, the forwards are steadily improving, but yet to be tested against the quality forward packs in world rugby (having played only one match against the French with anything like a first-choice pack); while there's absolutely nothing wrong with the backs - their problems (that I referred to yesterday) with countering quicker, more agile attackers aside - when they actually get their hands on the ball.
quote: That is too broad and undefined, dammit! |
No it's not. It's the fundamental problem that has haunted the Wallabies for decades. Our relatively small pool of top-class players has always meant that we don't have more than a couple of choices per position. Sometimes we only have once choice. The key to this paragraph being the words "top-class".
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|