 |
|  |
 |
|
Provost Harrison
|
 |
The farce is strong with this one.
Feb 2000 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Vagabond
Personally I believe that excessive education levels in a society can be counter-productive. There are still a lot of jobs that require relatively unskilled labor. If everyone is too educated, who will fill in those jobs? |
Well we are moving to a point where skill is needed and the amount of pure numerical manpower for manual labour is declining, just a thing of technology to an extent. So the obvious need is for a higher level of education in society.
I acknowledge academic learning really isn't for everyone, and thus, the nature of education depends on the individual...some people may be better learning more applied things rather than intellectual stuff. I, for example, am very 'top heavy' in my abilities - gifted at the sciences but utterly hopeless at the arts and sport...we all have to find what we are good at. General education is important up to a point, but I consider a lot of what I was taught, personally, to be a complete and utter waste of time as well. As I say, people specialise, and if they are doing something that they enjoy and are good at, they are less likely to cause trouble.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
drake
|
 |
Maine, US
Oct 2000 time: 00:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sagacious Dolphin
If people are unaware of things such as basic relevant geography, you begin to question their knowledge in other areas.
In a job environment where you a just a monkey doing a repetitively simple job, no problem. If you are in a job environment that requires a bit of thought and applied knowledge you may worry they have gaps in necessary knowledge.
|
Well what is relevant? Because I know where Idaho is I'm suddenly a better worker? No, I really don't buy that one bit. Someone can be completely ignorant to things around them and be so involved in themselves and their work, that something like geography has no bearing at all on their job performance, or even their ability to function in society.
A programming job for instance requires problem solving skills. Not geography skills. Not once will Bill Gates come to one of his employers and ask them where Timbuktu is. He doesn't care, nor should he.
Specializing in specific areas, as PH mentioned, is IMO more important today than being a man of moderate knowledge in broader areas.
I do believe more education is better than less education, though I do not subscribe to the idea that because someone doesn't know their geography all that well, that they are dumb.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Dauphin
|
 |
Caught in a tuna net
Jan 1970 time: 05:21
|
|
They (the guy and his wife, say mid-forties) thought I was joking at first.
They said they had just come from Buckingham Palace, seen St James' Palace, heard about all the other palaces that London has (Westminster, Lambeth, Kensington etc) and presumed that "Versaille Palace must be around here somewhere!".
"I assure you it isn't".
"Are you sure?"
"Yes".
I felt like saying "Actually, I'm just kidding, its about two miles down that road, hail a cab, it'll be quicker". If I were able to be a fly on the window when the cabbie heard the request, I would have definitely done it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Col Bigspear
|
 |
Manchester, England. Im 1/2 Polish and proud of it!
Jul 2001 time: 05:21
|
|
Hope the pic works
Awww it wont let me post anything over 600x0, so its pretty poor quality
Attachment: america1.jpg
This has been downloaded 46 time(s).
Last edited by Col Bigspear on 17-08-2002 at 03:44
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|