 |
|  |
 |
|
Ethelred
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Frogger
Eth, you haven't answered my concern. Why is it that IBM should be able to tell teh Canadian government which way we should be running our country, just because we aren't as "business-friendly" as Dipshit, South America is? |
Since when does IBMediocre tell the Canadian government what to do? Is it really that wimpy?
Now they do have the right not to do business there. Perhaps that is what you are thinking of. A threat not to do business in a country with money is largely a bluff.
quote:
And I love the way it's "them" borrowing too much money when in a lot of cases it's actually their undemocratic corrupt political asswads. The rule should be as follows: lend money to a dictator at your own peril. |
The catch is that when that happens the lenders won't lend again. Why should they? Also the lenders do take it on the chin upon occasion. Its when the nation (yes the government) wants to borrow more the the IMF has power.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ethelred
Its odd to me just how much of the anti-globalization propaganda comes from Americans. |
That's because you really aren't paying attention. One of the main leaders of the anti-globalization movement (a misnomer, but it will do) is from India, living in India. The truth is, we aren't opposed to globalization, we are opposed to the lack of complete globalization. Why should human rights, civil rights, environmental rights, labor rights, only be allowed in the West? Why should we allow unelected bureaucracies to decide whether or not some country (including the US) should be forced to allow certain products inside their borders, if that country decides that it doesn't want products produced by slaves or which kill dolphins or pollute the environment. Why should the US Federal government be forced to pay some Candaian company almost three quarters of a billion dollars because California has decided that a certain gasoline additive is a carcinogen?
We in the West aren't demanding to put our morals and ethics on other countries. We are supporting the demands of the people of the Third World, the labor unions, the environmentalists, the child laborers, the slaves, etc. The largest contingent of the "anti-globalization" movement lives in the Third World.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sirotnikov
|
 |
<--- Yes, It's a "kitty" in a boot.
Feb 2000 time: 07:22
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Frogger
Because economic globalisation is happening, but political globalisation isn't. The result is that votes count less, dollars count more. **** deal. |
Well this is the first logical explanation of the anti-globalization views I've heard.
And none of the demonstrations, filled with stupid people chanting slogans, and small groups of vandals wrecking the place, have done that so far.
So lefties - congratulations on wasting time, money and resources, on something which could have been replaced with a single post.
quote: It's about signing agreements that limit a country's sovereignty. |
Interesting.
Suddenly communists become interested in a country's sovereignty? The world criminal court, and the war crimes tribunal are all lefty projects and they limit sovereignty. Enviromental agreements, such as the Kyoto agreement also limits a country's sovereignty. The UN is the lefty's haven and it limits a country's sovereignty. The Geneva conventions too.
Universalism is one of the pillars of socialism, ain't it?
What's up with you all?
quote: Yeah, that's why the movement kept growing until 9/11. |
It kept growing because more and more people who want to do "something important for their generation" but don't know what - sought this as that special opportunity to be a lefty activist.
Oh, and don't forget those who were there just for the fun of trashing up a city and baiting the cops.
In any case - this confrontation adds NOTHING to your cause. I've learnt more about your cause from this thread, than from any of the riots or demonstrations.
And you know why?
Because when I meet a person that disrupts my daily life, disrupts traffic, trashes all over the place, and yells extremist commie slogans such as "The Dollar is your new God" and "USA is evil", the last thing I want to do - is listen to what that idiot has to say.
Instead, you should organize lectures, run ads, publish magazines.
But by targetting the extreme left wing crowd, using slogans such as "civil disobedience" and "down with capitalism" , you are only pushing thinking people away from your goal.
Or why not set up a government lobby that would push your terms onto globalization agreements?
May I remind you that people who are standing in the street, obstructing traffic, usually do ZERO to affect decision making.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
ah i love the fine smell of tear gas in the morning.
not actually since i dont go to rallies. (most of the time)
but i had the chance to see how it smelled, once. thank god a burning barel happened to be next to me and it absorded most of it.
you actually dont notice untill its too late. (eyes start dripping with tears)
i hid inside a lotto house and pretend i was feeling a form when the riot police runned passed by. worked too.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:22
|
|
These protests have been successful in raising public awareness of the issuess.
This thread demonstrates this fact.
While some people respond to protests by just saying they're just a bunch of thugs, most people will naturally wonder why the protesters are upset.
The protests have also led the mainstream media to examine the issue of globalization, loss of soverignty, etc.
A couple of years ago, there was a summit in Quebec City. Newspapers, such as the Globe and Mail, published articles about the protesters' concern. Many of the Globe's columnists wrote articles saying the concerns were valid.
None of that would have happened without the protests.
Sirotnikov suggests the lectures should be organized. That is already being done, but the lectures only reach a small audience and rarely get covered by the mainstream media (and that's true for most lectures).
Buying ads costs money and the protesters generally don't have access to that kind of dough.
Magazines are published, but they tend to be bought by the converted.
Protests are the best way to raise these issues.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
it has come to a point where there is a amrch and noone knows or cares what its about.
they only get pissed because of the stopped traffic.
IMHO it has come to a point where marches are good if they are massive, popular, big.
i'm pretty sure that some strategically placed in the city small posters would inform more people than what a tiny march would.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
look at it this way.
after the G7 in italy the people made those bastards go to some mountains in the middle of nowhere in canada to have their stinking meeting.
that's success my friends. and humiliation.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|